<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Ways to Profit From Britain&#039;s Surprising Post-Election Rebound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24375</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24375</guid>
		<description>As a Brit living for around 5yrs in the US, and the rest of my life in the UK and Spain, i have to say that i think the writer of this article should have lived where i was in England his view of healthcare for the great british public would i am sure be completely different to that expressed in this article. Having spoken to many people here in the course of my charitable work over the last 5yrs i am now able to make a comparison between how the grassroots of people are treeted when it comes to healthcare in America and i have to say their is no comparison with that of the UK.  The healthcare arrangements in the UK are in my opinion far superior to those with whom i have had contact with here in the US, when it comes to &quot;availability&quot; and also &quot;affordability&quot;. I could give a number of actual comparisons but time for this blog has overtaken me. Sincerely. Pete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Brit living for around 5yrs in the US, and the rest of my life in the UK and Spain, i have to say that i think the writer of this article should have lived where i was in England his view of healthcare for the great british public would i am sure be completely different to that expressed in this article. Having spoken to many people here in the course of my charitable work over the last 5yrs i am now able to make a comparison between how the grassroots of people are treeted when it comes to healthcare in America and i have to say their is no comparison with that of the UK.  The healthcare arrangements in the UK are in my opinion far superior to those with whom i have had contact with here in the US, when it comes to "availability" and also "affordability". I could give a number of actual comparisons but time for this blog has overtaken me. Sincerely. Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROCK</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24339</link>
		<dc:creator>ROCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24339</guid>
		<description>you seems to misunderstand the way of earning money? here it is a matter of days-hours-minutes-seconds and even less!! and big sums-very fast you could have a pile of money-of course hutchinson is right-the problem is, why he tries to learn people like you this???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you seems to misunderstand the way of earning money? here it is a matter of days-hours-minutes-seconds and even less!! and big sums-very fast you could have a pile of money-of course hutchinson is right-the problem is, why he tries to learn people like you this???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Sequeira</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24262</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Sequeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24262</guid>
		<description>I am surprised at the lack of response from the writer/publisher for clarification of

&quot;the knocked down to a P/E ratio of only 4 times 2009 earnings, 6.3 times prospective 2011 earnings and 50% of book value. That’s ridiculous. It’s a screaming “Buy.”&quot;

Does it mean that this cannot be defended i.e. inaccurate?
I would have thought that a swift and robust defence of the friendly challenge I made on 21 July  would have been answered.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised at the lack of response from the writer/publisher for clarification of</p>
<p>"the knocked down to a P/E ratio of only 4 times 2009 earnings, 6.3 times prospective 2011 earnings and 50% of book value. That’s ridiculous. It’s a screaming “Buy.”"</p>
<p>Does it mean that this cannot be defended i.e. inaccurate?<br />
I would have thought that a swift and robust defence of the friendly challenge I made on 21 July  would have been answered.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Wallace</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24216</link>
		<dc:creator>B Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24216</guid>
		<description>Morningstar shows a PE of 63.7 for Rio Tinto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morningstar shows a PE of 63.7 for Rio Tinto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarju Shah</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24181</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarju Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24181</guid>
		<description>These price ratios look like garbage to me, please investigate and correct if necessary:

Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RTP) is a global miner and minerals refiner with substantial promise. Indeed, with the battering that natural-resources stocks have taken in the last few months, RTP has been knocked down to a P/E ratio of only 4 times 2009 earnings, 6.3 times prospective 2011 earnings and 50% of book value. That&#039;s ridiculous. It&#039;s a screaming &quot;Buy.&quot; 


On bloomberg the price to book ratio is 2.21x, and however you measure 2009 earnings the current price is at least 8 times them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These price ratios look like garbage to me, please investigate and correct if necessary:</p>
<p>Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RTP) is a global miner and minerals refiner with substantial promise. Indeed, with the battering that natural-resources stocks have taken in the last few months, RTP has been knocked down to a P/E ratio of only 4 times 2009 earnings, 6.3 times prospective 2011 earnings and 50% of book value. That's ridiculous. It's a screaming "Buy." </p>
<p>On bloomberg the price to book ratio is 2.21x, and however you measure 2009 earnings the current price is at least 8 times them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeem Walayat</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24180</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadeem Walayat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24180</guid>
		<description>7 months ahead of the curve - http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article16167.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7 months ahead of the curve &#8211; http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article16167.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Sequeira</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/07/21/britain/comment-page-1/#comment-24172</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Sequeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=25978#comment-24172</guid>
		<description>I cannot see how the Rio pe ratio of 4 times 2009 earnings have been calculated.  Google finance shows a 0.75 cents as EPS.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot see how the Rio pe ratio of 4 times 2009 earnings have been calculated.  Google finance shows a 0.75 cents as EPS.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

