<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internodal</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-55848</link>
		<dc:creator>Internodal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-55848</guid>
		<description>Invest in Gold and Silver.  Pure and simple.  It&#039;s the only way you will ever see the colour of your money again in the future.  Foreign countries are piling up on Gold.  The currency of the Elite (the so-called top 1% of the top 1%) is GOLD AND SILVER.  They laugh at the bogus fiat paper currencies of the world.  Gold and Silver is the way to go.  Any other investment is only worth the paper it&#039;s printed on.  And, because most of it is digital these days, I should say any other investment is not even worth the paper it&#039;s not printed on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invest in Gold and Silver.  Pure and simple.  It's the only way you will ever see the colour of your money again in the future.  Foreign countries are piling up on Gold.  The currency of the Elite (the so-called top 1% of the top 1%) is GOLD AND SILVER.  They laugh at the bogus fiat paper currencies of the world.  Gold and Silver is the way to go.  Any other investment is only worth the paper it's printed on.  And, because most of it is digital these days, I should say any other investment is not even worth the paper it's not printed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-27256</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-27256</guid>
		<description>In reply to Sharon Warden of Feb 19,2009,  her query--&quot;What is the status of First National Bank of Omaha?&quot; First National Bank Omaha was DENIED TARP funds, as was National City Bank just before it collapsed.These two banks were the ONLY TWO AMERICAN banks DENIED BAILOUT FUNDS, and ask yourself WHY were they denied TARP? Financial crimes? Is it insolvent? Yes, likely reasons. The entire sector died of debt years ago, and needs the taxpayer&#039;s money to continue to exist(and exist to fee the taxpayer to death!). PS:First National Bank Omaha&#039;s credit card APR in 2007 was 33%!!!!This was the bank that helped build the zombie fraud ENRON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Sharon Warden of Feb 19,2009,  her query&#8211;"What is the status of First National Bank of Omaha?" First National Bank Omaha was DENIED TARP funds, as was National City Bank just before it collapsed.These two banks were the ONLY TWO AMERICAN banks DENIED BAILOUT FUNDS, and ask yourself WHY were they denied TARP? Financial crimes? Is it insolvent? Yes, likely reasons. The entire sector died of debt years ago, and needs the taxpayer's money to continue to exist(and exist to fee the taxpayer to death!). PS:First National Bank Omaha's credit card APR in 2007 was 33%!!!!This was the bank that helped build the zombie fraud ENRON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-17531</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-17531</guid>
		<description>I know this comment is out of place and out of sink with anyone who would read this news letter but I feel it must be said.

I look at a bank has a place to operate my business and personal finances from and not a place to invest into other then where I leave a little savings. They have become incredulous over the last 20 years. To the point of criminal. Their rates, terms, fee schedules, and policy changes have cause everything we have seen in these last 9 years with help of our government leadership which had their head in the sand I believe or worst their hand out. The simplest of solutions will work best: The break up of these banks as they exist now back to the day when investment houses, insurance industries, and true banks (lenders and mortgage providers) were not allow to partner. The reinstatement of lost anti trust legislation. The revisiting of Fee limits and interest rate ceilings. And limiting foreign banks (not to mention foreign investors) which do not have the same limitations as their American counter parts. We need a strong regulatory system looking at the banks books and making it policy to have congress examine any loan or policy changes a federally insured bank makes. Imagine your mortgage rate was to change over night and their was nothing you could do. Oh basically that is why we are in this mess. But the American people did something they said FU and they are about to do the same with their credit cards debt get ready. The fact that they haven&#039;t already tells you something about most Americans. If our concern is to strengthen the American economy and we had used that same money allocated to the banks toward our infer-structure, key manufacturing industries (which have been under tremendous unfair competition by foreign propped upped competitors), first time small business low rate loans (like a student loan program) and on new or self sufficient energy resources, Which would of had a better short and long term effect on this countries economy and way of life? If we get out of this mess relatively unscathed it will be in spite of what we do to help those dysfunctional banks (and the current banking system as it stands today) and not because we saved them. Save the deposits (which in inflated dollars is about 1,000,000 per account) that is what the promise was not the investor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this comment is out of place and out of sink with anyone who would read this news letter but I feel it must be said.</p>
<p>I look at a bank has a place to operate my business and personal finances from and not a place to invest into other then where I leave a little savings. They have become incredulous over the last 20 years. To the point of criminal. Their rates, terms, fee schedules, and policy changes have cause everything we have seen in these last 9 years with help of our government leadership which had their head in the sand I believe or worst their hand out. The simplest of solutions will work best: The break up of these banks as they exist now back to the day when investment houses, insurance industries, and true banks (lenders and mortgage providers) were not allow to partner. The reinstatement of lost anti trust legislation. The revisiting of Fee limits and interest rate ceilings. And limiting foreign banks (not to mention foreign investors) which do not have the same limitations as their American counter parts. We need a strong regulatory system looking at the banks books and making it policy to have congress examine any loan or policy changes a federally insured bank makes. Imagine your mortgage rate was to change over night and their was nothing you could do. Oh basically that is why we are in this mess. But the American people did something they said FU and they are about to do the same with their credit cards debt get ready. The fact that they haven't already tells you something about most Americans. If our concern is to strengthen the American economy and we had used that same money allocated to the banks toward our infer-structure, key manufacturing industries (which have been under tremendous unfair competition by foreign propped upped competitors), first time small business low rate loans (like a student loan program) and on new or self sufficient energy resources, Which would of had a better short and long term effect on this countries economy and way of life? If we get out of this mess relatively unscathed it will be in spite of what we do to help those dysfunctional banks (and the current banking system as it stands today) and not because we saved them. Save the deposits (which in inflated dollars is about 1,000,000 per account) that is what the promise was not the investor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Morning’s Bank Stress Test Says These Three Banks Are the Strongest</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-9219</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning’s Bank Stress Test Says These Three Banks Are the Strongest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-9219</guid>
		<description>[...] in February, I looked at the Top 12 U.S. banks, to determine whether it was really necessary &#8211; as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in February, I looked at the Top 12 U.S. banks, to determine whether it was really necessary &#8211; as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can U.S. Bank Stocks Double Again in 2010?</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-8611</link>
		<dc:creator>Can U.S. Bank Stocks Double Again in 2010?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-8611</guid>
		<description>[...] SPDR (NYSE: XLF) Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) since that time, one thing is clear: If you&#8217;d followed my advice you would have more than doubled your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SPDR (NYSE: XLF) Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) since that time, one thing is clear: If you'd followed my advice you would have more than doubled your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economics Should Take Priority Over Politics at Weekend G20 Meeting</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5377</link>
		<dc:creator>Economics Should Take Priority Over Politics at Weekend G20 Meeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5377</guid>
		<description>[...] last month, Hutchinson published an analysis on the &quot;Top 12 U.S. banks&quot; report. If you missed story, which enjoyed a big response when it was published last Wednesday, please [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last month, Hutchinson published an analysis on the &quot;Top 12 U.S. banks&quot; report. If you missed story, which enjoyed a big response when it was published last Wednesday, please [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bank Stock Outlook: Will First-Half Gains Give Way to Second-Half Pain?</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5375</link>
		<dc:creator>Bank Stock Outlook: Will First-Half Gains Give Way to Second-Half Pain?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5375</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning Special Investing Research Report:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning Special Investing Research Report:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA Jones</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5376</link>
		<dc:creator>LA Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5376</guid>
		<description>So what if it is a zombie. The stock price doesn&#039;t seem to be affected so much. Everybody is all of a sudden high on BAC. So, what&#039;s up with that? Martin, are you scooping up sharers of BAC as you talk it down...hmmmmm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if it is a zombie. The stock price doesn't seem to be affected so much. Everybody is all of a sudden high on BAC. So, what's up with that? Martin, are you scooping up sharers of BAC as you talk it down&#8230;hmmmmm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaiusgracchus</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>gaiusgracchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>It is true.  BofA is just a zombie.  They claim there is no consumer demand for loans, but this is a lie.   They are looking for any excuse not to lend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true.  BofA is just a zombie.  They claim there is no consumer demand for loans, but this is a lie.   They are looking for any excuse not to lend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Germany: Emerging Market Profit Potential, With (Only) Developed Market Risk</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5373</link>
		<dc:creator>Germany: Emerging Market Profit Potential, With (Only) Developed Market Risk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5373</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning Special Investing Research Report:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning Special Investing Research Report:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S&#38;P Makes Good On Most of Bank Downgrade Promise</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5371</link>
		<dc:creator>S&#38;P Makes Good On Most of Bank Downgrade Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5371</guid>
		<description>[...] Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson in February ranked BB&amp;T and U.S. Bancorp as two of his &#8220;hidden gems&#8221; among the top 12 banks in the U.S. &#8220;BB&amp;T is better capitalized and has continued to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson in February ranked BB&#38;T and U.S. Bancorp as two of his "hidden gems" among the top 12 banks in the U.S. "BB&#38;T is better capitalized and has continued to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What TARP Banks Are Investment Grade?</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5372</link>
		<dc:creator>What TARP Banks Are Investment Grade?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5372</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning Special Investing Research Report:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning Special Investing Research Report:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fifth Third - A Medium-Sized "Zombie" Bank</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5370</link>
		<dc:creator>Fifth Third - A Medium-Sized "Zombie" Bank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5370</guid>
		<description>[...] been stripped of nearly $1 billion by the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Kosovo War. If you missed the original &#8220;Top 12 U.S. banks&#8221; report &#8211; the story that was the precursor to this analysis of Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been stripped of nearly $1 billion by the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Kosovo War. If you missed the original &ldquo;Top 12 U.S. banks&rdquo; report &ndash; the story that was the precursor to this analysis of Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) &ndash; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Morning’s Bank Stress Test Says These Three Banks Are the Strongest</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5369</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning’s Bank Stress Test Says These Three Banks Are the Strongest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5369</guid>
		<description>[...] in February, I looked at the Top 12 U.S. banks, to determine whether it was really necessary - as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in February, I looked at the Top 12 U.S. banks, to determine whether it was really necessary &#8211; as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Look at Liquidity: The Real Reason Banks Aren’t Lending</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5368</link>
		<dc:creator>A Look at Liquidity: The Real Reason Banks Aren’t Lending</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5368</guid>
		<description>[...] That could include Bank of America Corp. (BAC), a bank that many experts say probably should have been liquidated long ago. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That could include Bank of America Corp. (BAC), a bank that many experts say probably should have been liquidated long ago. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Bank Real Profits by Bucking Wall Street's Latest Fashion Trends</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5364</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Bank Real Profits by Bucking Wall Street's Latest Fashion Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5364</guid>
		<description>[...] But at the other end of the spectrum investment in banks such as U.S. Bancorp (USB) or BB&amp;T Corp. (BBT) made a lot of sense. I said as much in my late February review of the top 12 U.S. banks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But at the other end of the spectrum investment in banks such as U.S. Bancorp (USB) or BB&amp;T Corp. (BBT) made a lot of sense. I said as much in my late February review of the top 12 U.S. banks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punitive Tax Rates of 90% Could Cause More Problems Than They Cure</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5366</link>
		<dc:creator>Punitive Tax Rates of 90% Could Cause More Problems Than They Cure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5366</guid>
		<description>[...] The article was one Money Morning&#039;s most popular pieces of the New Year [If you missed the story, please click here to check it out. The report is free of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The article was one Money Morning's most popular pieces of the New Year [If you missed the story, please click here to check it out. The report is free of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is This the Beginning of a Bull Market, or Just a Breather for the Bear?</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>Is This the Beginning of a Bull Market, or Just a Breather for the Bear?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>[...] banking system is not about to expire - a development I wrote about in an article entitled &#8220;The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems&#8221; in late [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] banking system is not about to expire &#8211; a development I wrote about in an article entitled "The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems" in late [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Banks: Why Only the Simplest Will Succeed</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5367</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Banks: Why Only the Simplest Will Succeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5367</guid>
		<description>[...] my February report on the top 12 U.S. banks, I showed how many of the top banks were in pretty good shape and offered investors good value, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my February report on the top 12 U.S. banks, I showed how many of the top banks were in pretty good shape and offered investors good value, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investing in Japan: Lots of Potential, Little Growth</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5363</link>
		<dc:creator>Investing in Japan: Lots of Potential, Little Growth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5363</guid>
		<description>[...] The article was one Money Morning&#039;s most popular pieces of the New Year [If you missed the story, please click here to check it out. The report is free of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The article was one Money Morning's most popular pieces of the New Year [If you missed the story, please click here to check it out. The report is free of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As Resurgent U.S. Banks Shift Into Profit Mode, Hitch a Ride With These Two for Gangbuster Returns</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5362</link>
		<dc:creator>As Resurgent U.S. Banks Shift Into Profit Mode, Hitch a Ride With These Two for Gangbuster Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5362</guid>
		<description>[...] the Top 12 U.S. banks I surveyed in a special Money Morning story a few weeks ago [actually 13, if you include a separate report I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Top 12 U.S. banks I surveyed in a special Money Morning story a few weeks ago [actually 13, if you include a separate report I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When the Going Gets Tough, Bank on Canada's Banks</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5361</link>
		<dc:creator>When the Going Gets Tough, Bank on Canada's Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5361</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning:  The Top 12 U.S. Banks: From Zombies to Hidden Gems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When it Comes to Naming Wall Street’s Worst Invention Ever, Credit Default Swaps Continue to Fill the Bill</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5360</link>
		<dc:creator>When it Comes to Naming Wall Street’s Worst Invention Ever, Credit Default Swaps Continue to Fill the Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>[...] last month, Hutchinson published an analysis on the &quot;Top 12 U.S. banks&quot; report. If you missed story, which enjoyed a big response when it was published last Wednesday, please [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last month, Hutchinson published an analysis on the "Top 12 U.S. banks" report. If you missed story, which enjoyed a big response when it was published last Wednesday, please [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke Sands</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5359</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke Sands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5359</guid>
		<description>If US Bank Corp goes below $10/share, like it did a week ago, I suggest you take every dime you got, and go long on it!  You&#039;ll have a 4-timer on your hands in less than 2 years! This company is the best of the banking industry, and pays a great dividend in the meantime (where can you get 15% returns while &#039;hanging out&#039; nowadays?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If US Bank Corp goes below $10/share, like it did a week ago, I suggest you take every dime you got, and go long on it!  You'll have a 4-timer on your hands in less than 2 years! This company is the best of the banking industry, and pays a great dividend in the meantime (where can you get 15% returns while 'hanging out' nowadays?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Reasons Bank Nationalization Will Keep Investors Awake at Night</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/02/18/us-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-5356</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Reasons Bank Nationalization Will Keep Investors Awake at Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4952#comment-5356</guid>
		<description>[...] start by just talking about nationalization in general. If you&#8217;re a shareholder in one of the banks I christened &#8220;zombies&#8221; last week, then you&#8217;ve probably already lost 90% of your investment. You&#8217;re also not getting any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] start by just talking about nationalization in general. If you&rsquo;re a shareholder in one of the banks I christened &ldquo;zombies&rdquo; last week, then you&rsquo;ve probably already lost 90% of your investment. You&rsquo;re also not getting any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

