<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Timothy Geithner A Roadblock to Regulatory Reform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd's Plan for Financial Reform as Ambitious as it is Antagonistic</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7965</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd's Plan for Financial Reform as Ambitious as it is Antagonistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7965</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning:  Is Timothy Geithner A Roadblock to Regulatory Reform? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning:  Is Timothy Geithner A Roadblock to Regulatory Reform? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geithner and Summers Protect Free Market Mantle Against Regulatory Reform</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator>Geithner and Summers Protect Free Market Mantle Against Regulatory Reform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7964</guid>
		<description>[...] Frontline story raises new questions about Geithner&#8217;s role in financial regulatory reform at a time when he is already being criticized his continued ties to Wall Street and his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frontline story raises new questions about Geithner&rsquo;s role in financial regulatory reform at a time when he is already being criticized his continued ties to Wall Street and his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Comesana</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7902</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Comesana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7902</guid>
		<description>&quot;You that come for true solutions for the crisis forget all your hopes&quot; ....because we are in the hands of a Ponzi gang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"You that come for true solutions for the crisis forget all your hopes" &#8230;.because we are in the hands of a Ponzi gang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew du Boulay</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew du Boulay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>Jacob Steelman&#039;s comment:
&#039;A global economy needs one private currency as a medium of exchange for private commerce and finance...&#039;  is impossible to agree with (specifically the &#039;private currency&#039; bit) because that is exactly the situation that exists now and is the reason why the Western monetary system is so messed up.

The US economy (and hence most of the World) already has a &#039;private currency&#039;, ie the US dollar which is mobilised by the private banks that own the Fed.


Recognise the US government has not controlled the issuance of currency in the US since 1913. The US Fed is privately owned ~ it creates the money the US government spends.

In Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982), the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ruled that the Federal Reserve Banks are ‘independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations’, and there is not ‘sufficient federal government control over detailed physical performance and day to day operation’ of the Federal Reserve Bank for it to be considered a federal agency.


The Lewis judgement continues:

&#039;Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stockholding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank&#039;s nine member board of directors. The remaining three directors are appointed by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks, but direct supervision and control of each Bank is exercised by its board of directors. 12 U.S.C. Sect. 301. The directors enact by-laws regulating the manner of conducting general Bank business, 12 U.S.C. Sect. 341, and appoint officers to implement and supervise daily Bank activities. These activities include collecting and clearing checks, making advances to private and commercial entities, holding reserves for member banks, discounting the notes of member banks, and buying and selling securities on the open market. See 12 U.S.C. Sub-Sect. 341-361...

...Each Bank is statutorily empowered to conduct these activities without day to day direction from the federal government&#039;.

The major shareholders of the Federal Reserve System of Banks* are the ones responsible for every credit squeeze throughout the twentieth century** and now they are doing the same thing.

Withholding lending, to cripple an economy, which then necesitates the government to borrow more money from the world bankers, of which the American taxpayer will be forever indebted, is a strategy that the Rothschild Banking dynasty has repeated for several hundred years.

The whole game has been perpetuated by the distorted belief that money must be borrowed from someone in order to generate economic activity... Money is an illusion, it is created!

It is time for the government to bust the dependance on private money and resume its Constitutional responsibilities ie:

Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can &#039;coin money and regulate the value thereof&#039;. The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency. The present system of allowing private banks in America to control money supply is at odds with the Supreme Law of the United States.


*Federal Reserve Directors: &#039;A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence&#039;. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976.


** Emry, S. (c. 1982) &#039;Billions for the Bankers - Debts for the People:The Real Story of the Money-Control Over America&#039;, available at; http://www.justiceplus.org/bankers.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob Steelman's comment:<br />
'A global economy needs one private currency as a medium of exchange for private commerce and finance&#8230;'  is impossible to agree with (specifically the 'private currency' bit) because that is exactly the situation that exists now and is the reason why the Western monetary system is so messed up.</p>
<p>The US economy (and hence most of the World) already has a 'private currency', ie the US dollar which is mobilised by the private banks that own the Fed.</p>
<p>Recognise the US government has not controlled the issuance of currency in the US since 1913. The US Fed is privately owned ~ it creates the money the US government spends.</p>
<p>In Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982), the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ruled that the Federal Reserve Banks are ‘independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations’, and there is not ‘sufficient federal government control over detailed physical performance and day to day operation’ of the Federal Reserve Bank for it to be considered a federal agency.</p>
<p>The Lewis judgement continues:</p>
<p>'Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stockholding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors. The remaining three directors are appointed by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks, but direct supervision and control of each Bank is exercised by its board of directors. 12 U.S.C. Sect. 301. The directors enact by-laws regulating the manner of conducting general Bank business, 12 U.S.C. Sect. 341, and appoint officers to implement and supervise daily Bank activities. These activities include collecting and clearing checks, making advances to private and commercial entities, holding reserves for member banks, discounting the notes of member banks, and buying and selling securities on the open market. See 12 U.S.C. Sub-Sect. 341-361&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;Each Bank is statutorily empowered to conduct these activities without day to day direction from the federal government'.</p>
<p>The major shareholders of the Federal Reserve System of Banks* are the ones responsible for every credit squeeze throughout the twentieth century** and now they are doing the same thing.</p>
<p>Withholding lending, to cripple an economy, which then necesitates the government to borrow more money from the world bankers, of which the American taxpayer will be forever indebted, is a strategy that the Rothschild Banking dynasty has repeated for several hundred years.</p>
<p>The whole game has been perpetuated by the distorted belief that money must be borrowed from someone in order to generate economic activity&#8230; Money is an illusion, it is created!</p>
<p>It is time for the government to bust the dependance on private money and resume its Constitutional responsibilities ie:</p>
<p>Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can 'coin money and regulate the value thereof'. The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency. The present system of allowing private banks in America to control money supply is at odds with the Supreme Law of the United States.</p>
<p>*Federal Reserve Directors: 'A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence'. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976.</p>
<p>** Emry, S. (c. 1982) 'Billions for the Bankers &#8211; Debts for the People:The Real Story of the Money-Control Over America', available at; http://www.justiceplus.org/bankers.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forex</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7900</link>
		<dc:creator>Forex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7900</guid>
		<description>thx for the info - this Timothy Geithner dude is something, isn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx for the info &#8211; this Timothy Geithner dude is something, isn't he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s all a ponzi scheme... it&#039;s been a ponzi scheme and every &quot;recession&quot; was always corrected with an expansion of debt... now the tax payers are providing the source of the expansion of debt and this new bubble will collapse. we must end the pyramid scheme, but jacob is absolutely wrong. we need a competent, strong government, because that is the only entity answerable to democratic process. the free market is a myth and currency must be controlled by an entity for the public good. take the power of money away from the financial institutions and put it back into the hands of GOVERNMENT... we must take the step back from feudalism and move back to the nation state system. we live in a sovereign republic, now a feudalistic state dominated by interests of the elite. take it back now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it's all a ponzi scheme&#8230; it's been a ponzi scheme and every "recession" was always corrected with an expansion of debt&#8230; now the tax payers are providing the source of the expansion of debt and this new bubble will collapse. we must end the pyramid scheme, but jacob is absolutely wrong. we need a competent, strong government, because that is the only entity answerable to democratic process. the free market is a myth and currency must be controlled by an entity for the public good. take the power of money away from the financial institutions and put it back into the hands of GOVERNMENT&#8230; we must take the step back from feudalism and move back to the nation state system. we live in a sovereign republic, now a feudalistic state dominated by interests of the elite. take it back now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Wilson</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7891</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7891</guid>
		<description>Geithner...another man from Wall Street..Goldman sachs...he IS NOT what we need in the treasury department...must look closer at his resume....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geithner&#8230;another man from Wall Street..Goldman sachs&#8230;he IS NOT what we need in the treasury department&#8230;must look closer at his resume&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Henderson</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7892</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7892</guid>
		<description>This is a great article explaining what is really going on at Treasury; and why financial reform affecting Wall Street bonuses and toxic deriviative asset sales resulted in unintented consequences of &quot;more of the same&quot; - instead of essential reform.  Keep up the good work of exposing conflicts of interest in the Government, which should not exist among regulators.  Let&#039;s hope the budding recovery won&#039;t stem necessary reforms, so that the nation is still vulnerable to the excess greed which has been the economy&#039;s downfall.  Without curing the  causes of the current recession, the nation is still vulnerable to more of the same in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article explaining what is really going on at Treasury; and why financial reform affecting Wall Street bonuses and toxic deriviative asset sales resulted in unintented consequences of "more of the same" &#8211; instead of essential reform.  Keep up the good work of exposing conflicts of interest in the Government, which should not exist among regulators.  Let's hope the budding recovery won't stem necessary reforms, so that the nation is still vulnerable to the excess greed which has been the economy's downfall.  Without curing the  causes of the current recession, the nation is still vulnerable to more of the same in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viswa Ranjan Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7893</link>
		<dc:creator>Viswa Ranjan Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7893</guid>
		<description>Treasury and Fed are two different puzzles. The former deals with Fiscal policy while the latter deals with Monetary.

If anyone thought that a banker would be able to do justice to Fiscal responsibilities should have thought twice. Geithner was definitely a wrong choice. There were much better eligible candidates for the Treasury role - Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, et al. I was truly sad to see a bureaucrat from the Fed pick up the reigns of Fiscal policy. And, indeed, Geithner has successfully reduced a big chunk of the Fiscal stimulus into a Monetary push (&quot;pushing on the string&quot; as Keynes would have said) to stimulate the economy! Truly sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treasury and Fed are two different puzzles. The former deals with Fiscal policy while the latter deals with Monetary.</p>
<p>If anyone thought that a banker would be able to do justice to Fiscal responsibilities should have thought twice. Geithner was definitely a wrong choice. There were much better eligible candidates for the Treasury role &#8211; Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, et al. I was truly sad to see a bureaucrat from the Fed pick up the reigns of Fiscal policy. And, indeed, Geithner has successfully reduced a big chunk of the Fiscal stimulus into a Monetary push ("pushing on the string" as Keynes would have said) to stimulate the economy! Truly sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Chan</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/19/geithner-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7894</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9476#comment-7894</guid>
		<description>The next financial meltdown will certainly split U.S. into pieces,if the president does not take a corrective action to prevent it from happening. The government should laid down some rules and regulations to curb greed level of these Wall Street big boys for the national interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next financial meltdown will certainly split U.S. into pieces,if the president does not take a corrective action to prevent it from happening. The government should laid down some rules and regulations to curb greed level of these Wall Street big boys for the national interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

