<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By Putting Real Teeth into its Intellectual-Property-Rights Rules, China Moves a Step Closer to Superpower Status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has Asia Dethroned Detroit as the Auto Sector Leader?</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>Has Asia Dethroned Detroit as the Auto Sector Leader?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>[...] course, Geely can only do this because of China’s slowly improving, but-still-problematic disregard for intellectual property laws. However, in a world where China is the largest automobile market, it may well be that Geely’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, Geely can only do this because of China’s slowly improving, but-still-problematic disregard for intellectual property laws. However, in a world where China is the largest automobile market, it may well be that Geely’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Wardell</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Wardell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>I do not care if China infringes on patents in the world market. Our government should protect US patents in the US market. It is what I call the faddy item law.

If moneymorning wants information about the faddy item law, they have my e-mail address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not care if China infringes on patents in the world market. Our government should protect US patents in the US market. It is what I call the faddy item law.</p>
<p>If moneymorning wants information about the faddy item law, they have my e-mail address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Gilmore</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-6747</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Gilmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-6747</guid>
		<description>Looks like China was successful.  We are biting off on the story that China is putting a stop to copyright and patent infringement with a measley $3MM court settlement.  We have a long way to go.  And Ruth Bishop, how about some examples?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like China was successful.  We are biting off on the story that China is putting a stop to copyright and patent infringement with a measley $3MM court settlement.  We have a long way to go.  And Ruth Bishop, how about some examples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Bishop</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-6744</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-6744</guid>
		<description>Maybe...but to think the US doesn&#039;t do the same thing is naive. Look at our history...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe&#8230;but to think the US doesn't do the same thing is naive. Look at our history&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hahin</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-6746</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hahin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-6746</guid>
		<description>This article is wishful thinking on the part of the author.  The Chinese, as in many authoritative countries that want to maximize their advancement, use intellectual property theft and copyright infringement as cheap &quot;leapfrogging&quot; rather than expend their own resources on internal R&amp;D.  This applies to both commercial products and military hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is wishful thinking on the part of the author.  The Chinese, as in many authoritative countries that want to maximize their advancement, use intellectual property theft and copyright infringement as cheap "leapfrogging" rather than expend their own resources on internal R&amp;D.  This applies to both commercial products and military hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searcher</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-6745</link>
		<dc:creator>Searcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-6745</guid>
		<description>Unpersuasive apologia for ludicrously cosmetic eyewash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unpersuasive apologia for ludicrously cosmetic eyewash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCB Gupta</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/06/04/china-intellectual-property-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-6743</link>
		<dc:creator>KCB Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7602#comment-6743</guid>
		<description>It looks like an odd case. We can not believe that China is sincere in protecting the Intellectual Property Rights. China is abound with such IPR infringements and its growth was partly due to infringements and breaking many international rules.  Whole world was watching as it did not know how to deal with an iron curtain country sealed tightly with some ambiquous laws and difficult language barriers. We have to see this case is a fluke and such judgements will follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an odd case. We can not believe that China is sincere in protecting the Intellectual Property Rights. China is abound with such IPR infringements and its growth was partly due to infringements and breaking many international rules.  Whole world was watching as it did not know how to deal with an iron curtain country sealed tightly with some ambiquous laws and difficult language barriers. We have to see this case is a fluke and such judgements will follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

