There is no correlation between rising CO2 and global temperature.

There is no observed evidence of the speeding up of Artic warming.

There are no observations that Greenland is melting faster.

There are no observations that show the Antartic Western sheet is doning something it has not done in the past.

How can so many wrong statements be in one post?

Those who think a science degree is needed to understand straight forward logic are fuel for puppet-masters who scam the world.

It would be more fruitful to pursue those who critique the GW alarmists. There are thousands more scientists who are opposed to GW pseudo science than who are conned by it. Many have signed published accords.

Okay – let's try basic logic – no need for science degrees.
The Last Ice Age peaked around 18,000 years ago.
Then it started to melt and by 10,000 years ago we had what is generally considered to be the end of the Last Ice Age.

What caused that to happen?
Answer – global warming!!!
Where was man?
Huddled in caves and tropical areas and probably numbered fewer people worldwide than now populates Western Europe (300 million).
Did they cause global warming? Hardly.

GW is a long cycle repeating phenomenon. A version of it occurs every 1,500 years and is unstoppable. (Google that = book title).

Yes, we had global warming. It was seized on as an opportuntiy by globalists to manipulate nations and global policies for UN control.
Check those who have participated in the process and became critics – some American, some Russian.

Digging deeper you will find that warming precedes CO2 build-up by hundreds of years – going back millennia in earth's record.
Vostock ice cores and others. Check it out.
CO2 does not cause global warming. That is flat out fraud. It is NOT science by any stretch.

1) Quoting AP stories and UN hacks regarding climate, as if these people have any clue or credibility about what they are talking about is laughable, and exposes the poster as as having highly questionable intellect. Unfortunately, far too many simply parrot what they've heard or read and are unable to analyze or think for themselves. This includes the simple observations in ones own life. I won't comment on Al Gore, he isn't worthy.

2) Martin's skepticism was presented in a very polite way, obviously wanting to make a point without angering or alienating … I applaud that and admire it … if only our elected officials could do the same. The skepticism is extremely well-founded. Unfortunately, I don't have Martins skill set in this area.

3) Those of you still drinking the koolaid for the 'man-made global warming' myth are the same people who screamed that we would for sure nuke ourselves (not), that we could NEVER feed or sustain 7 billion people on the planet (yet we are) that the Oceans would be dead not now, but 1 or 2 decades ago (but they're not), that we would all die from a new ice age (wrong), now we will die from a slow roasting (also wrong) … it NEVER ends with you folks and you know who you are. I should have been dead about 10 times over by now. You are emotionally dysfunctional and intellectually dishonest, and selfish and narcississtic … you really do believe everyone else should just go away or not even be born so you can live in some mythical utopia.

4) I cannot recall anybody, ever, being against a cleaner planet, better tech, better methods … a lot has been done in the last 40 years across a vast expanse of industries. Truly the World is in a much better position today to deal with these issues than in the 1800's or even up through the mid-20th century … lets tell the truth, debate, and SOLVE things through sensible changes and improvements not choose to go down the path of insanity and inaninity just so we can fool ourselves into 'feeling better.' By the way, lots of countries need sewage treatment plants far worse than a phony CO2 reduction … think people, really, just this once …

The attempt of the global warming alarmists to shut down debate has increased my skepticism. For one thing, it has focused my attention on just how many of them make a very nice living out of alarmism.

***
So your focus is on "How to make a living on global warming."

And then you make your living telling everyone else how it's done.

And then you say use sandbags on the Maldives. Brilliant.

Would you please replace my post with this corrected version? -Many Thanks – G55

Quoting Trey Gilmore :
“Why not compare and contrast your credentials in the sciences v. the 2,500 scientists who make the case for global warming? ”

31,478 American Scientists (myself included) have signed a petition that says there is no scientific justification for any action to avoid global warming.

9,029 of those hold PhDs including the signature featured on the welcome page(link below) – Edward Teller.

I am quite proud to share this cause with Dr. Teller, even if posthumously on his part.
Geophys55

31,478 American Scientist (myself included) have signed a petition that says there is no scientific justification for any action to avoid global warming.

9,029 of those hold PhDs including the signature featured on the welcome page(link below) – Edward Teller.

I am quite proud to share this cause with Dr. Teller, even if posthumously on his part.
Geophys55

http://www.petitionproject.org/