<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citigroup Stock Drama: Capitalist Conspiracy or Pursuit of Profits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Newest Ruse: Banks Capitalizing on “Toxic Assets” to Book Puffed-Up Profits</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6279</link>
		<dc:creator>The Newest Ruse: Banks Capitalizing on “Toxic Assets” to Book Puffed-Up Profits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=6989#comment-6279</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember the infamous leaked Vikram S. Pandit memo we wrote to you about awhile back that suddenly saw Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) turn a profit on nothing more than vapors? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember the infamous leaked Vikram S. Pandit memo we wrote to you about awhile back that suddenly saw Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) turn a profit on nothing more than vapors? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX-XX-XXXX</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX-XX-XXXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=6989#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>Whatever happend result is known - regular people/taxpayers/stockholders will loose money. Start thinking from this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happend result is known &#8211; regular people/taxpayers/stockholders will loose money. Start thinking from this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6275</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=6989#comment-6275</guid>
		<description>So still not really clear about what you think is going to happen to the citi common share value in the coming days? Will the big money sell the newly converted stock straight away or hold? What do you think will happen to the common stock price? Thank you  for any clarity/opinion you can provide</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So still not really clear about what you think is going to happen to the citi common share value in the coming days? Will the big money sell the newly converted stock straight away or hold? What do you think will happen to the common stock price? Thank you  for any clarity/opinion you can provide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logic</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6276</link>
		<dc:creator>Logic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=6989#comment-6276</guid>
		<description>A simpler explanation is that the numbers are so obviously cooked that they&#039;ve burnt any gullibility most sheeple had left?

Then there&#039;s the old adage &quot;buy the rumor, sell the news&quot;.

Lastly the massive suckers&#039; rally so far during an ongoing bear market and nascent depression that promises to get much worse.

Simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simpler explanation is that the numbers are so obviously cooked that they've burnt any gullibility most sheeple had left?</p>
<p>Then there's the old adage "buy the rumor, sell the news".</p>
<p>Lastly the massive suckers' rally so far during an ongoing bear market and nascent depression that promises to get much worse.</p>
<p>Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/04/21/citigroup-stock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=6989#comment-6277</guid>
		<description>Nice update. The government may be throwing good money after bad with Citi. t is also unclear as to the additional benefits taxpayers would receive by converting the preferreds. It may be more prudent to (i) keep the preferred shares, and (ii) lower the coupon payment (assuming this is &quot;the financial burden&quot; referred to in the article). In exchange for a lower coupon rate, why not request a lower strike price to convert the preferreds? In legal parlance, this is known as &quot;quid pro quo&quot; or &quot;this for that&quot;. Under a bankruptcy scenario, taxpayers would then have a higher claim on Citi&#039;s assets than common shareholders. If a group of inner city kids can figure it out then I know adults can. To learn more go to http://www.newyorkshockexchange.com/content/view/78/37/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice update. The government may be throwing good money after bad with Citi. t is also unclear as to the additional benefits taxpayers would receive by converting the preferreds. It may be more prudent to (i) keep the preferred shares, and (ii) lower the coupon payment (assuming this is "the financial burden" referred to in the article). In exchange for a lower coupon rate, why not request a lower strike price to convert the preferreds? In legal parlance, this is known as "quid pro quo" or "this for that". Under a bankruptcy scenario, taxpayers would then have a higher claim on Citi's assets than common shareholders. If a group of inner city kids can figure it out then I know adults can. To learn more go to http://www.newyorkshockexchange.com/content/view/78/37/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

