The Real Reason for the Global Financial Crisis…the Story No One's Talking About

[Part I of a three-part series looking at how so-called “credit default swap” derivatives could ignite a worldwide capital markets meltdown.]

By Shah Gilani
Contributing Editor

Are you shell-shocked? Are you wondering what's really going on in the market? The truth is probably more frightening than even your worst fears. And yet, you won't hear about it anywhere else because “they” can't tell you. “They” are the U.S. Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury Department, and they can't tell you what's really going on because there's nothing they can do about it, except what they've been trying to do – add liquidity.

At the exchange rate yesterday (Wednesday), 35 trillion British Pounds was equivalent to U.S. $62 trillion (hence, the 35 trillion Pound gorilla). According to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, $62 trillion is the notional value of credit default swaps (CDS) out there, somewhere, in the market.

This isn't the first time Money Morning has warned readers about the dangers of credit default swaps. And it won't be the last.

The Genesis of a Derivative Boom

In the mid-1980s, upon arriving in New York from Chicago with an extensive background trading options and futures (the original derivatives), I was offered a job at what was then Citicorp [today's Citigroup Inc. (C)]. The offer was for an entry-level post in the bank's brand new OTC (over-the-counter, meaning not exchange traded) swaps and derivatives group. When I asked what the economic purpose of swaps was, the answer came back: “To make money for the bank.”

I declined the position.

It used to be that regulators and legislators demanded theoretical, empirical, and quantitative measures of the efficacy of new tradable instruments being proposed by exchanges. What is their purpose? How will they benefit the capital markets and the economy? And, what safeguards will accompany their introduction?

Not any more. In the early 1990s, in order to hedge their loan risks, J. P. Morgan & Co. [now JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)] bankers devised credit default swaps.

A credit default swap is, essentially, an insurance contract between a protection buyer and a protection seller covering a corporation's, or sovereign's (the “referenced entity”), specific bond or loan. A protection buyer pays an upfront amount and yearly premiums to the protection seller to cover any loss on the face amount of the referenced bond or loan.
Typically, the insurance is for five years.

Credit default swaps are bilateral contracts, meaning they are private contracts between two parties. CDSs are subject only to the collateral and margin agreed to by contract. They are traded over-the-counter, usually by telephone. They are subject to re-sale to another party willing to enter into another contract. Most frighteningly, credit default swaps are subject to “counterparty risk.”

If the party providing the insurance protection – once it has collected its upfront payment and premiums – doesn't have the money to pay the insured buyer in the case of a default event affecting the referenced bond or loan (think hedge funds), or if the “insurer” goes bankrupt (Bear Stearns was almost there, and American International Group Inc. (AIG) was almost there) the buyer is not covered – period. The premium payments are gone, as is the insurance against default.

Credit default swaps are not standardized instruments. In fact, they technically aren't true securities in the classic sense of the word in that they're not transparent, aren't traded on any exchange, aren't subject to present securities laws, and aren't regulated. They are, however, at risk – all $62 trillion (the best guess by the ISDA) of them.

Fundamentally, this kind of derivative serves a real purpose – as a hedging device. The actual holders, or creditors, of outstanding corporate or sovereign loans and bonds might seek insurance to guarantee that the debts they are owed are repaid. That's the economic purpose of insurance.

What happened, however, is that risk speculators who wanted exposure to certain asset classes, various bonds and loans, or security pools such as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities (yes, those same subprime mortgage-backed securities that you've been reading about), but didn't actually own the underlying credits, now had a means by which to speculate on them.

If you think XYZ Corp. is in trouble, and won't be able to pay back its bondholders, you can speculate by buying, and paying premiums for, credit default swaps on their bonds, which will pay you the full face amount of the bonds if they do actually default. If, on the other hand, you think that XYZ Corp. is doing just fine, and its bonds are as good as gold, you can offer insurance to a fellow speculator, who holds the opinion opposite yours. That means you'd essentially be speculating that the bonds would not default. You're hoping that you'll collect, and keep, all the premiums, and never have to pay off on the insurance. It's pure speculation.

Credit default swaps are not unlike me being able to insure your house, not with you, but with someone else entirely not connected to your house, so that if your house is washed away in the next hurricane I get paid its value. I'm speculating on an event. I'm making a bet.

The bad news is that there are even worse bets out there. There are credit default swaps written on subprime mortgage securities. It's bad enough that these subprime mortgage pools that banks, investment banks, insurance companies, hedge funds and others bought were over-rated and ended up falling precipitously in value as foreclosures mounted on the underlying mortgages in the pools.

What's even worse, however, is that speculators sold and bought trillions of dollars of insurance that these pools would, or wouldn't, default! The sellers of this insurance (AIG is one example) are getting killed as defaults continue to rise with no end in sight.

And this is only where the story begins.

The Ticking Time Bomb

What is happening in both the stock and credit markets is a direct result of what's playing out in the CDS market. The Fed could not let Bear Stearns enter bankruptcy because – and only because – the trillions of dollars of credit default swaps on its books would be wiped out. All the banks and institutions that had insurance written by Bear would not be able to say that they were insured or hedged anymore and they would have to write-down billions and billions of dollars in losses that they've been carrying at higher values because they could say that they were insured for those losses.

The counterparty risk that all Bear's trading partners were exposed to was so far and wide, and so deep, that if Bear was to enter bankruptcy it would take years to sort out the risk and losses. That was an untenable option.

The Fed had to bail out Bear Stearns.

The same thing has just happened to AIG. Make no mistake about it, there's nothing wrong with AIG's insurance subsidiaries – absolutely nothing. In fact, the Fed just made the best trade in its history by bailing AIG out and getting equity, warrants and charging the insurance giant seven points over the benchmark London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) on that $85 billion loan!

What happened to AIG is simple: AIG got greedy. AIG, as of June 30, had written $441 billion worth of swaps on corporate bonds, and worse, mortgage-backed securities. As the value of these insured-referenced entities fell, AIG had massive write-downs and additionally had to post more collateral. And when its ratings were downgraded on Monday evening, the company had to post even more collateral, which it didn't have.

In short, what happened in one small AIG corporate subsidiary blew apart the largest insurance company in the world.

But there's more – a lot more. These instruments are causing many of the massive write-downs at banks, investment banks and insurance companies. Knowing what all this means for hedge funds, the credit markets and the stock market is the key to understanding where this might end and how.

The rest of the story will be illuminated in the next two installments. Next up: An examination of the AIG collapse, followed by a look at how bad things could get, and what we can do to fix the problem at hand. So stay tuned.

[Editor's Note: Contributing Editor R. Shah Gilani has toiled in the trading pits in Chicago, run trading desks in New York, operated as a broker/dealer and managed everything from hedge funds to currency accounts. In his new column, "Inside Wall Street," Gilani promises to take readers on a journey through the "shadowy back alleys" of the U.S. capital markets - and to conduct us past the "velvet rope" that guards Wall Street's most-valuable secrets - in an ongoing search for the investment ideas with the biggest profit potential. If the whipsaw markets we're experiencing lead to the so-called market “Super Crash” that many analysts fear, shrewd investors won't have to worry. The reason: They will be able to capitalize on the once-in-a-lifetime profit plays that we detail in a new report. For a copy of that report - which includes a free copy of CNBC analyst Peter D. Schiff's New York Times best-seller, "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse" - please click here.]

News and Related Story Links:


Tags: ,

70 Responses

  1. Sunshine Kills Vampires » VOTE: Bail-out preference - GM or Citigroup? | December 5, 2008

    [...] the derivatives, credit default swaps are clearly destabilizing and will be tightly regulated. Many of the new market participants, such [...]

    Reply
  2. For the U.S. Economy in the New Year, the Pain Will Precede the Promise | triggereventstrategist.com | December 8, 2008

    [...] Money Morning Special Investigation of the Credit Crisis (Part I): The Real Reason for the Global Financial Crisis…the Story No One's Talking About. [...]

    Reply
  3. How U.S. Missteps Triggered a Spiral of Worldwide Margin Calls and Deepened the Financial Crisis | triggereventstrategist.com | December 8, 2008

    [...] Yes, collateralized mortgage-backed securities are at the bottom of the crisis. But, the frightening truth is that we can’t even get to them because they are covered so completely by what I’m calling the multiplier catalyst – credit default swaps. I also have offered a simple primer on credit default swaps. [...]

    Reply
  4. Why the $700 Billion Bailout Bill Will Fail U.S. Taxpayers | December 13, 2008

    [...] Money Morning Special Investigation of the Credit Crisis (Part I): The Real Reason for the Global Financial Crisis…the Story No One's Talking About. [...]

    Reply
  5. Don’t Give Up on Gold | December 16, 2008

    [...] parameters have changed, as the increased use of such “derivative” securities as “credit default swaps” has exacerbated the fallout from the global financial crisis, and touched off the [...]

    Reply
  6. Don’t Give Up on Gold | Geiger Index - Keith Fitz-Gerald | December 17, 2008

    [...] the parameters have changed, as the increased use of such “derivative” securities as “credit default swaps” has exacerbated the fallout from the global financial crisis, and touched off the aforementioned [...]

    Reply
  7. Four Ways to Sidestep the Damage Wall Street’s Big Money Movers are Inflicting on Main Street | Geiger Index - Keith Fitz-Gerald | December 18, 2008

    [...] is particularly hard hit and the cost of Russian sovereign-debt-insurance using credit default swaps surged 1200 basis points last week, which makes it higher than the cost of Iceland’s debt before [...]

    Reply
  8. Gerald Spencer | December 19, 2008

    If only we had kept the cash-in/cash-out accounting standards and the gold redemption for our currency.

    Reply
  9. Great Britain - The "Rust Belt" of Global Finance | January 23, 2009

    [...] Money Morning Credit Crisis Investigation (Part I): The Real Reason for the Global Financial Crisis…the Story No One’s Talking About [...]

    Reply
  10. fasieh | February 3, 2009

    Global Financial CRISIS?
    how has securitisation markets and securitised products played a significant role in the global financial crisis?

    one of the widely discussed innovative finance model based on securitisation appears to hae failed. will the financial markets get back to business of securitisation in its present form or with a new face?

    whats the future prospect of securitisation? how do you perceive it?

    Reply
  11. Don’t Give Up on Gold | | February 13, 2009

    [...] the parameters have changed, as the increased use of such “derivative” securities as “credit default swaps” has exacerbated the fallout from the global financial crisis, and touched off the aforementioned [...]

    Reply
  12. Is President Obama's Banking Bailout Plan Destined to be a Dud? | February 20, 2009

    [...] securities collapsed in value, the trillions of dollars of securitized debt now in circulation has become the toxic sludge at the bottom of our financial pit. Geithner is making the false assumption that cleaning up and rebuilding the securitization market [...]

    Reply
  13. Dear Hank: Here's How to End the Credit Crisis at No Cost to Taxpayers | March 30, 2009

    [...] near-financial meltdown that you'll find nowhere else. If you missed Gilani's investigative series, Part I appeared Friday, Part II ran Monday and Part III was published yesterday [...]

    Reply
  14. How Complex Securities, Wall Street Protectionism and Myopic Regulation Caused a Near-Meltdown of the U.S. Banking System | March 30, 2009

    [...] else but in Money Morning. If you missed earlier installments of Gilani's investigative series, Part I appeared Friday, and Part II ran [...]

    Reply
  15. The Government's Financial Crisis Fix-it Plan Sends Stocks Soaring, Though Some Argue There's no Quick Fix for this Disaster | March 30, 2009

    [...] net asset values (NAV) fell below the $1-a-share price paid by investors. [For an in-depth look at the money-market-fund mess, check out a related story elsewhere in today's issue of Money [...]

    Reply
  16. Credit Crisis Expert Says Proposed Plan to Bail Out Delinquent Homeowners May Face Too Many Problems to Succeed | April 1, 2009

    [...] Money Morning Special Investigation of the Credit Crisis (Part I): The Real Reason for the Global Financial Crisis…the Story No One’s Talking About. [...]

    Reply
  17. lisek | May 18, 2009

    For my opinion, the real reason for the global financial crisis is gravity of Jupiter. In years 1997-2000 I have written a program, that calculated current crisis (2008-2010) on (gravity) idea of Chinese calendar, http://alter.sinor.ru/lisek/images/age21.gif

    Reply
  18. The Credit Crisis and the Real Story Behind the Collapse of AIG | December 15, 2009

    [...] manager to provide Money Morning’s readers with the “real story” of the credit crisis. Part I appeared Friday. Part III appears tomorrow (Tuesday). In his new column, "Inside Wall Street," Gilani promises to [...]

    Reply
  19. Evelyn | December 21, 2009

    Why is it that we are in this financial crisis? Because people are spending money we dont have, and not only that but the things that are really messing the people up is using credit cards and such, people are just making things worse for themselves. Why is it?

    Reply
  20. ragz | October 24, 2011

    Very nice article written in easiest terms possible….thank you !!

    Reply


Some HTML is OK