Unemployment Rises, Payroll Losses Far Exceed Analysts' Estimates

Email

By Bob Blandeburgo
Associate Editor
Money Morning

June's unemployment rate increase was less than economists were anticipating, but the overall number of jobs lost was substantially higher than expected.

The unemployment rate crept up to 9.5% last month – its highest level since 1983, according to the latest report from the U.S. Department of Labor. That's up from May's 9.4% rate. Total job losses for the month were 467,000, far below the 365,000 economists at Briefing.com expected, which were also slightly off on their estimate of a 9.6% unemployment rate.

Of the sectors hurt most by payroll losses, none was worse than the service-providing industry, which saw a loss of 244,000 jobs. That was followed by the goods-producing industry, which shed 223,000 jobs.

"The stimulus has probably stabilized income, but it has not moved the economy forward," Wachovia Corp. chief economist John E. Silvia said in an interview with The New York Times. "It's a finger in the dike. But in terms of getting the economy going, there's no evidence of that yet."

Underemployment, where desperate workers take jobs that are not meeting their desired compensation, hours or level of skill and experience, increased to 16.5% in June from 16.4% in May. The underemployment rate last month was the highest since the Labor Department started tracking it in 1994.

Some analysts, such as Themis Trading's Co-Manager of Trading Joe Saluzzi, believe underemployment is the "real" amount of unemployed people in the market.

"[16.5% is] the real amount if unemployed people out there. If anything you see wage growth is not there, hourly earnings and the workweek is lower. Now you have a recipe that is a mess here, because nothing is improving. People still want to say that unemployment is a lagging indicator, I don't get that," Saluzzi told Reuters."The only thing we've got going is stimulus, which is government, Fed type stuff. There's a lot of problems still. So people have to come back down to earth and realize where we are. This should not have been a surprise to anyone."

Indeed, the increasing unemployment is not a surprise considering analysts expect the unemployment rate to reach 10% or higher.
But with so many missed estimates, is it better to not predict these numbers at all?

According to Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald, the answer is yes.

"Predicting unemployment numbers is really a moot point," Fitz-Gerald said. "[The unemployment rate] is posted after the fact and are designed to produce wishful thinking. The reality is we have no idea what these numbers will look like six months from now."

According to Fitz-Gerald, the unemployment rate actually spurs innovation in business.

"If there is a good sign in all of this, it's that periods of economic strife tend to promote unprecedented entrepreneurship levels," he said.

When the recovery does happen, it is likely new jobs will be hard to come by as employers try to make up for lost profits by keeping payrolls leaner and expect existing workers to be more efficient.

News and Related Story Links:

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

  1. kettle2 | July 13, 2009

    increase employers share…they have to carry the load; like everyone else….increase working employees pay into…also create another payroll tax to help carry the load.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Rising unemployment is taking its toll on credit card delinquencies, which escalated to 6.6% in the first quarter, up from 5.5% in the fourth quarter, according to a American Bankers Association (ABA) report. More than a third of the 6 million jobs lost since the recession began in December 2007 occurred in the first quarter of this year, the ABA said. Late payments on home equity loans increased from 3% to 3.5%. "The number one driver of delinquencies is job loss," said ABA chief economist James Chessen.  "When people lose their jobs, they can't pay their bills.  Delinquencies won't improve until companies start hiring again and we see a significant economic turnaround." [...]

  2. [...] Long-term fixed mortgage rates in the United States fell to 5.20% in the week ended July 9, representing a 0.12% drop, according to Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE). That compares to a rate of 6.37% a year earlier. "Interest rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages fell for the second week in a row to the lowest level in six weeks amid market concerns over a weakening labor market," Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac's vice president and chief economist, said in a statement. The most recent jobs report showed the unemployment rate climbed to 9.5%. [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


eight + = 10

Some HTML is OK