Fixed-Income Investing: A Cheaper, Safer Alternative to Equity Indexed Annuities

By Keith Fitz-Gerald
Investment Director
Money Morning/The Money Map Report

For many investors, the concept of an equity indexed annuity (EIA for short) – which establishes a guaranteed minimum rate of return, and the ability to capture the upside of the next bull market with no risk of loss – is proving irresistible. That's especially true at a time when the Standard & Poor's 500 Index is still down nearly 45% from its 2007 high of 157.52 and new U.S. President Barack Obama's stimulus plan has yet to be finalized.

But at the risk of receiving more than a few sharp emails from industry professionals who sell EIAs, let me tell you that you can achieve virtually the same degree of financial security using nothing fancier than a certificate of deposit (CD) and the SPDR Trust (SPY), which trades on the American Stock Exchange.

 Here's what you need to know.

First created on Feb. 15, 1995, equity indexed annuities are insurance products that typically promise a set minimum income level or rate of return, plus the ability to capture market gains without any risk of losing money. Theoretically, they're easy to understand.

You invest a lump sum for a fixed-time period – often 10 years or more – and in return receive a guaranteed minimum rate of return, plus the market upside, with none of the losses if it goes down.

If the market to which an EIA is indexed – like the S&P 500 – rises by more than the minimum promised return, your money is supposed to grow proportionately. In exchange for making the investment, the insurance company offering the EIA guarantees that your money will never drop in value.

The devil, as they say, is in the details.

In reality, the paperwork that explains equity-indexed annuities is one of the toughest financial documents of all to decipher and understand. Not only are the sales documents filled with legalese, but assuming you can get through the 40 to 60 pages of stuff that comes with an EIA, chances are you'll find a wide range of conditions, restrictions and terms that frequently change over time. There are guaranteed minimums, performance adjustments, participation rates, interest-rate caps and spreads to contend with, for instance. And that's just a sampling.

In addition, many EIA's also cap the returns you can achieve, no matter how far the markets rise, which would seem to defeat the purpose of investing in one of these things in the first place. And that means, more often than not, that you'll be left in the dust if the markets really take off.

To put this into context, if you invest in an EIA with a performance cap of 10% and the markets actually rise 20%, you'll leave over 50% of possible gains in the insurance company's pockets … not yours.

Then there are the associated fees and charges, which are quite hefty. In fact, various studies suggest that the purchase of an annuity typically results in a wealth transfer of as much as 15% to 20% from the investors who buy them to the insurance companies and the sales forces who sell them. That's something not a lot of folks realize when they consider purchasing one of these specialized investments.

Despite these shortcomings, sales of EIAs are better than ever. According to Jack Marrion of Advantage Compendium Ltd. (www.indexannuity.org), investors have plowed more than $123 billion into equity indexed annuities. He added that "more than 90% of EIAs are sold by independent agents," like one I spoke with who privately told me that sales are "up 25% in the last 6 months alone."

Another insurance company representative, who also wished to remain anonymous, told me that "fear rules the day, and we know that, so it's only logical to assume that we'll sell more EIAs when people are scared."

Sad but true.

Many investors I've talked to over the years tell me that they find it especially frustrating that no two EIAs are exactly alike, which is why apples-to-apples comparisons are next to impossible.  The same is true for performance comparison, even if two competing offerings are tracking an identical index, such as the S&P 500.

The bottom line on EIAs is that the returns you think you'll be getting if the markets rise may be nothing more than an illusion once all the contractual details are netted out. They're basically being sold as alternatives to stocks, when the reality is that they're much more of a bond-related instrument.

In the interest of fairness, EIAs have outperformed the S&P 500 over the last nine years, something Miguel Herce of CRA International points out in the January 2009 issue of Money magazine. But over time – 63% of the time since 1926, to be specific – the markets would have beaten EIAs.

Various studies reinforce this notion. One, in particular, conducted jointly by Dr. Craig McCann of UCLA and Dr. Dengpan Luo of Yale University, reflects that investors would be better off in a simple portfolio of U.S. Treasuries and large cap stocks – a whopping 97% of the time.

Boston University Economics Professor Laurence J. Kotlikoff summed it up nicely, noting in Money that "some of these products might pay off, but even a PhD in finance can't tell you if it's worth it because the returns are almost entirely at the discretion of the insurance company [that's offering the EIAs]."

Which is why we've never been big fan of these things.

But if the notion of a guaranteed return and all the market's upside strikes you as compelling right now – like it does us – here's a dramatically simpler and far less expensive way to achieve financial tranquility.

  • First, visit CostCo.com (or your local bank). When I checked, the company was offering Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) insured seven-year CD paying 5.05% APY through Capital One Financial Corp. (COF). Assuming you've got $20,000 to invest, you'll need to plop down ~$14,166.34 now to have $20,000 in seven years. (You can run whatever numbers you want using financial calculators available on the Internet).
  • Second, take the remaining $5,833.66 and buy the SPY exchange-traded fund (ETF), which tracks the S&P 500.

That's it. No extravagant fees. No surrender charges. And, most importantly, no upside-performance caps.

Plus, your investment is now guaranteed by the FDIC, which strikes me as a whole lot safer than a comparable EIA, which incidentally is only as good as the insurance company backing it. And lately, that's suspect to say the least.

Worst case scenario, you get your $20,000 back in seven years. Best case, if stocks recover from here and achieve 7% annually for the next seven years, you'll earn an additional $9,367.58, making your grand total $29,367.58.

What's more, because there's no complicated contract involved, you will understand what you're getting into from the get go, and will get to keep 100% of the potential gains to boot.

In closing, it's worth noting that EIAs are frequently touted as tax-advantaged investments in an attempt to make them more appealing. But if you simply buy the CD and the SPY in your IRA, you're achieving the much the same thing – but without the 9% commission.

[Editor's Note: Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald is the editor of the new Geiger Index trading service. As the whipsaw trading patterns investors have endured this year have shown, the ongoing global financial crisis has changed the investment game forever.

Uncertainty is now the norm and that new reality alone has created a whole set of new rules that will help determine who profits and who loses. Investors who ignore this "New Reality" will struggle, and will find their financial forays to be frustrating and unrewarding. But investors who embrace this change will not only survive - they will thrive. With the Geiger Index, Fitz-Gerald has already isolated these new rules and has unlocked the key to what he refers to as "The Golden Age of Wealth Creation." The Geiger Index system allows Fitz-Gerald to predict the price movements of broad indexes, or of individual stocks, with a high degree of certainty. And it's particularly well suited to the kind of market we're all facing right now. Check out our latest report on these new rules, and on this new market environment.]

News and Related Story Links:


Tags: ,

11 Responses

  1. robert zimmerman | February 3, 2009

    In my book, I make a similar comparison to yours: I call it the 'racetrack' annuity.

    You are right – these babies are complicated to explain, and I believe there will be a lot of disenchanted buyers in the future.

    However, there are many redeeming features of insurance contracts, not limited to the tax aspects. If you would like a complimentary copy of my book, let me know.

    Reply
  2. Gerry Kurth | February 3, 2009

    Excellent article on indexed annuities! I have several comments:

    Crediting methods – The crediting methods used to allow the insurance companies to hedge the equity positions consist of spreads, participation rates and caps. Fair enough. The problem is that they reserve the right to change those published caps at their sole discretion. It's called "retroactivity."

    Impartial analysis – For an impartial and scientific analysis, there is a website (Personalyze.org) where individuals can use a free "EIAnalyzer." This lets you view Credit Method Ratings information on approximately 600 EIA product profiles to confirm the value of the expected return presented by an advisor. It's unclear how the insurance company discretionary changes are handled.

    Taxes – The tax deferral is, in fact, a benefit of these contracts. On the other hand, all gains are taxed as ordinary income.

    Maturity dates – Most annuities have a 5-10 year maturity, longer than common CD's. However, unlike CD's, they usually allow a 10% annual withdrawal.

    Licensing requiremets – For many unspophisticated investors, the ability to "get a guaranteed minimum rate of return, and the ability to capture the upside of the next bull market with no risk of loss" is too good to pass up. Many buy these products from zealous salesman who are offered up to 10% commissions without the knowledge to ask about the fine print. For that reason, the SEC has just decreed that these products will be regulated by the SEC, rather than the more lenient insurance commissions.

    The move is the latest attempt by regulators to curb fraudulent sales to senior citizens. The major push started last year when the SEC conducted a joint-sweep of so-called free lunch seminars that targeted seniors for investments. Since then, the regulators have stepped up their rule making efforts as well as their enforcement actions to protect those nvestors.

    Undoubtedly, there are several products out there whicjh offer a fair business proposition, but too many are geared to generate revenue for the insurance componies.

    Gerry Kurth, Ph.D.
    GPK111@HOTMAIL.COM

    Reply
    • MICHAEL DAPUZZO | December 16, 2010

      MR . KURTH IS IT TRUE YOU RECEIVED YOUR DEGREE FROM LA SALLE UNIVERSITY IN THE MIDWEST YOU KNOW THE NON ACCRETED PLACE ; THE UNIV. WHERE IT'S CHANCELOR WAS ARRESTED FOR FRAUD , SO I GUESS THAT MAKES YOU A FRAUD POSING AS A Ph. D WHEN IN FACT YOUR DEGREE IS NOT WORTH THE PAPER IT'S WRITTEN ON.

      MICHAEL DAPUZZO (FELON)

      Reply
  3. D Rinehart | February 3, 2009

    It amazes me when people write an article about indexed annuities that they act surprised that the upside potential is limited??? These are fixed annuities. The index link offers the potential for slightly higher return in a SAFE MONEY vehicle. Why would anyone expect all the upside with complete protection from downside risk???? (risk vs. reward) You are of course are entitled to your option, but in a period of time with tremendous market losses and bonds at historical highs, your advise seems quite bias. No one that owns a indexed annuity and "stayed the course", to use an investment buzz word, has lost a dime! Forget the minimum guarantees… Zero is your hero in this environment. Why don't you ask your readers how many of them would, if the could, go back to Jan 2008 and lock in a 0% return for the year? By the way, the potential for future interest crediting is reset at policy anniversary on most policies, meaning that when the market does turn, the buyer can realize gains as the market grows back to higher levels. Instead of recouping previous losses they will see gains.

    These products are not for every saver, but offer tremendous benefits for long term, safe money retirement planning.

    Reply
  4. Gerry Kurth | February 3, 2009

    The comment is hawking a book and the second one is a well written, but biased and retrospective view of an investment environment where EIA's would have fared well. Hardly a scientific, forward looking financial analysis. Sorry.

    Reply
  5. Dennis Grothaus | February 3, 2009

    I am so disappointed in your article in EIA's. You have mislead your readers and it is so inaccurate. You are not comparing apples to apples. It is true EIA's have outperformed the S&P market since their inception. But you are wrong to make the assumption that had they been available for 63 years they would not have outperformed. How can you make that statement when they did not exist so you have no way of knowing what interest rate caps would have been available. My EIA has no fees, provides a 10% penalty free withdrawal each year while it is in its surrender schedule of 6 -10 years, which is a key benefit and something a CD does not provide. It provides tax deferral which a CD does not provide (unless you hold a CD inside an IRA, which again is not an apples to apples comparison. And just as beneficial and important for an EIA or any annuity, which you fail to mention is the lifetime guaranteed income the EIA provides. My EIA provides this income and I do not have to 'annuitize ' my EIA to get this income stream guarantee. Even after income distributions start, I can still take a 100% lump sum per whatever balance is left. The EIA I have has averaged 8.4% average returns historically and it was never presented as a stock market securities product. It is just a way to peg the interst rate to an index, usually earning a much better rate than what one can get in a traditional CD over time. In fact it has a 1 year minimum guaranteed interest rate in the fixed account which is better than most 1 year CD rates. Each year, I have the option of moving any money from this fixed rate bucket back into the bucket where the interst rate earned is indexed to the S&P, a smart thing to do if we are in a bull market. It is a win-win situation for a conservative investor.
    Based on your comment about FDIC insurance, it seems you have been sucked into the same lie banks have been promoting for years. First, FDIC insurance requires banks only keep a very small percentage of their deposits available, something like 1%. They loan the rest out to people who can not afford their McMansions, forclose, etc. The banks were so greedy many did not even due their due diligence and verify a loan applicants employment before approving these mortgages. Insurance regulations require insurance company's keep 100% on reserve, dollar for dollar. If they fall below these requirements, the State Department of Insurance steps in until the requirements are met. I have seen banks go under and just because there is FDIC insurance does not mean an investor will get his or her money back right away. Typically, when a bank fails, the depositors can easily wait a year before they get all their money back from the FDIC. Let's not forget it was the banks that failed in the great depression and it was the insurance companies that bailed them out, not the US Government. FDIC did not exist yet. Note the key words in FDIC is "Insurance and Corporation." FDIC is not the US Government. I find it interesting that what is backing the deposits in the bank is an insurance company and you seem to infer banks are safer than the insurance companies. Also, the economic mess we are in now was once again brought on by the greedy banks and their mismanagement, not insurance companies. I feel much safer investing with a good insurance company any day than a bank.

    Reply
  6. Jutia Group - Market Jitters & Political Critters | February 3, 2009

    [...] Keith Fitz-Gerald Money Morning addthis_pub = 'jutiagroup'; addthis_logo = 'http://www.jutiagroup.com/favicon.ico'; addthis_brand [...]

    Reply
  7. Robert Head | February 3, 2009

    You might want to elaborate on the "associated fees and charges". And while you're at it, why don't you elaborate on the power of zero aspect which allows for annual resets on certain index annuity products. Futhermore, why in the world would you want to invest in a 7 year cd right now with the prospect of significantly higher rates? Your analysis has serious flaws. You might want to entertain a little more due diligence!

    Reply
  8. Mark | February 3, 2009

    I would like to respond to the EIA comments made above and in fairness to all reading, I am an investment professional but my comments will not fall completely in line with others in the same field. I think that the plethora of financial products that exist, exist for more than only the purpose of making money for someone (hopefully, the client, the company, and the person selling the investment, I lean more toward the client). Different investment product types exist because different people feel differently about risk and that will never change. You are right about SOME EIA's being complicated. Personally, the only EIA I sell (by choice) allows for 100% participation, decent caps, lower commissions, no fees charged to the client, and a short, 5-year surrender charge. I always recommend that clients considering a purchase look primarily at the annual reset versus some of the other exotic methods that are out there, which in my opinion are for show only, the majority of the time don't outperform the easy-to-understand annual reset, and most of the time, the person selling the other more complicated methods, can't explain them properly. I personally have been selling more variable annuities with living benefits guarantees rather than alot of EIA's lately. True these are not right for everyone either but at least it takes away the argument that if the markets truly do take off in a mighty way, you do have the same upside potential that mutual funds have while still protecting your income. I want my clients to sleep well and feel comfortable with where there money is. Every investment is right for somebody, but no investment is right for everybody. Do the right thing for the client, and this discussion is basically a moog point.

    Reply
  9. M.Forgach | February 3, 2009

    Your ignorance about these products is amazing for someone who purports to be a financial professional. I sell these and without question every client is extremely happy they were in these. They have made a good return and not lost a penny as many investors have. I now question anything you write if you can make so many errors.

    Reply
  10. Retirement Investing: How Bear Markets Can Help Your Retirement Planning | February 4, 2009

    [...] Money Morning: Fixed-Income Investing: A Cheaper, Safer Alternative to Equity Indexed Annuities [...]

    Reply


Some HTML is OK