I'm talking about the student loan bubble.
Recently, the outstanding volume of student loans passed $1 trillion. What's more bothersome is that the average individual amount owed by new college graduates has passed $25,000.
With college costs zooming upwards faster than inflation, this is rapidly becoming another subprime mortgage-like sinkhole.
Just like subprime, the problem is that people of modest means are being suckered by high-pressure salesmen into taking on too much debt.
The difference is that since student loans are government guaranteed and can't be released in bankruptcy, the burdens will be paid by the unfortunate ex-students and the U.S. taxpayer.
The standard justification for soaring higher education costs is a simple one.
The United States needs to maintain an educational lead in order for its wage levels to remain above those of its competitors.
I'm talking largely about emerging markets, which have been helped enormously by modern communications, making global sourcing much easier than it was.
There are two problems with this view.
In what way is the U.S. being made more competitive by graduating students in (insert your favorite useless college major here)?
Second, even as the demand for a college education is increasing, the efficiency of providing it is declining. Both the Ivy League and state university systems increase tuition rates far more rapidly than overall inflation.
The Student Loan Bubble Drives Up CostsIn fact, there is considerable evidence that finance availability is itself pushing up college costs.
As college funding has become more readily available to the general population, it has reduced the financial pressure on colleges, since few of their students are today paying their way from part-time jobs and parent cash flow.
Huge endowments in the Ivy League, which allow those elite colleges to provide full scholarships for students, focus the competition between colleges ever more closely on league table "prestige" rather than costs.
The ranks of college administrators have also exploded since they are effectively insulated from market forces - not unlike those in medical professions.
So have their earnings - according to The New York Times, in the decade between the 1999-2000 and 2009-10 college years, the average college president's pay at the 50 wealthiest universities increased by 75%, to $876,792, while their average professorial pay increased by only 14%, to $179,970.
Meanwhile, the cost of tuition has increased by 65% while prices generally rose by 31% during the same decade.
That's precisely the opposite of what you'd want to happen, if you were concerned about college productivity and cost.
Buried in Debt by Student LoansThere are two factors pushing the escalation in student loan volume.
One is the nationalization of most student loan programs in 2009, providing government guarantees on most student loans.
That has altogether removed the risks of student loan provision from banks, as well as encouraging low-quality degree scams by for-profit colleges. For-profit colleges are a good idea, but not when combined with government-guaranteed student loans.
The other factor pushing up student loans is the Bankruptcy Act of 2005, which allowed consumers to relieve themselves of all debts in bankruptcy except student loans.
This special privilege for the student loan market has caused great hardship.
The Washington Post reported this week that Americans 60 and older still owe $36 billion on student loans, and gave one sad example of a 58-year old woman who had borrowed $21,000 to fund a graduate degree in clinical psychology in the late 1980s (which one would think was at least moderately useful), had never been able to earn more than $25,000 per annum and was now left with student loan debt of $54,000.
If government guarantees and bankruptcy exemption remain in place, the volume of student loans will continue soaring, as unscrupulous lenders provide them to naive students.
That will cause the cost of college to continue rising in real terms as college administrators pad their sinecures.
As with the subprime mortgage industry, an eventual crash is inevitable. But unlike subprime mortgage borrowers, student loan borrowers will be unable to start afresh after bankruptcy.
The solution is to eliminate the two unwarranted subsidies to the student loan industry. Student loans must no longer be guaranteed by the government.
And in bankruptcy, they must be treated like any other debt. The banks will scream, and student loans will be much more difficult to get.
For most students, that will return them to choosing a cheaper institution and working their way through college, in the traditional way - some of them might choose more marketable degree courses, too.
For the poor but brilliant, the Ivy League can continue providing full scholarships and the government can continue providing Pell grants - with their cost fully accounted for on-budget.
College costs will drop back to 1970s levels in real terms, as overstuffed bureaucracies are eliminated.
And for college administrators and student lending banks, life will get considerably harder - which is no bad thing.
All bubbles eventually burst. This one will be no different.
Related Articles and News:
Physical Gold and Silver Dividends Offer Investors the Best of Both Worlds
How to Win Bernanke's War on Savers with a 19% Yield
The Madness of Crowds: How to Play Bonds, China, and Gold in 2012
Why I'm Taking Gold Double-Eagles on My Next Trip to Utah