<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History Will Show That Alan Greenspan Played a Key Role in Creating the U.S. Housing Bubble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>I was in the audience 10 years ago when Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald fabulously referred to Greenspan as a zero. He&#039;s been spot on for long before that cheeky fellow Schiff came on the scene. History will show that Greenspan did more to undermine the future credibility of the world&#039;s financial system than any single player during his time in office beginning in the mid 1990s when he refused to exercise the authority Congress explicitly gave him to crack down on the beginnings of the lending mess that has so spectacularly blown up in our faces today. And then again during the process leading up to the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 which removed reporting requirements for derivatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the audience 10 years ago when Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald fabulously referred to Greenspan as a zero. He's been spot on for long before that cheeky fellow Schiff came on the scene. History will show that Greenspan did more to undermine the future credibility of the world's financial system than any single player during his time in office beginning in the mid 1990s when he refused to exercise the authority Congress explicitly gave him to crack down on the beginnings of the lending mess that has so spectacularly blown up in our faces today. And then again during the process leading up to the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 which removed reporting requirements for derivatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Gilgen</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gilgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Bubbles Greenspan and Ole Pres Clinton were the culprits...read this article from Sept. 30, 1999 when Clinton was president....

Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending
By STEVEN A. HOLMES
Published: Thursday, September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation&#039;s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

&#039;&#039;Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990&#039;s by reducing down payment requirements,&#039;&#039; said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae&#039;s chairman and chief executive officer. &#039;&#039;Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.&#039;&#039;

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980&#039;s.

&#039;&#039;From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,&#039;&#039; said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. &#039;&#039;If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.&#039;&#039;

Under Fannie Mae&#039;s pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation&#039;s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990&#039;s. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University&#039;s Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae&#039;s and Freddie Mac&#039;s portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bubbles Greenspan and Ole Pres Clinton were the culprits&#8230;read this article from Sept. 30, 1999 when Clinton was president&#8230;.</p>
<p>Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending<br />
By STEVEN A. HOLMES<br />
Published: Thursday, September 30, 1999</p>
<p>In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.</p>
<p>The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets &#8212; including the New York metropolitan region &#8212; will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.</p>
<p>Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.</p>
<p>In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates &#8212; anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.</p>
<p>"Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements," said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. "Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market."</p>
<p>Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.</p>
<p>In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.</p>
<p>"From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us," said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. "If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry."</p>
<p>Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 &#8212; a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.</p>
<p>Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.</p>
<p>Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.</p>
<p>Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.</p>
<p>In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.</p>
<p>Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.</p>
<p>In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.</p>
<p>The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Comesana</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6599</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Comesana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6599</guid>
		<description>Mr Greenspan overviewed the merge between two bankrupted financial institutions, Morgan and Chase that were exposed at the time for more than 13.5 trillion dollars in derivatives out of total market of 21,0 trillions! Innocent move...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Greenspan overviewed the merge between two bankrupted financial institutions, Morgan and Chase that were exposed at the time for more than 13.5 trillion dollars in derivatives out of total market of 21,0 trillions! Innocent move&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6598</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6598</guid>
		<description>My hypothesis is that the Federal Reserve policy for the past thirty years was created as the result of a bet between Alan Greenspan and L. Ron Hubbard. http://is.gd/Bm3c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hypothesis is that the Federal Reserve policy for the past thirty years was created as the result of a bet between Alan Greenspan and L. Ron Hubbard. http://is.gd/Bm3c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Treutler</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6600</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Treutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6600</guid>
		<description>Anyone of his stature who cannot speak clearly is either a fool or in the pay of unsavory forces. The corporate owned media always made fawning comments at his incomprehensibility as if words less soiled by the common herd somehow elevated the speaker. I referred to him as Greenspook as did some of my friends. We were a minute constituency on Wall Street where people nearly drooled at the mention of his name. Time cometh to us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone of his stature who cannot speak clearly is either a fool or in the pay of unsavory forces. The corporate owned media always made fawning comments at his incomprehensibility as if words less soiled by the common herd somehow elevated the speaker. I referred to him as Greenspook as did some of my friends. We were a minute constituency on Wall Street where people nearly drooled at the mention of his name. Time cometh to us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turton</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6601</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6601</guid>
		<description>TAX FREE SALE OF YOUR PERSONAL RESIDENCE:
  Why is it that no one ever writes about or talks about our legislators.  In the 90&#039;s a tax law change went into effect that I feel had as big an effect as any of this interest rate talk.  As an accountant I remember when you could only exclude the gain from the sale of your personal residence once and only if you were over 55 years of age.  When the law changed to any age and it could be done every 2 years the price of housing immediately started going crazy.  This law change was a direct handout to the building industry which has made big winners and big losers.  One more example of tax policy for political payback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAX FREE SALE OF YOUR PERSONAL RESIDENCE:<br />
  Why is it that no one ever writes about or talks about our legislators.  In the 90's a tax law change went into effect that I feel had as big an effect as any of this interest rate talk.  As an accountant I remember when you could only exclude the gain from the sale of your personal residence once and only if you were over 55 years of age.  When the law changed to any age and it could be done every 2 years the price of housing immediately started going crazy.  This law change was a direct handout to the building industry which has made big winners and big losers.  One more example of tax policy for political payback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Yancis</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/greenspan-housing-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Yancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7405#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>Comrade Greenspan is very much the problem.  He jacked up rates at first for the wrong reason.  He wanted to put the brakes on the hot stock market and crashed the economy.  It seems to me if he wanted to let the air out of the market he could have changed margin requirements and accomplished his goal.  People think Mr. Greenspan is so smart that they can&#039;t interpret what he is saying.  More to the point, he is a babbling senile old fool that no one should pay any attention to what he has to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade Greenspan is very much the problem.  He jacked up rates at first for the wrong reason.  He wanted to put the brakes on the hot stock market and crashed the economy.  It seems to me if he wanted to let the air out of the market he could have changed margin requirements and accomplished his goal.  People think Mr. Greenspan is so smart that they can't interpret what he is saying.  More to the point, he is a babbling senile old fool that no one should pay any attention to what he has to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

