<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Money Morning Interview: The Future of Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:17:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JOE POWELL</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7924</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE POWELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9601#comment-7924</guid>
		<description>Mr. Patalon,

Thank you. Will look forward to additional energy articles.

Sincerely,
Joe Powell, Retired</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Patalon,</p>
<p>Thank you. Will look forward to additional energy articles.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Joe Powell, Retired</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenton weaver</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7925</link>
		<dc:creator>kenton weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9601#comment-7925</guid>
		<description>I am surprised this article did not mention IOC which has one of the largest finds in recent years. IOC is positioned well for the China trade as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised this article did not mention IOC which has one of the largest finds in recent years. IOC is positioned well for the China trade as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Patalon III</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7928</link>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9601#comment-7928</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Powell:

      Thanks for the note. As we noted in the epilogue comment at the end of the article, there was no way to cover everything in this one piece. And as we also said ... stay tuned, for there&#039;s more to come.

       Again, thanks for taking the time to comment, and for enabling us to reiterate this point.

      Hope to hear from you again....

      Respectfully;

     William Patalon III
    Executive Editor
   Money Morning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Powell:</p>
<p>      Thanks for the note. As we noted in the epilogue comment at the end of the article, there was no way to cover everything in this one piece. And as we also said &#8230; stay tuned, for there&#8217;s more to come.</p>
<p>       Again, thanks for taking the time to comment, and for enabling us to reiterate this point.</p>
<p>      Hope to hear from you again&#8230;.</p>
<p>      Respectfully;</p>
<p>     William Patalon III<br />
    Executive Editor<br />
   Money Morning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE POWELL</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7922</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE POWELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9601#comment-7922</guid>
		<description>I SAW NOTHING ABOUT COAL IN GENERAL ( FOR ELECTRICITY OR OTHER MEANS) NOR ABOUT NUCLEAR FUEL USED FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION. WHY NOT? ANOTHER INCOMPLETE ENERGY PERSPECTIVE? OR WAS THIS ONLY AN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I SAW NOTHING ABOUT COAL IN GENERAL ( FOR ELECTRICITY OR OTHER MEANS) NOR ABOUT NUCLEAR FUEL USED FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION. WHY NOT? ANOTHER INCOMPLETE ENERGY PERSPECTIVE? OR WAS THIS ONLY AN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Conrad A. Lohutko</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/22/kent-moors-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7926</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Conrad A. Lohutko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=9601#comment-7926</guid>
		<description>You may not be aware that one of the greatest scientific transformations of all time is taking place in the field of production of electricity. Basically, it is now possible to produce more electricity from an advanced turbine generation system than is consumed in the process of electricity generation. I am the owner of the companies involved in this revolution. Many other countries, especially the US, Russia, and China, are aware of these developments and sometimes appear to desire to be investors. However, I am having major problems with companies and countries having vested interests in maintaining the status quo.

      I have two billionaire American investors sitting on the fence because of intensive lobbying efforts by the energy industry, which is determined to stop technological progress. The stakes are very high for the US and the world.  Since I won&#039;t be stopped, cheap energy may soon be in the hands of just a few countries. This was not my intent. My intent was to license the technology world-wide with the US as the engineering and production base. This will create a million high paying jobs and help restore our manufacturing base.
     Incidentally, the engineering estimates for the production costs per KWH are only .0125 cents. This makes my system the lowest cost producer for electricity. There is currently only a test system. A production quality system needs to be built with additional funds from private investors or international bodies. The system is initially for the production of electricity, but may be eventually adapted to power vehicles, trains, and ships. It is also a zero emission system, 100% clean, and non-polluting. The electricity is self-generating and mileage for vehicles would be virtually unlimited.
     As far as the issue of job creation is concerned, at the very worst there would be no negative impact in numbers. The new jobs would most likely involve higher level and paying skills.
     The concept for the system and the initial design work were from my father, Floryan A. Lohutko, who just happened to create the silicon wafer chip at Xerox and the pulse engine for secret US aircraft.
     This new technology is very real and has taken 29 years to develop. Can you see the need for an international Manhattan Project type of program? It would mean energy independence, zero pollution, and reasonable electricity on a world-wide basis. It would literally usher in a new age of economic growth because almost everyone on earth could have dependable electricity.
     Of course, if a few countries get first or exclusive use of the new technology, which is their primary interest, their economies will thrive on low cost, clean energy, and the rest of the world will be either held hostage or stuck in the fossil fuels age.
    I sincerely believe that the US will remain in the fossil fuels age because the US has really chosen business as usual. We should have enough sense to lock in this transformational electric technology, but resistance is very great so other nations will benefit.

Conrad A. Lohutko, Ph.D.
President of Agile Logistics Technology, LLC,
International Hydropower, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may not be aware that one of the greatest scientific transformations of all time is taking place in the field of production of electricity. Basically, it is now possible to produce more electricity from an advanced turbine generation system than is consumed in the process of electricity generation. I am the owner of the companies involved in this revolution. Many other countries, especially the US, Russia, and China, are aware of these developments and sometimes appear to desire to be investors. However, I am having major problems with companies and countries having vested interests in maintaining the status quo.</p>
<p>      I have two billionaire American investors sitting on the fence because of intensive lobbying efforts by the energy industry, which is determined to stop technological progress. The stakes are very high for the US and the world.  Since I won&#8217;t be stopped, cheap energy may soon be in the hands of just a few countries. This was not my intent. My intent was to license the technology world-wide with the US as the engineering and production base. This will create a million high paying jobs and help restore our manufacturing base.<br />
     Incidentally, the engineering estimates for the production costs per KWH are only .0125 cents. This makes my system the lowest cost producer for electricity. There is currently only a test system. A production quality system needs to be built with additional funds from private investors or international bodies. The system is initially for the production of electricity, but may be eventually adapted to power vehicles, trains, and ships. It is also a zero emission system, 100% clean, and non-polluting. The electricity is self-generating and mileage for vehicles would be virtually unlimited.<br />
     As far as the issue of job creation is concerned, at the very worst there would be no negative impact in numbers. The new jobs would most likely involve higher level and paying skills.<br />
     The concept for the system and the initial design work were from my father, Floryan A. Lohutko, who just happened to create the silicon wafer chip at Xerox and the pulse engine for secret US aircraft.<br />
     This new technology is very real and has taken 29 years to develop. Can you see the need for an international Manhattan Project type of program? It would mean energy independence, zero pollution, and reasonable electricity on a world-wide basis. It would literally usher in a new age of economic growth because almost everyone on earth could have dependable electricity.<br />
     Of course, if a few countries get first or exclusive use of the new technology, which is their primary interest, their economies will thrive on low cost, clean energy, and the rest of the world will be either held hostage or stuck in the fossil fuels age.<br />
    I sincerely believe that the US will remain in the fossil fuels age because the US has really chosen business as usual. We should have enough sense to lock in this transformational electric technology, but resistance is very great so other nations will benefit.</p>
<p>Conrad A. Lohutko, Ph.D.<br />
President of Agile Logistics Technology, LLC,<br />
International Hydropower, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
