The Five Factors That Could Save "Government Motors"

[Editor's Note: This is the first of two parts. Next up: How China Could Save GM.]

By William Patalon III
And Jason Simpkins
Money Morning Editors

Critics have wailed about the years of mismanagement, which has created the company's present plight. And they've howled about a government bailout, which they see as nothing but good money following bad. 

But when the company these critics sarcastically refer to as "Government Motors" – General Motors Corp. (OTC: GMGMQ) – emerges from bankruptcy as expected early next year, it could be leaner, meaner and perfectly positioned for the smaller, highly competitive and truly global auto-making market that has been one of the major outgrowths of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

General Motors "is going to light it back up before long," says Gary Dilts, a DaimlerChrysler veteran who now serves as a senior vice president for global automotive analysis at J.D. Power & Associates, the marketing information heavyweight. "They're going to be in a good position once they're out of bankruptcy. GM has a pretty good product plan, and they're leaving 10 years of debt on the side of the road."

That's somewhat of a contrarian viewpoint. But five factors favor a GM turnaround:

  • Bankruptcy will transform GM from a bloated company with too many products and too many dealers into an organization whose smaller size is better suited to the permanently crisis-diminished U.S. auto market.
  • The bankruptcy process will also allow the company to turn billions in liabilities into equity, taking cash that would otherwise have been used for debt service – or to finance healthcare or retiree benefits – and making it available for investments in new products, new auto technologies, new marketing initiatives, as well as for global expansion.
  • GM has a stronger stable of products than most observers realize.
  • The consumer backlash against the bankruptcy likely won't be as damaging as had been initially feared. In fact, as rival U.S. carmaker Chrysler LLC already discovered in its own bankruptcy, potential defections and severed relationships can be avoided with aggressive discounts and strong marketing efforts.
  • And, in what many U.S. consumers may be surprised to find is a key to GM's overall long-term success, General Motors has established an incredibly strong position in China – a strength that will let it capitalize on the world's fastest-growing (and eventually, largest) overall market and that will enable it to utilize that low-cost market to produce vehicles and ship them back into the United States, in order to sell them at competitive prices.

The decline of the U.S. auto industry has been a drawn-out and difficult affair, inflicting pain on current workers, retirees, suppliers, and many others throughout the global economy. In some cases – such as with the many family owned and small-community GM and Chrysler dealerships that will be shuttered as part of the bankruptcy-induced streamlining and restructuring – that pain will only increase in the near term.

The long-term goal, of course, is to create an automaker that can sustain itself, meet its existing commitments and eventually even grow – as opposed to merely surviving. Without the bankruptcy and reorganization, in fact, GM wasn't even going to hold its own, one economist says.

"I think everyone needs to keep in mind that if this company fails, that's the worst case scenario," Michigan State University Economics Professor Charles Ballard told NBC affiliate WILX TV-10 in Lansing. "It would be really good for the people of Michigan and for Lansing for GM to become a viable company.

Right now, it's not."

Adjusting to the Auto Market's Long, Slow Decline

GM has struggled in recent years to compete, hurt by its truck and SUV-dominated vehicle line-up and a deep plunge in U.S. vehicle demand. The upshot: The No. 1 U.S.-based automaker – which once employed 500,000 people – has lost an aggregate $82 billion in the past four years even as it slashed production capacity, cut back on the number of nameplates it sold under and eradicated more than 100,000 U.S. jobs. It needs to cut another 19,000 workers by 2012 to bring its domestic employment down to 72,500 jobs. And some critics say even that won't be enough.

But here's one factor that should help: By downsizing, GM's leadership has admitted that the financial crisis has reduced the size and makeup of the market for new cars and trucks in the United States – probably permanently.

The U.S. Big Three of GM,Chrysler and Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) will have to adjust to this post-financial-crisis "new reality." Automakers will sell only 10 million cars and trucks in the U.S. market this year, the worst showing in at least three decades – and roughly 38% less than the 16 million vehicles that were sold in the United States annually in recent years before the financial collapse caused auto sales to nosedive.

Part of the reason for the slump in new vehicle sales is that consumers are increasingly turning to used cars. Pre-owned car sales are up 10% this year over last, as credit availability increases, but buyers focus on affordability. In fact, according to the most-recent report, used-car sales jumped in April, and that trend is expected to continue at least until the middle of the year as pent-up demand for affordable, pre-owned vehicles revs up the used-vehicle segment of the auto marketplace.

Goodbye GM, Hello "Government Motors"

Criticisms aside, GM actually has some highly alluring assets – some of which it's already agreed to sell. By taking GM through bankruptcy, company leaders and the Obama administration expect to slash debt, free up cash flow to invest in those assets, and actually put the behemoth back on the growth path.

With a reported $82.3 billion in assets and $172.8 billion in debt at the time of the June 1, filing, GM was the fourth-largest bankruptcy in U.S. history and the largest ever by an industrial company.

The U.S. government is supposed to bankroll the "new" GM with an additional $30 billion in financing. That brings the government's total investment to roughly $50 billion, which it will convert to a 60% stake in the new company. 

In a last minute change to the bankruptcy plan, Canada agreed to provide $9.5 billion in funding and would get a 12% stake. The United Auto Workers (UAW) union would have 17.5% share of the GM, and bondholders would get a 10% stake.

"The New GM will have a dramatically stronger balance sheet, with far less debt, which will allow us to better invest in our business and our future," new Chief Executive Officer Frederick A. "Fritz" Henderson said in an open letter to customers and shareholders. "It will have fully competitive labor costs and the ability to generate sustained and positive bottom-line performance. From Day One, the New GM will be well positioned to capitalize on the award-winning vehicles we have developed and launched in past years.

The plan calls for General Motors to become a publicly traded company in the first or second quarter of next year – at the earliest, GM Chief Financial Officer Ray G. Young said last week.

"In terms of the timing of that, '09 would be impossible because we're just starting up the new General Motors," Young told reporters last week. "There's going to be a lot of accounting issues that we're going to work through in order to get the books of new GM set up."

Young said he was unsure when the U.S. and Canadian governments would begin to sell their stakes, noting that both want "an orderly sell-down in order to both not hurt General Motors, the share price of General Motors and, frankly, also in order to maximize the value to the Canadian and U.S. taxpayers. So I think this is something that is going to be worked out into the future."

Once that is worked out, GM will officially no longer be "Government Motors."

Pedal to the Metal

Even as the company navigates the tricky rapids of corporate bankruptcy, Henderson, the new CEO, must develop a finely tuned operational plan, and start implementing it immediately.

Fortunately, Henderson – who took over after CEO G. Richard Wagoner Jr. was ousted in late March – has more to work with than most experts think.

The "new GM" will have a number of key vehicle launches in 2009, 2010 and 2011 – including the Chevrolet Camaro, Chevy Cruze, and "the revolutionary Chevy Volt, an extended-range electric vehicle that can travel up to 40 miles on battery power alone," GM said in a letter to customers and media interviews last week.

Though it's a reincarnation of the late-1960s muscle car, the new Camaro (along with the Dodge Challenger) is one of the most-talked-about new offerings on the market today. The styling was spot-on and it's fuel-efficient.

(It also doesn't hurt that the Camaro has a nice role as "Bumblebee," one of the characters in the soon-to-open movie, "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.")

GM's Chevrolet Malibu – a mid-sized that offers exceptional fuel mileage for its category – and the highly regarded Cadillac CTS are considered "world-class vehicles." GM needs to realize this and showcase such offerings, says Daniel Roos, an engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies the automobile industry.

"The quality of its cars was horrible in the '70s and '80s, but it's much better now," Roos told reporters. It has world-class vehicles [in] the Malibu and the Cadillac CTS. They should be [promoting] those and capitalizing on their strengths."

Taking a page from Chrysler, General Motors did move aggressively to reassure current GM vehicle owners that warranties would be honored. It will likely step up its marketing efforts and could offer incentives to GM vehicle owners who purchased models or brands that it is phasing out. GM has just launched a new ad campaign whose brutal frankness has sparked controversy about its potential effectiveness, Time magazine reported.

However, the point that even many of the media experts discussing the campaign are missing is that, well, everyone's discussing the campaign. And in an era in which there literally are millions of competing media messages, getting noticed is half the battle.

All told, all these efforts could keep GM's post-bankruptcy sales from plunging – and might even hold them somewhat steady. But to actually induce sales growth, the company will have to turn to its secret weapon.

And for GM, that secret is China.

[Editor's Note: Looking for the next hot stock? The next hot market? Look no further. A new offer from Money Morning is a double-barreled bonus for investors looking for profit plays that aren't already on every broker's "Buy" list. Noted financial commentator Peter D. Schiff's new book - "The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets" - shows investors how to profit no matter which way the market moves, while our monthly newsletter, The Money Map Report, provides an ongoing analysis of the global financial markets, as well as some of the best profit plays you'll find anywhere - including investments from such markets as Taiwan and China. To find out how to get both the book and the newsletter, check out our newest offer.]

News and Related Story Links:

 

More on this topic (What's this?)
Bankrupt GM Dumps the Hummer
Taking Bets on Hummer’s Buyer
Why Shouldn't GM Be Allowed to Lobby?
Why GM's Financial Projections Are Invalid
Read more on General Motors at Wikinvest

Tags: ,

17 Responses

  1. Keith R. Enste | June 11, 2009

    Ultimately, when all is said and done, the American Automobile Industry feel victim to the greed, arrogance, and inertia of those corporate goons who put their own needs ahead of the public which they supposedly served. By providing only large fuel inefficient, poorly designed, poorly manufactured products; they flung the doors wide open for their foreign competition who were more than happy to provide smaller, lighter, fuel efficient products. The other aspect of foreign manufacturers that their American corporate counterparts could have taken a lesson from; was the fact that rather than offer thirty or forty different poorly engineered products; they chose instead to concentrate on two or three well designed, well engineered, well thought-out products. Had American auto manufacturers been paying attention they might have “seen the light” and adopted this manufacturing model. Unfortunately, those who don’t learn from their past mistakes are, unfortunately,destined to repeat them: which this industry via inept, corrupt corporate goons now must certainly realize. Unfortunately, these leaders of this once great American industry realized only too late that their priorities were in the wrong place all along: Now the entire industry will pay a very heavy price. Unfortunately, so too will all Americans; perhaps the entire world. The coming recession; err, make that depression will be far worse than the one that paralyzed this nation and the world back in the thirties.

    The looming economic apocalypse will be worse than any ever seen.

    Reply
  2. bruce smith | June 11, 2009

    I've surveyed many of my friends and every single one said they will not ever buy a GM car again.

    Reply
  3. David Factor | June 11, 2009

    Having reviewed the article "the Five Factors that could save Government Motors", as an ex contractor for GM I believe there are two factors that need to be faced before the "new GM" can emerge.

    1. The current Management Team save for Rick W have been in place holding the same jobs for most of the last two years, and longer in some cases. It is their loyalty to a dictatorial management style and a broken business model that are essentially responsible for the plight they find their company in. It beggers belief, that given the magnitude of the failure that has occurred that more senior staff were not shown the door. I remember just after the first visit to Washington (the one on the private jet), one senior executive expressed the view that those in Washington did not understand that it was purely the drop in demand which was solely responsible for the company's ills.

    2. The current business model is broken. In recent years it is interesting to note that the vast numbers of delears, not only in the US but in the developed economies generally, were surviving not on the "profitable" margins of new and used car sales, but rather on the fees and commissions from financing and the bloated charges for servicing. It begs the question of how a business model, which has seen GM and its dealers make little or no money from the sale of its primary products for quite some time, can still make sense.

    I find it interesting that the authors of the article outline their factors of success in terms of the automotive world that was and not in terms of an industry in the US in need of a radical and total overhaul.

    Reply
  4. Henry Johnson | June 11, 2009

    I will never buy GM again. I have owned GM pick-ups since 1967. I don't have any problem with the product as every one of them served me well. I was also a GM bondholder and feel raped by Obama and the unions. I will not support a company or president that tears up 200 years of contract law to further their own agenda.

    Reply
  5. Uncle J | June 11, 2009

    As a laid-off 17-year veteran of Detroit, I've seen first hand how the UAW had a big hand in the demise of these companies. I and all my family will never, EVER, buy a Government Motors or Fiat/Chrysler vehicle.

    Reply
  6. Johnathan Vrozos | June 11, 2009

    Cosmo Mannella and Joe Mancinelli of LIUNA are very supportive of keeping GM alive and well.

    Saving and keeping the jobs is of paramount importance in GM surviving the days and years ahead.

    "It's very simple, only people with good paying jobs can afford to buy new cars" said Joe Mancinelli.

    "Employment equals new car purchases" said Cosmo Mannella.

    Save the jobs and create new jobs people.

    By Johnathan Vrozos
    http://www.johnathanvrozos.com
    http://www.johnathanvrozos.ca

    Reply
  7. Heather | June 12, 2009

    It seems to me that their cars will still cost to much for many to buy. I do not see anything they have done that will lower the price.

    I will still drive a Hyandia.

    Reply
  8. Randy | June 12, 2009

    It is interesting that individuals such as yourself continue to tout the benefit of organizations like GM offshoring more work while idling American workers. In this case it is particularly sickening as the taxpayer is stuck with the brunt of financing an organization that has been mismanaged for years both by the management and the union. There is something fundamental to the U.S. economic recovery that neither you nor a good portion of the American public understand: we must have a REAL G.D.P. A totally service based economy has not and will never work, especially with the dollar having no sound backing as it did in the days of the gold standard. When is the general populace of this country going to realize that they have been sold down the river and that America's economy is in the tank exactly because of viewpoints like yours? The economy is broken and overpaid bureaucrats and corporate directors as well as Wall St. economists like yourself have rocks in your head that our economy will ever recover with the continued wholesale slaughter of our workforce. This line of garbage started in the I.T. sector when there were more than adequate trained professionals here. It then broke loose in manufacturing and now has invaded our service sector as well as the ranks of accountants, engineers, and architects. Perhaps the best solution is to outsource Wall St. and get rid of individuals such as yourself that took an economics course based in heresy and not fact!

    Reply
  9. Ray Chez | June 12, 2009

    Good reading, it says that Obama wasn't to blame. It took many years for it to happen.

    Reply
  10. How China Could Rescue General Motors | June 12, 2009

    [...] [Editor’s Note: This is the second of two parts. See Part I by clicking here.] [...]

    Reply
  11. bbeck | June 12, 2009

    It really amazes me how dumb the American public, including its leaders are!! Several factors are not even mentioned in the discussion about GM. Instead the public keeps chewing on the simple minded sophomoric expressions that the Republicans toss around, like GM stands for "Government Motors". Wake up America!

    Here are the facts that must be addressed in the automobile marketplace or the manufacturing problems here in America will never be solved.
    (a) In your Grandfather's time and in your Father's time, American automobile manufacturers DESIGNED and BUILT vehicles and if the customers liked them they purchased the product. The customer's appetite for various models was conditioned by heavy mainstream advertising.

    (b) There are NEW Market demographics in the American automobile marketplace today! Generation X does not respond to the relentless drumbeat of national advertising and Grandpa and Dad are no longer the largest component of the current marketplace. The profile of the dominate consumer in the current car marketplace spotlights an individual who is much more likely to get excited about the newest Apple iphone than they are about the latest vehicular offerings from GM or Chrysler.

    (c) There is no IDENTITY FACTOR between automobiles and the personalities of Generation X consumers. Years ago Grandpa and Dad were proud to be known as "a Cadillac man", or "a Dodge man", or maybe "a Mustang man", etc. The car they drove became an integral part of how other people identified them, and hence became part of their own sense of self identification. This form of identity connection DOES NOT EXIST with generation X. They see their car primarily as a source of pleasant, DEPENDABLE transportation and that's it, no more, no less. Therefore in this respect, since the car is viewed exclusively as a utility, price is a very big issue.

    (d) Current and future generations will not buy an automobile just because it gets 40 to 50 MPG. They won't buy a car just because it has a 300 watt surround sound system inside. They will not pay attention to endless commercials and testimonies by movie stars about how great a certain car is. Generation X will only pay attention if the car you are selling addresses their sensibilities and presently NO American or foreign car manufacturer knows how to reach these folks.

    (e) GM must reach out to these folks via the medium enjoyed by Generation X and y, i.e., YouTube, Facebook, Tweeter, the internet, etc to GET IDEAS FOR THE DESIGN OF THE CAR that these people actually WANT! This requires INVOLVEMENT of the whole U.S. of A. GM & the Government must plan and execute these public appeal events like a military operation using the medium of TV. Maybe they can engage the American Idol people to help with the planning and execution of this critical outreach. Without some revolutionary marketing approach such as this, GM's rebirth will be short lived.

    Reply
  12. walter (jock) mitchell | June 13, 2009

    We have been raped by a management who thought it better to give in to unions than to fight. We have been raped by politicos who think the union jobs are necessary for votes.
    We will all feal the reality when the dollar is no longer worth what we will in the near, 2 to 3 years, future remember. The workers, GM employees all are also U.S. citizens, and it is also their dollars which will have little buying power.

    There is talk of building GM cars in china more cheaply than in the U.S., and then these cars will be imported to the U.S. to be sold here. To be sold to whom? We, all of us, will not have enough value in our dollars in order to buy them. There will be few who will be able to buy used cars which are 5 or less years old. Where is the quality there? Where is the value of the dollar there?

    These are politicos trying to push fluff on all of us in order for these same to be re-elected. I feal sorry for all of us. That sorry does NOT extend to the Wall Street ones who knew what was happening, nor to the Presidents Clinton and Bush who goaded Fannie and Freddie into those mortgages, nor to any and all mortgage brokers who knew but were too avaricious to care. My sympathy is not with those of us who took these loans, which i did. My sympathy is with those of us around the world who are completely blameless. The hardworking people who scarcely know what home ownership is. I am sympathetic to those who scarcely have an idea of what a next meal is.

    This reminds me of someone who once stole bread. Did not that, Sir, start a revolution?

    All of us need to know, some to remember, that God is not going to ask us how much money we have, but did we sell our soul for it.

    Reply
  13. Jerry | June 14, 2009

    GM is one of the companies that keeps the economy moving. Especially with the Military, included in the Big 5, the auto industry is a major factor in our economy. But letting other countries invest or buy into our economic indicator will prove to be problematic in the long run. I'm sorry, I do not agree with any country, such as Germany, Canada, France, or even Mexico, buying into a major economic stabilizer such as GM. I would be more satisfied if it were a small mom and pop company. The question is, do we have the same rights in their countries to buy into their economic stabilizers? I don't think so! If things continue in this direction, we could see a bigger shift than what we are seeing now. Entire states could end up belonging to other countries just because of the employment situation. Can you imagine……?

    Reply
  14. Rodzilla | June 14, 2009

    I find it ironic that one of the strategies of the GM turn around that you came up with was that GM should manufacture cars in China and ship them back to the US, we have already proved beyond a reasonable doubt that people without jobs don't buy cars! no matter where you build them. America has to redefine its economy, and once again build sustainable industry if it will ever have a hope paying or maintaining its National debt at a reasonable level! or will do we continue with the status quo and witness the ruin of the dollar, the US is teetering on having a currency equal to that of the post WW2 German Mark, the only thing that will save it is to restore confidence in the world market that the US can pay its debts, as it is now the daily interest is killing the US economy, this interest is being invested in the economies of foreign countries who hold US debt, not in creating jobs or infrastructure for the people of the US.

    Reply
  15. A T Cox | June 14, 2009

    The financial distress of the American auto companies, and of the U. S. financial system in general, has been a long time coming. A lot of this has to do with "cost-push" rather than "demand-pull" inflation. Just take costs of fifty years ago, and in some cases less than this, and move the decimal point over one place. In the 1960s Barry Goldwater in his book The Conscience of a Conservative, noted the problem of a monolithic United Auto Workers union, pitted against separate, competing auto companies, with detrimental effects on the auto manufacturers. His observations were prophetic, but he was brushed aside as an extremist. My income is above average (I am grateful for that), but I am unable to fit the astronomical cost of a new car into my budget, preferring to take the advice of many financial counselors, to buy a late model used car.

    Reply
  16. The "New" GM: What Will it Look Like, and How Far Will it Go? | July 13, 2009

    [...] Money Morning reported last month, the consumer backlash against GM's bankruptcy likely won't be as damaging as had been initially feared. In fact, as rival U.S. carmaker Chrysler already discovered in its own bankruptcy process, [...]

    Reply
  17. Why Asia Will Supplant Detroit as the Global Center of the Auto Industry  | January 15, 2010

    [...] United States, General Motors Corp. and Chrysler Group LLC have lost market share because of the government takeover. They are unlikely to get it back in spite of the debt costs they have relinquished through [...]

    Reply


Some HTML is OK