By Peter Schiff
Guest Columnist
Money Morning
With millions of homeowners now struggling to repay money that they clearly never should have borrowed, our leaders have been righteously wagging fingers at predatory lenders who allegedly enticed innocent borrowers, and the country, into a financial snake pit.
While the mortgage industry clearly deserves a good share of the blame, unindicted co-conspirators abound. The ringleaders are still at-large and are, in fact, busy hatching a plan that would dwarf their earlier mistakes.
Contrary to the message bouncing off the marble walls of the Capitol building, most borrowers in the inflating housing bubble clearly understood the terms of their loans. Most knew that they could not afford their mortgage payments once their teaser rates expired, but enthusiastically jumped into the debt pool anyway, believing that guaranteed real estate appreciation, or a quick and profitable sale, would keep them afloat, or bail them out.
Although both lenders and borrowers were acting in their own perceived self-interest, what can we say of our economic policymakers who are expected to protect the good of all? Their actions encouraged the whole sad circus. Were it not for the excessively low interest rates provided by the U.S. Federal Reserve, the lax lending standards and moral hazards supplied by Congress courtesy of Freddie Mac (FRE), Fannie Mae (FNM), and the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the many real estate subsidies built into the tax code, none of these predatory loans would have been possible.
Had lenders exercised better judgment, and had borrowers avoided overly burdensome debt loads, both parties would clearly be in better financial positions today. Instead, as borrowers were demanding the credit to fuel their dreams of instant real estate riches, lenders were being ordered to accommodate them.
In past generations, homebuyers were required to save for down payments and postpone their purchases until they could actually afford conventional 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages. But in recent years, as homeownership became a matter of public policy, the government accused lenders of discrimination and urged lower standards and easier terms. With government guarantees in place, the mortgage industry was happy to both expand its revenue and promote a better society.
But by denying credit, even if doing so requires borrowers to forgo something they clearly want, lenders not only provide a valuable service to borrowers, but to society. Given the mess in which we now find ourselves, due to the bad loans made during the real estate bubble, this lesson should have been well learned.
Unfortunately, it wasn't. And now the same dynamic is now playing out on a much larger scale.
Faced with a prospect of downgrading the American lifestyle, the U.S. government is instead borrowing trillions of dollars to artificially inflate our deflating bubble economy. The money is being used to both expand the size of government and to finance additional consumer spending. Given our financial position, this is the exact opposite of what we should be doing.
Our global creditors are now making the same mistakes made by subprime mortgage lenders. They are loaning us money that we will never be able to repay. In the process, they are enabling the largest expansion in the size of our government since the New Deal and crippling an economy already suffering from excess consumption.
Although it may sound harsh, it would be far better for everyone involved if our foreign friends simply cut us off. Since their loans are merely fueling the growth of our government and artificially pumping up consumer spending, their savings will not only be lost but their sacrifice will severely exacerbate our problems.
Just as homebuyers did earlier in this decade, the U.S. government will borrow as much money as the world is foolish enough to lend, and it will use those funds to smother the life out of our economy. At this point, government is growing like a cancer, feeding mainly off the funds it borrows from abroad. In the process, it is placing a horrific debt burden on its people, committing them to either a lifetime of crippling interest payments or run-away inflation.
There is nothing inherently wrong with foreign lending. If funding were directed toward private business to enable capital investments, the loans would not only benefit lenders, they would benefit our nation as well. The funds would fortify our industrial base and provide the necessary foundation upon which to rebuild a viable economy.
If foreign lenders were to cut us off, there would be some immediate pain, but tough love is exactly what we need right now. Forcing Americans to live within their means, particularly the U.S. government, will be just as beneficial to the long-term health of our economy as similar restraint would have been had it been exercised by mortgage lenders.
It's too bad so few of us seem capable of making this connection, or learning anything from the mistakes of the past – even when the ink in the history books has yet to dry.
[Editor's Note: Peter D. Schiff, Euro Pacific Capital Inc.'s president and chief global strategist, is a well-known author and commentator, and is a periodic contributor to Money Morning. Schiff is the author of two New York Times best sellers: "The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets," and "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." For a more-detailed analysis of the nation's financial problems, and the inherent dangers that these problems pose for both the U.S. economy and for dollar-denominated investments, click here to download Euro Pacific's new financial-research report, "The Collapsing Dollar: The Powerful Case for Investing in Foreign Securities."
In the midst of an ongoing financial crisis that's eradicated trillions of dollars in shareholder wealth, the profit search facing U.S. investors is tougher than ever. The uncertainty surrounding the economic-stimulus and banking-bailout plans isn't helping. But a new Money Morning report is a two-way win for investors: It addresses the bear-market threats these plans pose, and also spotlights some of the hard-to-find but potentially lucrative profit plays that remain. The report is free of charge, and also details ways that readers can obtain a copy of the best seller, "Crash Proof," in which Schiff details the causes of the housing bubble and financial-system collapse, and tells investors how to dodge losses from the problems that are still to come. To read our free report, and to find out more about this offer, please click here.]
News and Related Story Links:
- Money Morning Profiting From the Aftershocks Series:
The New Banking Bailout Plan Reconstitutes Some of the Same Ingredients That Touched Off the Financial Crisis.
- Wikipedia:
New Deal.
Tags: Peter D. Schiff, Subprime






Right on, right on, right on! At least 95% of the borrowers that are now not paying their mortgage knew what they were getting into, although 95% of them now blame the loan officer or lender. Every single one of them bitching now about being misled is NOT also saying that they didn't want to buy the house they're in. In fact, they now say that they can't afford the payment, but, they don't want to give up the house they can't afford. The government should step out of the way and let the free market cleanse itself of all the excesses!!!!!!!
While I agree that there are many people out there with defaulting loans they should not have taken, I am one of those who were a responsible borrower that now faces the loss of my home because I am in the process of being laid off. I always had good intentions and put money into my home thinking that some day, I could sell it and use that for retirement. Now, I face disaster because of socialist ideology thinking Chris Dodd, Barnie Frank and others in Congress who conspired with Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac to force lenders to make 12% to 28% of their mortgage loans to the bottom 1/6 of wage earners! The middle class is being displaced by the new order of government dependant trolls.
Fact of the matter is, opportunists prevail.
The 'benefit racket' is already too intertwined for these foreign creditors to revert to an honorable game — if they let the US go down, they will be dragged along one way or another (such as their own sets of domestic problems billowing out of control).
…Way too painful for the genetically myopic 'politician species' to even dare dream of. (They're already too busy angling for the most favorable loan terms, anyway!)
It wont matter, the govt will simply print more money.
"Unfortunately" the largest lender China has no choice in the issue as it has to defend its dollar peg or face the prospect of a dramatic increase in the Renminbi which would kill its export market and so they will still continue buying U.S. paper for some time to come; at least until the Renminbi becomes a freely-floating currency which I don't foresee in the near future. Perhaps even during our lifetimes!
of course if the government's plan works then Schiff's recommendations as well as his business interests won't benefit from the crash that his investments require. the point of the government plan is to make the crisis less severe and to allow a more gradual shift, than to instantly put us in a deep depression that would have untold fallout.
There is a series of assumptions at the foundation of the position taken in the article By Peter Schiff, which are taken as incontrovertible biblical truth, and therefore never questioned.
Starting with the title of the article: When the entire world of financial communities look to government for bailouts, seemingly acknowledging it as the source of money, the article takes it for granted that the government has to get the money from some other, higher power, not named; surely he doesn't mean the financial community!
For a wealthy country such as the US, there are enough resources and productivity to make it possible for all to have secure housing over which they have mastery. Yet, the financial system makes it impossible but for a small percentage of the population to own homes. And when the wealth is created by the population's productive capacity, one has to wonder why government or the financial community has failed to distribute a reasonable share of that wealth to the population, 80% of which is owned or controlled instead by the top 2-5%.
The article assumes hoards of irresponsible buyers abound in our midst.
The "irresponsible" buyer, who is trying to take the ring that he knows is his earned right, and the only way left to get it, is by attempting the same shenanigans used by the financial community, so he takes a calculated risk. But as all pyramid schemes only benefit the top 25% at the expense of the bottom 75%, its no wonder that the system collapsed. The money hasn't totally disappeared; much of it is in the pockets of that top layer who benefited from the euphoria of the upswing.
Taking such risks on buying a home is a subconscious act of social revolt. While the result may have appeared unexpected, losing one home under the set of circumstances of our recent times, has become the ironic unexpected retribution to expose bare the inequities of the system.
In the past generations the labor of a man could support a family and their children, and almost everyone could buy a home. Why hasn't it been possible in our time for a family with 2 or more working adults to buy a home? We certainly didn't get lazier; we added our family resources, and with added hours of work, sometimes holding more than one job, and still can't make ends meet.
Stop blaming the people, and talk of the government as if it were an entity separate from the people. We the people are the government, and will continue to press into service those who have the people's interest at heart, and hopefully they've not sold their souls to mammon.
Are opposing points of view permitted here?
Consumers look at banks as pillars in the community, just as they view doctors; If that pillar says a solution is sanctioned they tend to go with it without thinking or taking Responsibility – similarly they vote for one of two parties without thinking that they are both the same. The banks were making a dream come true. I agree that the sooner the foreign central banks cut us off and the sooner the dollar crashes and the sooner the banks fail the better we will be. But unfortunately the powers that be will maintain the "recovery is just around the corner if we spend more money" ponzie game as long as possible. Folk need to again take Responsibility, and help the process by selling all forms of investments ASAP.
I've been reading these "MM" reports for the last two weeks, trying to execute a consience decision as to whether the information contained within, is actually worth singning on. That internal debate remains within me.
However, some responses deserve special attention such as the interjection by Nick Polimeni. I see another "Guest Columnist" in the making!!!! Great reponse!!!
Since many stocks are sprialing downward out of control, depreciating basically, I would like to reccomend simply liquidating (401's too), & putting that $ on principal only of a personal residence or other property & getting a smaller monthly payment, after modifying if you are doing that. The savings in interest will be compounded to you, it will help the banks as well, you may even save enough to be able to spend more & stimulate the economy & if & the peace of mind having a smaller payment or paying off the property in this volitile market will be priceless.
Then after you have caught your breath & taken a vacation from all the stock chaos, you can study to see where it is good to reinvest with our "new" market eventually.
That of course means you still need to study stocks & have this good company to help.
Just as homebuyers did earlier in this decade, the U.S. government will borrow as much money as the world is foolish enough to lend… it is placing a horrific debt burden on its people, committing them to either a lifetime of crippling interest payments or run-away inflation.
So, a form of predatory borrowing that's been well known in the global south.