Retirement Investing: How Bear Markets Can Help Your Retirement Planning

By Martin Hutchinson
Contributing Editor
Money Morning

If you save for retirement through a 401(k) plan, or have large IRA or Keogh Plan assets, you probably hurled your last statement in the bin. If you'd been making contributions consistently over the last decade, your last annual or monthly statement probably showed that the current value of your plan was well below the amount you had actually invested.

At this point, the temptation to work as long as possible, and then blow what remains of your savings on a round-the-world cruise and a suicide pill is considerable.

However, such despair is unwarranted.

Unless you have already given up all paid employment, or absolutely have to retire in the next year or two, the current bear market may have made your eventual retirement prospects more secure, not less.

You see, the most damaging factor for your retirement happiness was not the current downturn, but the preceding decade-long bubble.

Let me explain. 

Savers who devote an equal amount each month to their long-term plans benefit from an important mathematical principle: Dollar cost averaging. Under dollar cost averaging, you put in the same amount of money each month, so that amount buys more shares if prices are low than it does if prices are high.

Thus, if a mutual fund trades at $1 in month one, $2 in month two and $1.50 in month three, then a dollar-cost-averaging investor investing $300 per month will buy 300 shares in month one, 150 in month two and 200 in month three. After his month three investment, he will own 650 shares at a cost of $900, for an average cost of $1.3846. Since the average price of the shares over the three months was month three's $1.50, he has made an extra $0.1154 per share compared with the average share price.

That's why prolonged bull markets are so bad for retirement investors (unless they are lucky enough to retire before the bubble bursts). In this case, the Standard and Poor's 500 Index stood at 459.27 at the end of 1994. Then after February 1995, when U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan moved to an ever-easing monetary policy with low interest rates, it took off for the stratosphere.  It passed its current level of 825 in early 1996, and except for a short period in 2002 has traded above that level ever since.

So, even though retirement savers from 1996-2008 thought most of the time that they were doing very well, in reality they were buying shares at an over-inflated price, and just about every one of their monthly contributions is currently showing a loss.

It's not the current bear market that has caused that loss. Stock prices in 1996-2008 were always at excessive prices, so a major correction was bound to happen sometime. If the correction had happened in December 1996, when Greenspan made his famous "irrational exuberance" speech, the market would have on average been substantially lower over the subsequent 12 years. And a retirement investor who had saved over that period would be substantially richer today because he would have owned significantly more shares of the mutual fund in which he had invested.

The wise retirement savers who have a few years to go should hope the current lower stock prices stick around, maybe even go lower still provided they recover before they has to draw on the savings or convert them into an annuity. By continuing to invest regularly at these lower prices, the return from dividends and capital appreciation will compound more quickly, particularly if they buy stocks that have a substantial dividend yield.

Even if their savings remain adequate, they shouldn't convert them into an annuity because annuity rates are currently very low. With long-term Treasury bonds yielding less than 3%, actuaries factor that exceptionally low return into their annuity calculations.

Right now, a 65-year-old man who buys an annuity can expect to receive only around $74 per $1,000 of investment, without any protection for inflation or guaranteed minimum return if he dies quickly. Once interest rates rise, as they are almost bound to, that annuity rate will rise in step with them.

Rather than convert into an annuity, the retirement saver should simply invest in stocks that are both solid and yield more than 7.4% – and there are still plenty of them out there. That way, he can achieve the same return as an annuity while preserving, and maybe even increasing, his principal – in addition of course to any further monthly payments he can make while still working.

By building a portfolio of such stocks including a selection from emerging markets, he can take advantages of the higher-dividend payouts frequently found outside the United States.

Finding stocks with dividend yields equal to or greater than an annuity yield was tough when the S&P 500 was at 1400. But at 800, it's a lot easier, even if you want to avoid the financial sector for obvious prudential reasons.

Such solid companies as General Electric Co. (GE), BP PLC (ADR: BP), Du Pont (DD), Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL) and Limited Brands Inc. (LTD) yield well over 7% currently, and that's without venturing into emerging markets companies.

If your retirement portfolio has been decimated, don't despair. At these lower stock prices it will be much easier to build its value up again, and because stock yields are higher you won't need so much capital to generate the income you want to live well.

News and Related Story Links:

More on this topic (What's this?)
dconjar
Simple Retirement Calculator
Read more on Retirement at Wikinvest

Tags:

3 Responses

  1. JP Sherwood | February 4, 2009

    Dear Martin Hutchinson,
    I enjoyed reading your article. Although we are experiencing a very "interesting" market, I would think we would not violate the golden rule of buy low and sell high. I think the best support we could offer those building a retirement account would be to become vigilant and good stewards of their money, and not to ride the wave of the bear.

    I would like to make a point that no matter what your financial status is, why would you want to be in a long position when the underlying asset is going down? What your telling people to do is to hold their positions and buy more of a losing stock in order to lower your losses by averaging your already losing stocks with more losing stocks at a lower price?

    The advice I am hearing, in which I hope is not true, is that you are suggesting people to not rely on a system that is in a bearish condition, but to maintain a long term investing strategy that is failing. I understand that people have jobs; they have lives, and cannot devote all the time in the world to their portfolios. But if you are the owner of a 401k or an IRA worth 6 figures, is it smart to ignore it, misguide it, and lose it over bad advice and carelessness?

    I moved all my money into a cash position before the feces hit the fan in late 2008. Doing this took less than 5 minutes. Guess how much money I lost? Zero. Now guess how much more money I have to reinvest in those discounted funds. A whole lot more than I would have if I “rode the wave”.

    Now with your picks. Long term, GE has been in a downturn since November 2007! It was about $40 per share November 7th, 2007. As of February 3, 2008, it is at $11.43 a share. How is that smart? If I invested $10k, I would have lost nearly 75%! What am I going to do, wait another year and a half to get my money back? Real solid.

    Why not take a little time with educating, transfer your 401k to a self-directed account, hire a reliable accountant, and do covered calls with that great stock you are hawking. At least this way, you can earn 5-10% A MONTH selling the options for the current month. It is a hell of a lot safer than holding that stock for two years. Not to mention you would recover that 75% loss.

    Let’ say you earned a meager 3% return doing a covered call with GE, with that great 75% loss we saw, at least with a covered call, your losses would have dropped to only 30%.

    Now what if you found a strong reliable company that was overall trending upwards for the last 15 months. Earning 3% now would give you a ROI of 45% in 15 months! The worst that can happen is the stock goes lower, in which you let the option expire and resell it again next month, or the stock goes up, and you still profit.

    Let’s help these people by guiding them in the RIGHT direction.

    Reply
  2. James Yamaki | February 9, 2009

    I have a 457 plan (deferred compensation plan for government employees). I am 68 and will not be tapping this fund until required by law when I reach seventy and a half years of age. I cannot put any more money into this plan because I am no longer earning income. The only move I can make is switching funds to increase my assets.

    I draw my retirement income from a defined contribution plan, social security, stock dividends and rental property.

    When the stock market was tanking in 2008, I decided to transfer all my assets in deferred comp to a stable value fund which was yielding 5 percent without any charge for switching funds. This is the beauty of these plans: you can switch funds back and forth very easily without paying any fees.

    I lost some of my assets, but was able to stop the bleeding to protect my position.

    In January, I decided to go back to mutual funds in my deferred comp plan and switched back part of my assets, again without paying any fees for the change. By hindsight, it was a little too early, but it's okay. I'll just sit tight and hope for the best.

    My stock portfolio got creamed! I lost 49% from the peak in October 2007 to end of 2008. It's okay. The market should recover one of these days. In the meantime, I still collect good dividends from stocks like Verizon(VZ) and HRPT Trust (HRP), SK Telecom(SKM) and iShare Taiwan (EWT).

    I have a fixed annuity that is yielding about 3.20%. In 2003, when I retired, I had a choice to invest that lump sum money into stocks or into the fixed annuity. I chose fixed annuity and now am I so glad I made that decision instead of being greedy and trying to maximize my returns investing in stocks. The assets are in a positive position and next year (holding period of 7 years) I should be able to withdraw all the amount without paying any penalty for early withdrawl.

    The best way to manage your assets is to be diversified: invest in all kind of ways and don't put all your eggs in a single basket.

    Thanks for all the good advice you share with your readers. They are helpful in making us better managers of our assets.

    You have excellent feedback too.

    Reply
  3. Martin Stevens | February 16, 2009

    Im not a very savvy investor like the previous respondents but I happened to borrow approximately $22,000 out of my 403 b before the crash and have been paying it back in biweekly payments deducted from my paycheck towards the loan balance. If Im not mistaken the amount of shares I am " reactivating " in this bear market is greater than what was cashed out to borrow from the 403. Does this make sense and I ought to end up with a larger number of shares right?

    Reply


Some HTML is OK