<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As Key Global Markets Stumble, Gold and Dividend Stocks May Keep Investors on Course</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/25/global-markets-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/25/global-markets-3/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Mailsby</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/05/25/global-markets-3/comment-page-1/#comment-53506</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Mailsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7485#comment-53506</guid>
		<description>how many times are you going to publish this data wihout including the other side,ie. the results of missisg the 1o worst daye, 30 worst days, etc, 

•Stayed the course: 10.5%.
 •Missed the 10 best days: 7.1%.
 •Missed the 30 best days: 2.2%.
 •Missed the best 60 days: (-3.2%).
 •Missed the best 90 days: (-7.4%).
I have been reading this one sided argument most of my life( I am 71). the data is misleading when you dont include it all. The complete information is readily available, Makes your discussion sound like a hyped up inacurate sales pitch, Gil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many times are you going to publish this data wihout including the other side,ie. the results of missisg the 1o worst daye, 30 worst days, etc, </p>
<p>•Stayed the course: 10.5%.<br />
 •Missed the 10 best days: 7.1%.<br />
 •Missed the 30 best days: 2.2%.<br />
 •Missed the best 60 days: (-3.2%).<br />
 •Missed the best 90 days: (-7.4%).<br />
I have been reading this one sided argument most of my life( I am 71). the data is misleading when you dont include it all. The complete information is readily available, Makes your discussion sound like a hyped up inacurate sales pitch, Gil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

