<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never &quot;Short&quot; a Country That Has $2 Trillion in Cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-19968</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-19968</guid>
		<description>Barry - 

Everything you have said about &quot;here&quot; is right - commit a serious crime in China and you are never seen again. Be unproductive, and you do not eat. 

I have lived here for close to two years in Shanghai and I have traveled to almost every corner of China, and I too was enamored by their ability to DO -- for a short while. It is very refreshing coming from the US and seeing streets be redone in a matter of days and buildings go up in a matter of months. Its refreshing to see murderers sent &quot;away&quot; and the wastrels of society not living off of the &quot;do-ers&quot; tax money.

However, what you (and most people) fail to grasp on your three week or one month or six week trips galavanting around China is that the definitions of serious crime and what leads to the have-nots of this society &quot;not having&quot;. A serious crime in the country can be anything from stealing a loaf of bread in some areas to murdering your Neighbor. 

The problem is there IS NO JUSTICE SYSTEM. No protection for citizens. Everyone lives in fear, including me as an ex-pat. All the while migrant workers are being executed for stealing Ipods while the richest men in china, and even the middle class small business owners, are receiving and giving kick backs and bribes in the amounts of 100 of millions of RMB every single day. You cannot do business here without getting your hand very, very dirty and that is not capitalism to me. 

To that point, I have watched my friend beat to within an inch of his life because he offended the wrong person... and when we called the police they watched while it happened. Moreover, to my point before about murdering neighbors, a man was just release for jail after 15 years when the neighbor he murdered suddenly showed back up for a government hand out only available in their hometown. It was a government sponsored conspiracy in shenzhen against the guy put away because he refused to move his factory.

If you did more than just took pictures and boarded airplanes in China, you would probably see it in a little bit of a different light.

I will thank China for one thing; I have a new found respect for freedom of speech, government, regulations, police officers, and the justice system. Things we take for granted, and more often than not protest against and bitch about, are sorely missed when they are taken away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry &#8211; </p>
<p>Everything you have said about "here" is right &#8211; commit a serious crime in China and you are never seen again. Be unproductive, and you do not eat. </p>
<p>I have lived here for close to two years in Shanghai and I have traveled to almost every corner of China, and I too was enamored by their ability to DO &#8212; for a short while. It is very refreshing coming from the US and seeing streets be redone in a matter of days and buildings go up in a matter of months. Its refreshing to see murderers sent "away" and the wastrels of society not living off of the "do-ers" tax money.</p>
<p>However, what you (and most people) fail to grasp on your three week or one month or six week trips galavanting around China is that the definitions of serious crime and what leads to the have-nots of this society "not having". A serious crime in the country can be anything from stealing a loaf of bread in some areas to murdering your Neighbor. </p>
<p>The problem is there IS NO JUSTICE SYSTEM. No protection for citizens. Everyone lives in fear, including me as an ex-pat. All the while migrant workers are being executed for stealing Ipods while the richest men in china, and even the middle class small business owners, are receiving and giving kick backs and bribes in the amounts of 100 of millions of RMB every single day. You cannot do business here without getting your hand very, very dirty and that is not capitalism to me. </p>
<p>To that point, I have watched my friend beat to within an inch of his life because he offended the wrong person&#8230; and when we called the police they watched while it happened. Moreover, to my point before about murdering neighbors, a man was just release for jail after 15 years when the neighbor he murdered suddenly showed back up for a government hand out only available in their hometown. It was a government sponsored conspiracy in shenzhen against the guy put away because he refused to move his factory.</p>
<p>If you did more than just took pictures and boarded airplanes in China, you would probably see it in a little bit of a different light.</p>
<p>I will thank China for one thing; I have a new found respect for freedom of speech, government, regulations, police officers, and the justice system. Things we take for granted, and more often than not protest against and bitch about, are sorely missed when they are taken away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11714</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11714</guid>
		<description>Its hard to think long term when you are worried about the next election, unlike western democracy China does not have this restriction. It is time for western politicians to stop being selfish and think of their countries future and kids. Such a brave person would be suprised by the support of the masses as most voters think long term and want to leave the world a better place for the next generation. Long term thinking is the key to sustainable prosperity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its hard to think long term when you are worried about the next election, unlike western democracy China does not have this restriction. It is time for western politicians to stop being selfish and think of their countries future and kids. Such a brave person would be suprised by the support of the masses as most voters think long term and want to leave the world a better place for the next generation. Long term thinking is the key to sustainable prosperity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Elder</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11713</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11713</guid>
		<description>It is always amusing when otherwise intelligent people call present day China communist. By what measure would you call the most successful example of capitalism in the past 20 years collectivist, communist, or even socialist? 

As to China&#039;s long term future, building infrastructure and planning ahead to encourage growth can certainly produce better results than the bankster kleptocracy clusterfuck that the USA is saddled with.  But in the long run it can&#039;t triumph over the laws of physics and mathematics.  Exponential growth of anything-- population, energy use, automobile production, or an economy is physically impossible. At a 8% growth rate, it  takes less than a century  to leave only one square meter of the earths surface for each human or automobile. 

The maximum amount of oil per year that will ever be produced from the earth&#039;s finite resource is 85-90 mbd, and that peak likely was reached 2 years ago and has plateaued or is on a downward slope.  If China&#039;s population were to  reach the US standard of auto ownership it would require they use all the worlds&#039; oil supply or that the cars never drive anywhere on all those new roads being built.  Perhaps they could serve as residences like they now do in the US for people forced from their homes by foreclosure.

China gets 70% of its total energy supply from coal, and at current rates of growth will reach its maximum peak in terms of energy content within 15 years. Imports from Australia can&#039;t begin to fire all the boilers under construction. There is no way that any effort to develop wind and solar can fill the depletion gap and support continued growth in energy production in the time frame available.

Fossil fuel energy is the lifeblood of industrial society and agriculture, and without growth in energy supply China&#039;s industrialization has no possibility of continued long term exponential growth no matter what its leaders do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always amusing when otherwise intelligent people call present day China communist. By what measure would you call the most successful example of capitalism in the past 20 years collectivist, communist, or even socialist? </p>
<p>As to China's long term future, building infrastructure and planning ahead to encourage growth can certainly produce better results than the bankster kleptocracy clusterfuck that the USA is saddled with.  But in the long run it can't triumph over the laws of physics and mathematics.  Exponential growth of anything&#8211; population, energy use, automobile production, or an economy is physically impossible. At a 8% growth rate, it  takes less than a century  to leave only one square meter of the earths surface for each human or automobile. </p>
<p>The maximum amount of oil per year that will ever be produced from the earth's finite resource is 85-90 mbd, and that peak likely was reached 2 years ago and has plateaued or is on a downward slope.  If China's population were to  reach the US standard of auto ownership it would require they use all the worlds' oil supply or that the cars never drive anywhere on all those new roads being built.  Perhaps they could serve as residences like they now do in the US for people forced from their homes by foreclosure.</p>
<p>China gets 70% of its total energy supply from coal, and at current rates of growth will reach its maximum peak in terms of energy content within 15 years. Imports from Australia can't begin to fire all the boilers under construction. There is no way that any effort to develop wind and solar can fill the depletion gap and support continued growth in energy production in the time frame available.</p>
<p>Fossil fuel energy is the lifeblood of industrial society and agriculture, and without growth in energy supply China's industrialization has no possibility of continued long term exponential growth no matter what its leaders do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11711</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11711</guid>
		<description>Anyone interested in global investing is doing themselves and their families a disservice not visiting China and see this country up close and personal. I spent 3 weeks there last year and visited their major cities. It was the most eye opening experience of my life. I am 65 and have been all over the world. IMHO this is the most capitalistic country in the world. They have no crime and no welfare. If you are unproductive you don&#039;t eat. Commit a serious crime and you also don&#039;t eat ever again. Try to imagine what the US could be with no crime or welfare and the liberals wanting everyone to be a victim and letting the nanny state take care of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone interested in global investing is doing themselves and their families a disservice not visiting China and see this country up close and personal. I spent 3 weeks there last year and visited their major cities. It was the most eye opening experience of my life. I am 65 and have been all over the world. IMHO this is the most capitalistic country in the world. They have no crime and no welfare. If you are unproductive you don't eat. Commit a serious crime and you also don't eat ever again. Try to imagine what the US could be with no crime or welfare and the liberals wanting everyone to be a victim and letting the nanny state take care of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heino Hinrichsen</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11709</link>
		<dc:creator>Heino Hinrichsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11709</guid>
		<description>I have worked in china for many years, The growth is just amazing, They plan for the future not just a few years or until the next election. and its huge plans, i think the last big plan in the States was the Hoover Dam. They are leaving the whole world behind. And people thats a fact!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked in china for many years, The growth is just amazing, They plan for the future not just a few years or until the next election. and its huge plans, i think the last big plan in the States was the Hoover Dam. They are leaving the whole world behind. And people thats a fact!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11707</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11707</guid>
		<description>Great points!!

I agree it&#039;s just a correction, and trigerred by goverment force plus background situation, which is a right lead for now. Anybody go there to see and understand what&#039;s happenning would realize the points, the key is it&#039;s the most powerful growing economic nation right now.

Any markets are always up and down, and my prediction for current China stock market is between 2900-3500 shaking for a while. Let&#039;s see how we can profit from it is most important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points!!</p>
<p>I agree it's just a correction, and trigerred by goverment force plus background situation, which is a right lead for now. Anybody go there to see and understand what's happenning would realize the points, the key is it's the most powerful growing economic nation right now.</p>
<p>Any markets are always up and down, and my prediction for current China stock market is between 2900-3500 shaking for a while. Let's see how we can profit from it is most important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ungsuh kenneth park</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11705</link>
		<dc:creator>ungsuh kenneth park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11705</guid>
		<description>During the 30 years of near continuous growth in Korea, we experienced four times of real estate bubbles. The average real estate price jumped each time by about 300 to 400 %.  However we never experienced burst of any of these bubbles because of the simple fact that  real estate supply is fixed and the price jumps as more liquidity becomes available to the community. 
Rapid growth is always associated with mild inflationary condition and people knew that real estate is the best protection against  inflation. Korean finacial sector was, however,  basically a closed economy during the most of high growth period, and China is very open for portfolio investment and speculative investment. And real estate supply of China is far more flexible than in Korea. My feeling is that except in the center of major cities of China, the real estate bubbles will have to burst from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 30 years of near continuous growth in Korea, we experienced four times of real estate bubbles. The average real estate price jumped each time by about 300 to 400 %.  However we never experienced burst of any of these bubbles because of the simple fact that  real estate supply is fixed and the price jumps as more liquidity becomes available to the community.<br />
Rapid growth is always associated with mild inflationary condition and people knew that real estate is the best protection against  inflation. Korean finacial sector was, however,  basically a closed economy during the most of high growth period, and China is very open for portfolio investment and speculative investment. And real estate supply of China is far more flexible than in Korea. My feeling is that except in the center of major cities of China, the real estate bubbles will have to burst from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roberto</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11703</link>
		<dc:creator>roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11703</guid>
		<description>Bubble Schmubble. The difference that will keep China from making the huge dumb mistakes recently made by most western countries is  -  China&#039;s politicians do not have to pander to any special interest groups or anyone at all.

If China&#039;s leaders want to change something they change it. If they want to build/tear down something they do it. If they want to drill for oil, develop a new mine, raise/lower interest rates, burn coal, change a law, force workers to work for next to nothing - they just do it.

We may not like what they do, but those are the reasons China is not in a bubble and will not be in a bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bubble Schmubble. The difference that will keep China from making the huge dumb mistakes recently made by most western countries is  &#8211;  China's politicians do not have to pander to any special interest groups or anyone at all.</p>
<p>If China's leaders want to change something they change it. If they want to build/tear down something they do it. If they want to drill for oil, develop a new mine, raise/lower interest rates, burn coal, change a law, force workers to work for next to nothing &#8211; they just do it.</p>
<p>We may not like what they do, but those are the reasons China is not in a bubble and will not be in a bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Pearsall</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11692</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Pearsall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11692</guid>
		<description>Oh, OK, but WE&#039;VE got the world&#039;s highest military spending, two interminable foreign wars at the same time, and troops in 108 different countries (or whatever it is)! What&#039;s infrastructure creation and a $2,000,000,000,000 cash kitty (2 trillion with all the zeroes written out!) compared to all that? Apparently the Chinese will have a national public health insurance system before the USA ever does, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, OK, but WE'VE got the world's highest military spending, two interminable foreign wars at the same time, and troops in 108 different countries (or whatever it is)! What's infrastructure creation and a $2,000,000,000,000 cash kitty (2 trillion with all the zeroes written out!) compared to all that? Apparently the Chinese will have a national public health insurance system before the USA ever does, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11691</link>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11691</guid>
		<description>am i the only one that sees that the $2 trillion China has is a direct result of all the U.S. sends their way?  At what point will we as a country stop &#039;feeding&#039; all the other countries of the world and start to feed our own. Of the milliions of jobs lost in our country -- it is because everything from our cars, to our clothes, to our food/fish, to our own American flag are sent off to China to produce.   I only hope it isn&#039;t too late for our children, grandchildren and beyond to actually belong to the Chinese government.   Oh said, our government and each of us isn&#039;t taking the time to look at what is in our own backyards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i the only one that sees that the $2 trillion China has is a direct result of all the U.S. sends their way?  At what point will we as a country stop 'feeding' all the other countries of the world and start to feed our own. Of the milliions of jobs lost in our country &#8212; it is because everything from our cars, to our clothes, to our food/fish, to our own American flag are sent off to China to produce.   I only hope it isn't too late for our children, grandchildren and beyond to actually belong to the Chinese government.   Oh said, our government and each of us isn't taking the time to look at what is in our own backyards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Banks</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11686</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11686</guid>
		<description>Excellent article, your commentary is insightful and eye-opening.  However, there is a significant error in the final paragraph, an error that is common, but nonetheless disconcerting from an idealogical perspective.

As many people do today, you have incorrectly mixed political and economic terms.  The words Communism, Socialism, Capitalism, Democracy, Fascism, andTotalitarianism are not all points on the same continuum.  The first three are economic systems; the latter three are political systems.

You stated the following: &quot;we&#039;re the only ones who have decided that democracy is a prerequisite for capitalism. Chinese business people have decided that communism works just fine when it comes to creating wealth. &quot;  This is an extremely deceptive statement, which seems to imply that China is practicing capitalism.  They are not.

In fact, no one, East or West, has declared democracy and capitalism as two sides of the same coin.  There are many other political systems that can combine with a capitalist economic system.  The West has simply correctly identified democracy and capitalism as the preferable options.

However, what is completely incompatible in your assertion is that China, an avowed communist state, has adopted capitalism.  These two systems cannot coexist.  Communism has proven incapable, in the long term, of &quot;creating wealth.&quot;  Even in this short term where Chinese Communism will create wealth, the wealth is held and controlled by the government.  The definition of communism is an economic system where the means of production, and the products thereof, are controlled by the government.

The relativistic use of terms such as &quot;chinese businessman&quot; lead casual observes to soften their view of the Chinese system.  Unlike a western businessman, the Chinese businessman does not reap the rewards of his ingenuity, and does not risk his own economic resources.  Cultural pressures replace economic incentives.  Shame replaces dollars as motivation.

We must remember that the Chinese Communist Dictatorship still, as a tenet of their belief system, actively thwarts the people&#039;s impulse to improve their conditions, be it economically, culturally, religiously, or socially.  The West does not demand democracy as a standard, but it must demand freedom as a standard.

www.grahambanks.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, your commentary is insightful and eye-opening.  However, there is a significant error in the final paragraph, an error that is common, but nonetheless disconcerting from an idealogical perspective.</p>
<p>As many people do today, you have incorrectly mixed political and economic terms.  The words Communism, Socialism, Capitalism, Democracy, Fascism, andTotalitarianism are not all points on the same continuum.  The first three are economic systems; the latter three are political systems.</p>
<p>You stated the following: "we're the only ones who have decided that democracy is a prerequisite for capitalism. Chinese business people have decided that communism works just fine when it comes to creating wealth. "  This is an extremely deceptive statement, which seems to imply that China is practicing capitalism.  They are not.</p>
<p>In fact, no one, East or West, has declared democracy and capitalism as two sides of the same coin.  There are many other political systems that can combine with a capitalist economic system.  The West has simply correctly identified democracy and capitalism as the preferable options.</p>
<p>However, what is completely incompatible in your assertion is that China, an avowed communist state, has adopted capitalism.  These two systems cannot coexist.  Communism has proven incapable, in the long term, of "creating wealth."  Even in this short term where Chinese Communism will create wealth, the wealth is held and controlled by the government.  The definition of communism is an economic system where the means of production, and the products thereof, are controlled by the government.</p>
<p>The relativistic use of terms such as "chinese businessman" lead casual observes to soften their view of the Chinese system.  Unlike a western businessman, the Chinese businessman does not reap the rewards of his ingenuity, and does not risk his own economic resources.  Cultural pressures replace economic incentives.  Shame replaces dollars as motivation.</p>
<p>We must remember that the Chinese Communist Dictatorship still, as a tenet of their belief system, actively thwarts the people's impulse to improve their conditions, be it economically, culturally, religiously, or socially.  The West does not demand democracy as a standard, but it must demand freedom as a standard.</p>
<p>http://www.grahambanks.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11681</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11681</guid>
		<description>I liked the comment from Jim Rodgers about being in France in 1807,U.S. in 1907 and China in 2007.It shows how the center of wealth moved from Europe to the U.S. and now to Asia.I suspect that China will have financial setbacks,like the U.S. when it was the leader,but longer term China is where the action will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the comment from Jim Rodgers about being in France in 1807,U.S. in 1907 and China in 2007.It shows how the center of wealth moved from Europe to the U.S. and now to Asia.I suspect that China will have financial setbacks,like the U.S. when it was the leader,but longer term China is where the action will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11679</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11679</guid>
		<description>We only wish we had the ability to do what the Chinese can. They think long term, where we are a must have now society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We only wish we had the ability to do what the Chinese can. They think long term, where we are a must have now society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ventura Leite</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ventura Leite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11678</guid>
		<description>I don´t see reasons for things not developing like  Keith wrote.
When Japan appeared, it caused some imbalances as to US and Europe produtions and exports. Then came China, and I don´t  see reasons for China  not achieve  two and three times Japan GDP, in the future. 
And that impact of China output, plus that of India, Brazil, and others  will deffinitely and deeply shape the world as to investigation , techonological development, the share of(  or fight for )  raw materials, energy sources,  wealth distribution, etc.
I have no doubt China will face some troubles too. But the fact is that  their potential is there and they seem aware of it,  and  they show competence to deal with the magnitude of the challenges.
Besides, it also seems to me that political control of the process is much more  efficient  to their scale than  a plain democracy as we know it in the west.  In terms of foreign policy, they are smart enough for not looking for troubles as the US do, and therefore not creating unnecessary  enemies. Many hate to recognize this, but that  is the way things will go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don´t see reasons for things not developing like  Keith wrote.<br />
When Japan appeared, it caused some imbalances as to US and Europe produtions and exports. Then came China, and I don´t  see reasons for China  not achieve  two and three times Japan GDP, in the future.<br />
And that impact of China output, plus that of India, Brazil, and others  will deffinitely and deeply shape the world as to investigation , techonological development, the share of(  or fight for )  raw materials, energy sources,  wealth distribution, etc.<br />
I have no doubt China will face some troubles too. But the fact is that  their potential is there and they seem aware of it,  and  they show competence to deal with the magnitude of the challenges.<br />
Besides, it also seems to me that political control of the process is much more  efficient  to their scale than  a plain democracy as we know it in the west.  In terms of foreign policy, they are smart enough for not looking for troubles as the US do, and therefore not creating unnecessary  enemies. Many hate to recognize this, but that  is the way things will go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry DiBiaso</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11677</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry DiBiaso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11677</guid>
		<description>Your assessment of China&#039;s long-range planning and foresight is right on target.  It is unfortunate that the US industries have been geared to eating their seed corn while trying to make the next quarter&#039;s bottom line look good.  We have lost much of our research and advanced development capability because of the rather foolish notion the corporations couldn&#039;t afford to keep it up.  Unfortunately we could not afford not to, and now our leadership is steadily losing out.  Lack of long-range planning, and the courage to take the near-term steps to achieve that, have only aided heavily in the losses of our manufacturing capabilities.  Stop the research and advanced development and you have little to manufacture.  Our situation is not all do to cheaper labor overseas; we&#039;ve done a lot of it to ourselves.  We need some major long-range programs; perhaps a NASA-like effort to really rebuild our energy generation and infrastructure for one, where all the energy options are put together in a parallel effort, putting massive number of jobs back into the work force.  We just keep going along letting special interests stop this long-range activity to really happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your assessment of China's long-range planning and foresight is right on target.  It is unfortunate that the US industries have been geared to eating their seed corn while trying to make the next quarter's bottom line look good.  We have lost much of our research and advanced development capability because of the rather foolish notion the corporations couldn't afford to keep it up.  Unfortunately we could not afford not to, and now our leadership is steadily losing out.  Lack of long-range planning, and the courage to take the near-term steps to achieve that, have only aided heavily in the losses of our manufacturing capabilities.  Stop the research and advanced development and you have little to manufacture.  Our situation is not all do to cheaper labor overseas; we've done a lot of it to ourselves.  We need some major long-range programs; perhaps a NASA-like effort to really rebuild our energy generation and infrastructure for one, where all the energy options are put together in a parallel effort, putting massive number of jobs back into the work force.  We just keep going along letting special interests stop this long-range activity to really happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Georgeian</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11673</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Georgeian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11673</guid>
		<description>it is true,china blooming to a degree,with their over pouplation they have importing people from out side china ,my friend kid 25yrs old has visited china for corp duties and learned the mandrin and came back home that he couldn&#039;t find a job ,college grad,he found two offers in china for work ,Amazing at home there is no jobs but abroad there is,I say all power to him leaving his every thing behind and went.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is true,china blooming to a degree,with their over pouplation they have importing people from out side china ,my friend kid 25yrs old has visited china for corp duties and learned the mandrin and came back home that he couldn't find a job ,college grad,he found two offers in china for work ,Amazing at home there is no jobs but abroad there is,I say all power to him leaving his every thing behind and went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave R.</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11671</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11671</guid>
		<description>Your article confirms a [the?] key difference between China and USA is that much of China&#039;s planning is long term whereas much of USA&#039;s planning has been short term for several decades.  The MBA programs of our most highly rated universities have inculcated a short term focus into many of our leaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article confirms a [the?] key difference between China and USA is that much of China's planning is long term whereas much of USA's planning has been short term for several decades.  The MBA programs of our most highly rated universities have inculcated a short term focus into many of our leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOSEPH FOSTER</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11670</link>
		<dc:creator>JOSEPH FOSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11670</guid>
		<description>Good article it may offend Amercians that want to remain in a State of self denial.
The Chinese leadership have sucessfully stripping the west from its Industrial base, and the US perhaps in 30 years will return to an Agriculture based economy.
They should be thanful to the US government for creating an incentive for Amercian Companies to leave the US to elevate profits at the expense of the Amercian middle class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article it may offend Amercians that want to remain in a State of self denial.<br />
The Chinese leadership have sucessfully stripping the west from its Industrial base, and the US perhaps in 30 years will return to an Agriculture based economy.<br />
They should be thanful to the US government for creating an incentive for Amercian Companies to leave the US to elevate profits at the expense of the Amercian middle class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11668</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11668</guid>
		<description>We should be in such rotten shape as China with growth over 10% and billions in reserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should be in such rotten shape as China with growth over 10% and billions in reserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maratha</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11666</link>
		<dc:creator>Maratha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11666</guid>
		<description>China has good long term prospects and no one should short China in the long run.  But, I don&#039;t share the enthusiasm of Keith on China as of now.  There is hot money and bubbles in real estate.  Just today, CNN reported that property prices have gone up by upto 75% in places like Shanghai in just one year... what justified such an increase?

I&#039;m shorting China as of now and will continue to do so till I see that the infrastructure that China has built (and is still building) has effective utilization (not for exports, but for internal consumption by Chinese).

I&#039;ll buy China when HSI hits 15000 or lower...till then, let Keith enjoy his China investments! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has good long term prospects and no one should short China in the long run.  But, I don't share the enthusiasm of Keith on China as of now.  There is hot money and bubbles in real estate.  Just today, CNN reported that property prices have gone up by upto 75% in places like Shanghai in just one year&#8230; what justified such an increase?</p>
<p>I'm shorting China as of now and will continue to do so till I see that the infrastructure that China has built (and is still building) has effective utilization (not for exports, but for internal consumption by Chinese).</p>
<p>I'll buy China when HSI hits 15000 or lower&#8230;till then, let Keith enjoy his China investments! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladtidings</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11665</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladtidings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11665</guid>
		<description>Sensibility never fears sensitivity! Being sensible is better than being sensitive. The American ego (or sensitivity) will do well with a little humbling.. As the saying goes, pride comes before a downfall. China is driven to grow its economy and build up their own country under the concept of &quot;peaceful rise&quot;. No amount of prejudice against it by the western powers will stop it. The world power structure is being rebalanced. This needs a lot of sensibility - meaning we need economic, fiscal and monetary policies that are prudent and certainly not the type which has been driving USA for so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensibility never fears sensitivity! Being sensible is better than being sensitive. The American ego (or sensitivity) will do well with a little humbling.. As the saying goes, pride comes before a downfall. China is driven to grow its economy and build up their own country under the concept of "peaceful rise". No amount of prejudice against it by the western powers will stop it. The world power structure is being rebalanced. This needs a lot of sensibility &#8211; meaning we need economic, fiscal and monetary policies that are prudent and certainly not the type which has been driving USA for so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Gibson</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11664</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11664</guid>
		<description>Spot on. The Chinese have a totally different worldview from Westerners, and most Westerners just don&#039;t get it. For them, the timeline is generations, not weeks or months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on. The Chinese have a totally different worldview from Westerners, and most Westerners just don't get it. For them, the timeline is generations, not weeks or months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy Paul</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11661</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11661</guid>
		<description>China may be a little overvalued at this time but to short would be like shorting the NASDAQ in early 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China may be a little overvalued at this time but to short would be like shorting the NASDAQ in early 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11660</guid>
		<description>At last! Some sensible commentary rather than a load of blather. It doesn&#039;t offend sensibilities, it should be core reading material for anyone wishing to understand the story behind the story. My congratualtions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last! Some sensible commentary rather than a load of blather. It doesn't offend sensibilities, it should be core reading material for anyone wishing to understand the story behind the story. My congratualtions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hari Swaminathan</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/21/investing-in-china-6/comment-page-1/#comment-11659</link>
		<dc:creator>Hari Swaminathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=15734#comment-11659</guid>
		<description>Keith,

You have a vested interest in this commentary as you&#039;ve been blowing the China horn for so long. China is a great story, but there is a bubble there, and just because they #2Ts, it doesnt mean they won&#039;t get hit hard. What happens if during the collateral damage, the USD gets hammered (which it may do so anyway for other reasons), their 2Ts won&#039;t shine so well. The world economy is still structured like a pack of cards, a small crack somewhere and China may discontinue buying US debt, the US Govt will be unable to print money without causing massive inflation which may spiral out of control eventually. At the end of the day, some small unexpected trigger will cause the next global crisis because the root cause problems of the previous crisis have simply been shoved under the carpet, and it will resurface again very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,</p>
<p>You have a vested interest in this commentary as you've been blowing the China horn for so long. China is a great story, but there is a bubble there, and just because they #2Ts, it doesnt mean they won't get hit hard. What happens if during the collateral damage, the USD gets hammered (which it may do so anyway for other reasons), their 2Ts won't shine so well. The world economy is still structured like a pack of cards, a small crack somewhere and China may discontinue buying US debt, the US Govt will be unable to print money without causing massive inflation which may spiral out of control eventually. At the end of the day, some small unexpected trigger will cause the next global crisis because the root cause problems of the previous crisis have simply been shoved under the carpet, and it will resurface again very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

