<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Quality Stocks Ready to Take the Lead in the U.S. Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/09/21/high-quality-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/09/21/high-quality-stocks/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Stocks: How the "Beta Chase" Could Spark a Major Breakout for Exxon</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/09/21/high-quality-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-9300</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Stocks: How the "Beta Chase" Could Spark a Major Breakout for Exxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9012#comment-9300</guid>
		<description>[...] Now here&#8217;s a weird coincidence. You know that ExxonMobil has the largest capitalization in the market, which means it has the largest influence on the value of the Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Index. And you know that I have been forecasting that the S&amp;P 500 is likely headed to the 1,200 level. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now here's a weird coincidence. You know that ExxonMobil has the largest capitalization in the market, which means it has the largest influence on the value of the Standard &amp; Poor's 500 Index. And you know that I have been forecasting that the S&amp;P 500 is likely headed to the 1,200 level. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retailing Stocks and Stats Suggest the U.S. Stock Market Rally is For Real</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/09/21/high-quality-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-8537</link>
		<dc:creator>Retailing Stocks and Stats Suggest the U.S. Stock Market Rally is For Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9012#comment-8537</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning Week Ahead Column:  High-Quality Stocks Ready to Take the Lead in the U.S. Market. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning Week Ahead Column:  High-Quality Stocks Ready to Take the Lead in the U.S. Market. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Stocks: How the "Beta Chase" Could Spark a Major Breakout for Exxon</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/09/21/high-quality-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-7682</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Stocks: How the "Beta Chase" Could Spark a Major Breakout for Exxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9012#comment-7682</guid>
		<description>[...] Now here&#8217;s a weird coincidence. You know that ExxonMobil has the largest capitalization in the market, which means it has the largest influence on the value of the Standard  &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Index. And you know that I have been forecasting that the S&amp;P 500 is likely headed to the 1,200 level. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now here's a weird coincidence. You know that ExxonMobil has the largest capitalization in the market, which means it has the largest influence on the value of the Standard  &amp; Poor's 500 Index. And you know that I have been forecasting that the S&amp;P 500 is likely headed to the 1,200 level. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Busy Man Fitness</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/09/21/high-quality-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-7681</link>
		<dc:creator>Busy Man Fitness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9012#comment-7681</guid>
		<description>&quot;According to Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc.Chief Economist David Rosenberg, stocks are pricing in 4% U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth next year. If that’s correct, then anything less, no matter if it’s as high as 3.5%, would amount to a disappointment.&quot;

How? How are they pricing this in given the consumer is beaten down and we have little to export?

&quot;The good news is that she was &quot;happy to report that the downturn has probably run its course.&quot;&quot;

She sounds fairly confident?

I am very weary of the current statistical data made available.

However, I think you guys did a great job with this article. Very informative. Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"According to Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc.Chief Economist David Rosenberg, stocks are pricing in 4% U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth next year. If that’s correct, then anything less, no matter if it’s as high as 3.5%, would amount to a disappointment."</p>
<p>How? How are they pricing this in given the consumer is beaten down and we have little to export?</p>
<p>"The good news is that she was "happy to report that the downturn has probably run its course.""</p>
<p>She sounds fairly confident?</p>
<p>I am very weary of the current statistical data made available.</p>
<p>However, I think you guys did a great job with this article. Very informative. Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

