Why Ben Bernanke Could Learn a Thing or Two From Mark Carney

Email

Now that President Barack Obama has been reelected, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's easy money policies may well be with us for the next four years.

And even if Obama replaces Bernanke when his term ends in January 2014, he's likely to choose another soft-money acolyte like Fed Vice-chairman Janet Yellen to lead the Fed.

For believers in sound money like me, that's something of a gloomy prospect.

As for the rest of the world, the prospects for higher interest rates don't look too good, either.

However, on Monday I did catch a glimmer of light when it was announced the Bank of England's new Governor is going to be Mark Carney, the former head of the Bank of Canada.

Now I'll be the first to admit that, at first glance, Carney doesn't look too promising.

He did, after all, spend 13 years at Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS). And we all know the track record of Goldman Sachs has been nothing short of appalling.

The bank itself made a bundle by shorting the housing market on the way down and persuaded its alumnus Hank Paulson to bail out its dodgy AIG credit default swaps with $13 billion of taxpayer money.

However, the truth is Carney has been out of Goldman since 2004, and his track record at the Bank of Canada has been very good indeed.

To Carney's credit, he didn't cut interest rates as far as the Fed and has actually raised them part of the way back. What's more, Carney only did $20 billion of "quantitative easing" bond purchases in 2009, at the height of the crisis, and has since sold the extra bonds back to the market.

In the aftermath, Canada's economy has notably outperformed the U.S. economy over the last five years, and continues to do so even though house prices there are currently looking wobbly.

Ben Bernanke could learn a thing or two here.

A Shrewd Central Banker

At the Bank of Canada, Carney has not been responsible for detailed bank regulation, but there's a considerable "nod and a wink" responsibility for the Canadian banking system, which was notably free of the 2008 disasters that afflicted U.S. banks.

Indeed, the Canadian banking system remains much less likely than the U.S. system to take the global economy down with it, since the largest Canadian bank, Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE: RY) has only $757 billion in assets. Compare that with JP Morgan Chase's (NYSE: JPM) $2.3 trillion.

Carney should thus be an improvement on other current central bankers in two respects; he will keep the banking system better under control, and he will follow a less extreme monetary policy.

Current Bank of England Governor Mervyn King has been worse than Bernanke in some respects, funding almost the entire British government's borrowing requirement, even though British inflation has touched 5% and even at today's 2.7% is well above the Bank's nominal target.

For Americans, this may not seem to matter.

After all, Britain's economy is not much bigger than Canada's and only one-sixth the size of the U.S. economic behemoth. As investors, most of us probably have more investments in Canada, which has a very interesting range of mining and energy companies, than we do in the slow-growth economy of Britain.

The difference is not in the pink knee-breeches worn by the Bank of England's doormen, but in the City of London, which remains on some measures the world's largest financial center.

When the world's central bankers meet, the Bank of England Governor is given a place at the top table, along with the President of the European Central Bank and Ben Bernanke.

Is There A Reality Check Ahead?

That gives Carney an outsize influence in his new job.

When Ben Bernanke and Mario Draghi begin to rave about all the exciting bond purchase programs they are inventing, he can remind them of their dangers, and suggest that interest rates above the level of inflation will work better to preserve economic stability.

And when the big banks explain that their new derivatives businesses require them to leverage 1000-to-1 and park the proceeds in the Cayman Islands, he can explain from his Goldman Sachs experience why that isn't a good idea.

At the same time, he can bash any feeble EU attempts to drive the City of London's business to Frankfurt by pointing out that the German banks haven't been so frightfully well managed, either.

So will Bernanke put his head in his hands when confronted by Carney and moan "Oh my God, this has all been a ghastly mistake!" Probably not, but a little injection of reality can't do his policy any harm.

And if even a little of Carney's prudence rubs off on his central banking colleagues (yes, that includes you, Mr. Zero-interest-rate Masaaki Shirakawa, governor of the Bank of Japan) , we should get a modest slowdown in the global tide of funny money – which will benefit us all.

Related Story Links:

Money Morning:
Prepare Your Portfolio with These Rock-Solid Dividend Payers

Money Morning:
Six Dividend Stocks to Hold Forever
Money Morning:
How to Boost Your Income When a Six Figure Salary No Longer Cuts It
Money Morning:
Election 2012 Means the Real Bernanke Bombshells Won't Fall Until December

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

  1. Kevin Beck | November 30, 2012

    Too bad that Helicopter Ben thinks he has all the answers.

    This is why he will NEVER listen to what any of his colleagues point out are flaws with his way of thinking. And besides, Benny doesn't give a damn about economic growth; all he cares about is the growth of big-bank balance sheets.

    And why not? When those grow, they're just following in Benny's footsteps.

  2. Jeff Pluim | November 30, 2012

    Good article, but the Royal Bank of Canada is not the largest bank in Canada. That honor goes to the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. I believe that the Royal Bank ranks either 3rd or 4th in size.

    • R.L.MTL@HOTMAIL.COM | December 2, 2012

      The Royal Bank of Canada is the largest with $ 751.7 in assets.
      The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC), is only the 5th, with $ 353.7 in assets.

    • Rusty Brown | December 31, 2012

      Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. There is no "The" there, same as with General Motors and Google. No "The".

  3. fallingman | November 30, 2012

    Nice article. Thanks for telling the unvarnished truth about Goldman.

    I guess the question I have is this. The BOE is a different situation. Canada's in passably good shape. Britain is not. Does Carney change the BOE or do the exigencies of the British situation force Carney to ease alongside his central bank colleagues? If he holds the line while others ease, that'll put the BOE behind in the currency depreciation race.

    And if he doesn't inflate, who exactly is gonna be buying the bonds necessary to fund the British government? Maybe I'm missing something, but aren't they pretty much where we are, with so few "natural" buyers that the central bank practically has to step in and buy in size or else rates will rise to where they actually provide a positive real return? Ooooh, couldn't have that. They might have to actually spend less.

  4. Bob Hamrick | December 6, 2012

    Except for the fact that he is deceased, Art Carney would have been even better. As the indefatigable Ed Norton, the sewer worker on "The Honeymooners", he was comfortable with making a living off sewage and sewer rats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Some HTML is OK