The (New) Truth About Oil

Email

Traditionally, demand levels would determine the overall condition of the oil market. Supply (and the investment required for that supply) would be based upon what demand told us.

Actually, oil never reflected the demand-supply relationship as well as other sectors of the market. Oil has an irritating habit of not reflecting what it should in the dynamics of market play. Until recently, petroleum economists would comment (or lament) about the demand inelasticity of oil. That means, due to the lack of available alternatives (especially in transportation), demand for oil products would not decline as the price rose.

Such a relationship has certainly been tested over the last several years. The New York market price for West Texas Intermediate benchmark crude (WTI) moved from a $147.27-per-barrel high in July of 2008 to below $33 by the end of that year, only to rise again to almost $114 by the end of April of this year. It's moved back down to the $85-$90 range since then.

We did witness some demand destruction in the summer of 2008, and then (to a much lesser extent) in the spring of this year, with the rise of prices at the pump to well over $4 a gallon.

Yet what must be remembered is the simple fact that developed countries no longer call the shots in oil demand.

This is now – officially – a global market.

On the production side, of course, it has been a global market for more than 50 years. The primary reserves are located in the Middle East, the former Soviet Union and offshore in places stretching from Vietnam and Australia to the Arctic basin. The supply side, therefore, has been global for some time.

But now the demand component also is global in scope. This changes everything, as you'll see. And there's even a way to track this new (and more accurate) demand for oil.

Three "Crude" Shifts

By fixating on U.S. demand, analysts exhibit an out-of-date tendency. The description of the American market as "having less than 5% of the world's population yet consuming 25% of the world's energy" no longer has the impact it once did.

Yes, the United States remains one of the two largest end users internationally (the other being China). But the spike in demand now is coming from developing parts of the world. As demand figures move laterally in North America and Western Europe, they are accelerating elsewhere.

Three elements are leading to this rise.

  1. The industrial and production advances in China and India, along with the East Asian recovery and the more recent moves in Indonesia, have resulted in substantial increases in energy demand. That translates primarily into an increase in the need for oil.
  2. Members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and main non-OPEC producers like Russia have been withholding more of their crude from the global market to advance their own refining and petrochemical sector. The move is not simply to supply rising domestic demand, but also to provide a larger value-added oil product export stream to improve return.
  3. Regions usually ignored by analysts are registering accelerating demand. One of the most pronounced is West Africa.

Nigeria is certainly a major international oil producer (and one of the last sources for prized light sweet crude, which requires less processing). However, the country has insufficient refinery capacity, resulting in most of the crude being exported.

On the other hand, Nigeria produces only about 15% of the electricity it needs daily. That means 85% of the power comes from private generators. Those generators run on diesel. And the vast majority of that diesel must be imported.

Similar trade cycles are emerging in other areas of Asia and Africa. They are likely to become more pronounced.

The combination of these three factors completely overwhelms any sluggishness in U.S. demand figures. This offset is continuing.

So what does this tell us about the overall picture?

Demand Is Hitting An All-Time Record

Global demand will come in this year at an average 88.2 million barrels per day, an all-time record. That level will extend to 89.4 million barrels per day by mid-2012.

Yet, the headlines today speak of OPEC decreasing demand forecasts. The OPEC projection had been at 88.7 million barrels for this year. That higher figure, however, had been more political than anything else. It was advanced before the last OPEC meeting, in which Saudi Arabia failed to entice a production increase.

That was followed by Riyadh unilaterally increasing production some 500,000 to 700,000 barrels per day (nicely matching the difference between the two estimates, by the way) along with the poorly-conceived International Energy Agency (IEA)/U.S. move to release 60 million barrels from strategic reserves (half of that U.S.).

The reserve release accounted for only 18 hours of international demand.

It was never a factor.

The important point to remember is this: The global demand rise between June and the end of the year is poised to absorb all of the additional Saudi volume… and would have swallowed up continued IEA monthly releases as well.

The demand picture has not changed. In fact, as the market has revealed a number of times before, any short-term reductions in the price will merely result in an additionalencouragement to demand.

The global picture is one of the primary reasons why Brent, the London benchmark used more often to determine prices in other regions, has a price more than $20-a-barrel higher than WTI traded in New York. That has been the case now for a year, despite WTI being a slightly better grade of oil than Brent.

The vast majority of oil traded on a daily basis globally is inferior in quality to both of these benchmarks. But Brent is employed more as the standard against which oil is bought and sold at discount.

You can track the price of Brent right here. There's an ETF that tracks it, too – the United States Brent Oil Fund (NYSE: BNO).

Keep an eye on it, because it will tell you what is really happening worldwide.

News and Related Story Links:

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

About the Author

Dr. Kent Moors is an internationally recognized expert in oil and natural gas policy, risk assessment, and emerging market economic development. He serves as an advisor to many U.S. governors and foreign governments. Kent details his latest global travels in his free Oil & Energy Investor e-letter. He makes specific investment recommendations in his newsletter, the Energy Advantage. For more active investors, he issues shorter-term trades in his Energy Inner Circle

Read full bio

  1. Zahir | August 18, 2011

    Oil

  2. Zahir | August 18, 2011

    Excellent article

  3. clarence swinney | August 18, 2011

    BURN BABY BURN
    INEQUALITY IS FUEL
    SPARK IS REMOVAL OF SAFETY NETS

    5% own 62% all Net Wealth
    80% own 15% 120,000,00 workers (62/15)

    2% own 50% all Financial Wealth
    20% own 93%
    80% 120,000,000 workers own 7% (93/7)

    25% take 67% all individual income
    80% 70,000,000 workers take 13% (67/13)

    10 Banks own 80% all deposits in 7600 Banks
    10 firms own military industrial
    10 firms own pharmaceutical industry
    10 firms own many of our industries—buy/sell/ship overseas by Wall Street

    DEMOCRACY NOW A CORPOCRACY

  4. sean edwards | August 18, 2011

    So does this mean I SHOULD NOT buy all this hyped up NG gas stock that's supposed to gain 11,000% in 13 months? Im about to subscribe to get those stock names and take a loan out just to buy this NG stock because im sick of being poor. And in doing so between the subscription and loan ill be putting myself in a horrible spot for quite some time!!!!!! I need honest insight here.

    • playablanca_panama@yahoo.com | August 21, 2011

      watch the contango and backwardization. Almost impossible to profit

      I learned the hard way

      Mary

  5. john r ridings | August 18, 2011

    I am British, and read your comments avidly. However, I am confused about the recent S&P downgrade in the USA, as some say it is ill advised, whereas others say it is not enough ! Is the mighty dollar about to go bust ? If you, the American people are truly consuming about 5 times as much oil per capita, than everyone else in the world, then the time of reckoning must be approaching. It must come as no surprise that the crude oil producers will now invest in refining their oil, and selling the improved product to the worlds consumers. The same is true for every other product ie coffee, wheat, minerals etc. So, what to do ? Historically the US just went to war, and took the unrefined products, but that is becoming less of an option. I look forward to seeing what transpires.

    • Clark Benson | August 20, 2011

      Re: John Ridings

      "Historically the US just went to war, and took the unrefined products…" Really? Typical comment of a pompous limey. What "unrefined products" did the US receive from WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, IraqI, Afghanistan, IraqII even – who has the oil leases there? Are you seriously one of those idiots that believe the nefarious CIA extracts the oil from the downtrodden poor of the world? How about we delve into the history of the British Empire and their removal of "unrefined products" from their overseas colonies – India, Malaysia, Arabia, etc., etc., etc.

  6. GEORGE KINKADE | August 19, 2011

    If we could only get more of this type info into the public conversation, we might be better served.

  7. Joseph Cardona | August 19, 2011

    A very thorough review of the global oil situation with unexpected comments. Prices should be tied to demand-supply outlook. I think alternative energy sources are not that reliable as are natural resources. This axiom boosts to make oil a precious energy source. Highly industrialised countries have still to rely on the use of oil and, consequently, resort to buying this commodity in bulk. Petroleum products make up an intrinsic part of the world's money markets, and, as in the case of other commodities, the psychological effect impacts on prices.

  8. william alford | August 19, 2011

    I read this and I do not agree. First of all, I have traveled some myself (41 different countries) This travel took me to different continents, Africa, Asia, Middle East and Europe. I've witnessed personally the life styles in these places and they don't come close to the lifestyle of America. There are major differences that nobody seems to want to bring to the forefront. Such as, Government,Culture and Infastructure!!,
    Most of asian and African countries are ruled by dictatorships or totalitarian governments. These are countries where the populations have no say in government.
    America , on the other hand is supposed to be a republic founded by the people and for the people with our decisions of leadership designated by and ELECTED by the people.
    You say Global, my ass it'ts nothing but criminals pulling the strings in the USA any more. High standards and high principles have gone the way of the wicked.
    We need to clean house and get rid of the crooks who are meddling with our freedom and our right to live as free men.
    I,ve always stood by capitalism but when the deck is stacked the players who want in are automatically eliminated.

  9. playablanca_panama@yahoo.com | August 21, 2011

    OK So I went through the literature trying to find an ETF that tracked the price of Oil and was disappointed that there was not one that tracked the Spot price, as the contango and backwardization of all the futures trades meant that no matter what you did the Oil ETFs were guaranteed to lose you money

    So is the BNO tracking the spot price That would be so nice Donèt worry I will go and find out.

    Is this a recommendation
    (sorry my computers keys are glitched and my punctuation is all messed up so I can not show the question marks etc.)

    Mary

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


nine + 9 =

Some HTML is OK