Citigroup Lands Government Rescue Plan

By William Patalon III
Executive Editor
Money Morning/The Money Map Report

Banking giant Citigroup Inc. (C) received $306 billion of U.S. government guarantees for troubled mortgages and toxic assets, in a rescue package that will save the embattled bank from a possible breakup or sale after its stock plunged 60% last week.

Citigroup will also receive a $20 billion cash infusion from the U.S. Treasury Department, which is in addition to the $25 billion the company received last month under the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). In return for the cash and guarantees, the federal government will get $27 billion of preferred shares that pay an 8% dividend. Citigroup shares – which closed Friday at $3.77 each, down 19.96% – jumped $2.18 a share, or 57.82%, to close at $5.95.

The Treasury, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) said in a joint statement that the move aims to bolster financial-market stability and help restore economic growth, Bloomberg News. The decision came after New York-based Citigroup’s tumbling share price sparked concern that depositors might pull their money and destabilize the company, which has $2 trillion of assets and operations in more than 100 countries.

“There will surely be ongoing chatter about a breakup of Citi once the dust settles,” Tom Jenkins, an analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, wrote in a research report today. “For now, though, and indeed for the foreseeable future, Citi has oxygen.”

Nader Naeimi, a Sydney-based strategist at AMP Capital Investors, which manages about $85 billion, told Bloomberg that the rescue plan “really was a must-do thing. If they’d let Citigroup go, that would’ve been disastrous.”

The assets that may be “guaranteed” by the government are part of roughly $400 billion worth of auto loan, bonds, corporate loans, mortgages and other assets that Citi Chief Executive Officer Vikram S. Pandit back in May said the banking giant would dispose of within three years. Regulators and bank officials spent the weekend discussing just how much of those assets will be covered under any new plan.

“If anybody’s too big to fail from the financial system’s point of view, it’s Citi,” said Brian Barish, president of Cambiar Investments LLC in Denver, which manages about $6 billion, told Bloomberg over the weekend. “The government doesn’t need to be in this to make money. If they lose a few bucks on this, but save the system, it’ll be worth it.”

Citigroup was especially hard hit by the meltdown in risky, subprime mortgages made to people with low incomes or lousy credit. Foreclosures on those mortgages spiked, leaving Citi and other financial companies to choke down huge losses on the soured investments.

The company lost 60% of its market value last week as investor confidence in the New York-based company’s prospects faltered after four consecutive quarterly losses. The worry was that, without a way of arresting that slide, the market-value loss may rattle Citigroup’s customers, counterparties and employees – even threatening the operations of the second-biggest U.S. bank by assets, according to a report by David Hendler, an analyst at CreditSights Inc. in New York.

Citigroup’s stock has plunged 83% this year and dropped below $5 last week for the first time since 1995. The shares were up $1.26 at $5.03 in Germany in recent trading.

Citigroup shareholders will be diluted in the “near term by the cost of the incremental preferred stock,” Morgan Stanley (MS) analysts Betsy Graseck and Cheryl Pate wrote in a report today.

The Citi deal is merely a variation on a theme that has played out in government interventions during the past year, including the purchase by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) of The Bear Stearns Cos., Citigroup’s failed effort to buy Wachovia Corp. (WB) banking branches (but now the ho, and the Swiss government’s rescue financing of UBS AG (UBS). In each case, the government required the suitor to agree to absorb a certain level of initial losses, with the Treasury Department agreeing to guarantee deficits beyond that amount.

For instance, JPMorgan took the first $1.15 billion of losses on a $30 billion portfolio of Bear Stearns’s devalued assets, with the Fed agreeing to finance the rest. And back in the fall, Citi agreed to suffer the first $42 billion of losses on Wachovia’s loan portfolio, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) taking the rest, in a deal that was canceled after Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) jumped over Citi to buy all of Wachovia.
Citi’s failure to secure Wachovia has been widely attributed as having exacerbated the big bank’s decline.

The Swiss government required UBS in October to inject $4.91 billion into a special purpose vehicle (SPV) backed with $54 billion of central bank loans to allow the bank to carve off about $60 billion of assets.

News and Related Story Links:


Tags:

11 Responses

  1. Web Smith | November 24, 2008

    Unlike the auto bailout, this bailout doesn't allow us to keep jobs or generate commerce plus, they were not adversely affected by the economic crisis. They caused it. After already giving them $25 billion, they are still foreclosing on our homes, charging us loan shark rates on our credit cards, and refusing to loan money to business resulting in more lost jobs and no commerce whatsoever. We should first demand a management change and a plan. What is to guarantee that, after we bail them out, they don't just go out and do the same things that got them to this point all over again only to have us left holding a lot of worthless stock. Get rid of those corporate jets and the high salaries and bonuses. Otherwise this is just more money after bad.

    http://ewebsmith.com/gov/BankBailOut.html

    Reply
  2. Billions in U.S. Bank Rescue Funds are Fueling Buyouts Worldwide – Instead of Lending at Home | December 5, 2008

    [...] This all happens without any of the economic benefits that an actual increase in lending would have had. And it does nothing to address the billions worth of illiquid securities that remain on (or off) banks’ balance sheets – as the recent Citigroup Inc. (C) imbroglio demonstrates. [...]

    Reply
  3. Jutia Group - Market Jitters & Political Critters | January 5, 2009

    [...] Citigroup shares rose 6.4% to close at $7.14 after the bank revealed it would not be paying bonuses to its top executives [For more details on the Citi announcement, check out this related story in today’s issue of Money Morning]. Financial stocks also got a boost from a report that the U.S. Treasury Department said it would consider insuring toxic assets at large firms from unlimited future losses, just as it did for Citigroup in November. [...]

    Reply
  4. Corporate Bankruptcies Will be a Key Investor Concern in the New Year | January 7, 2009

    [...] financial-sector giants American International Group Inc. (AIG) and Citigroup Inc. (C) were both bailed out a vast expense to [...]

    Reply
  5. TARP Bailout Funds Being Used to Buy Other Banks, Not Lend to Consumers « War on the Home Front | January 13, 2009

    [...] This all happens without any of the economic benefits that an actual increase in lending would have had. And it does nothing to address the billions worth of illiquid securities that remain on (or off) banks’ balance sheets – as the recent Citigroup Inc. (C) imbroglio demonstrates. [...]

    Reply
  6. War on the Home Front » Blog Archive » TARP Bailout Funds Being Used to Buy Other Banks, Not Lend to Consumers | January 18, 2009

    [...] This all happens without any of the economic benefits that an actual increase in lending would have had. And it does nothing to address the billions worth of illiquid securities that remain on (or off) banks’ balance sheets – as the recent Citigroup Inc. (C) imbroglio demonstrates. [...]

    Reply
  7. Citigroup Splits Up After Fifth Straight Quarterly Loss | January 18, 2009

    [...] Money Morning: Citigroup Lands Government Rescue Plan [...]

    Reply
  8. As Resurgent U.S. Banks Shift Into Profit Mode, Hitch a Ride With These Two for Gangbuster Returns | March 18, 2009

    [...] regional banks have been coping quite well with their impaired-value assets, Citigroup has been forced to get a $300 billion guarantee on its assets from the Fed, and nobody knows if even that will be enough. The bank is now [...]

    Reply
  9. Fraud and Greed of Trusted Rating Agencies Helped Spread the Credit Crisis | April 8, 2009

    [...] of American International Group Inc.(AIG), and a few other minor nap-interrupting events, including the bailout of Citigroup Inc. (C). I’m only sorry that the Commission’s disjointed hibernation should once again be [...]

    Reply
  10. Fraud and Greed of Trusted Rating Agencies Helped Spread the Credit Crisis | December 15, 2009

    [...] of American International Group Inc.(AIG), and a few other minor nap-interrupting events, including the bailout of Citigroup Inc. (C). I’m only sorry that the Commission’s disjointed hibernation should once again be [...]

    Reply
  11. joseph mckenna | April 6, 2010

    Can you verify that the IRS ruled shares of Citigroup are not taxable.

    Reply


Some HTML is OK