As a Money Morning Member, you'll get our top financial news stories delivered straight to your inbox – every weekday morning.
Cancel at any time | How it works
Welcome to Money Morning - Only the News You Can Profit From.
Private Briefingwith WILLIAM PATALON III, Executive Editor
Not a member yet? Right now you can get immediate access to Money Morning’s Private Briefing for only $7.99. Click here to get started now.
Click here to get immediate access - for only $7.99.
Members log in:
Not a member yet? Sign up here or learn more.
Chief Investment Strategist
20-year seasoned market analyst and professional trader with highly accurate track record. Specialty in Asian markets.
Global Energy Strategist
35-year expert in oil and gas policy, risk assessment, and emerging market economic development.
Capital Wave Strategist
30-year CBOE trader, market maker, and retired hedge fund honcho. Helped launch the Volatility Index in 1993.
20-year commodity guru and portfolio advisor. Top authority on metals + mining stocks. Head- quartered in Canada.
Defense + Tech Specialist
30-year veteran of tech markets with a Rolodex of Silicon Valley CEOs. Pulitzer nominee. Uncovered rare earths crisis.
30-year veteran analyst of business, economics, and financial markets. Award-winning author of "Contrarian Investing."
While some "liberal pundits" have suggested the United States set 2013 tax rates for the rich back to the high rates of the 1950s, renowned economist Peter Schiff says that would simply result in the rich paying less than they do now.
Such prominent figures as investing guru Warren Buffett and The New York Times columnist Paul Krugman recently have made the argument that since the U.S. economy of the 1950s was booming despite high tax rates on the rich, tackling the fiscal cliff by raising taxes on the wealthy in 2013 should do no harm - and could actually help the economy.
Schiff, the CEO and chief global strategist of Euro Pacific Capital, says those who think we should adopt anything like the high 1950s-style tax rates - the top marginal rate was 91%, nearly triple today's 35% - haven't studied the whole picture.
"There's a myth out there propagated by people like Warren Buffett that the rich used to pay much higher rates of tax than they do today. The truth is the opposite," Schiff said Friday in a Daily Ticker video interview.
Schiff, who is best known for predicting the collapse of the housing bubble and the 2008 financial crisis in his 2007 book "Crash Proof," explained that differences in the tax code from the 1950s reach far beyond just the tax rates.
"Back in the 1950s there was only one kind of income; now there's three," Schiff said, noting that today income earned from work is treated differently than capital gains from stocks or passive income such as dividends.
"Back then income was income. You could deduct losses in one category from gains in another category. Today you cannot do that," Schiff said.
The rich were familiar with, and made use of, a wide variety of tax shelters in that era - many of which were eliminated in the 1980s.
As a result, the wealthy of the 1950s were not paying at the levels suggested by the stratospheric tax rates of the era, Schiff said.
The remaining content is exclusively for Money Morning subscribers. To gain access, enter your email address: