its a brave step, the healthcare program, but i keep asking myself "what is wrong with everyonne paying for their own healthcare"? Seems to me in the ennd it will bring health care down for us all.

This was told before the horrible bill was out. Those stuck on MSNBC, CNN MSM and the Huffington post aren't getting the real news. They are outlets with a Liberal agenda.

Thomas Linzey, an environmental lawyer from Pennsylvania, has said that the U.S. Constitution protects private property and commerce more than the rights of individuals, communities and the earth; this is true, as since Marbury vs. Madison (1808) which established the judicial intent of the Constitutional Convention (1787) that the judicial branch would, in fact, be the legal arbitrator of last resort, the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld these dual precepts of economy more than any other single pretext.

The "sanctity" of both private commerce and property codified in the Constitution was given no greater context than with the unanimous decision of the John Marshal Court in the celebrated Johnson vs. MacIntosh (1823) case. Here, the Court flatly claimed the extinguishment of Indian title – the "right" of property – by "right" of conquest, whether violent (i.e., the killing of people and seizure of their property) or not. The only difference, the Court said, between pre-1823 acts and post-1823 acts of extinguishment would be that such seizure(s) would now have to be "with due process;" no matter if such due process was accomplished without just compensation or through extra-legal (illegal) acts, as actually occurred, and continues to occur, today.

So it can be said with legal certainty that the property presumed as private and the "inherent rights" thereof as afforded in the Constitution are, in fact, bourne on the backs of blood and thievery and stealth and lie, as well as, in some instances, legitimate purchase.

Through a series of decisions beginning in 1819 and thereafter the Supreme Court has upheld the rights of corporations to act as individuals (corporate personhood), which of course, codifies the rights of private commerce OVER living individuals, let alone the communities we all live in, and of course, the planet earth we all live among and upon. Hence it is a misnomer and dishonest to say that "Obamacare" is the creation of a President and his political party because, despite disagreements, the details argued back and forth between the partisan parties represented the nuances of corporate power OVER government intrusion on that power, the government in this instance representing the entirety of the population of the United Stats through the payment of taxes.

Since that Government is, in effect, controlled by the corporate entities as have been defined since 1819 to today, in the 21st Century the corporate control of government is all-consuming, e.g., profit over all, which is amoral in character, since by codifying violent conquest into Federal law as was done in 1823 the extent of limitations of that policy were meant to be within the exterior boundaries of the United States, which meant that OUTSIDE those exterior boundaries, violent conquest to extinguish title of non-U.S. held-lands was, in the eyes of Constitutional law, still legal and justifiable.

Since corporate power (private commerce) and the pursuit of profit over all is the prevailing legal tenet of the Constitution, virtually all of the supposed "lies" in Obamacare were constructed by a fight between two partisan political parties representing the same interests, and therefore have no relevance to the real issue of the rights of human beings to have a health care infrastructure, including an emphasis and maintenance and prevention rather than refinements of technology and invention of artificial chemicals that are toxic rather than curative, that serves living persons rather than non-living corporations.

Beginning with the actual U.S. Military Budget of $1.2 Trillion dollars annually, the vast majority of these expenses, beginning with the Pentagon's consumption of fossil fuels (the world's largest single consumer of such fuels) are, in fact, government subsidies to corporations. "BIG" Government is due to the "guaranteed" (locked-in) shareholder profits provided to "BIG" corporations provided by both partisan parties through their votes on both legislation and appropriations.

Least the intent of this argument be lost on those who think that what is being said here is "liberal" or anti-capitalist or even Marxist (it is not), in an era of human-caused climate change that is irrefutable, local and regional entrepreneurship understood in the context of the finite limits to growth due to both population and a diminution of resources means that a 180 degree turn in perceptions and acceptance of these realities toward conservation and renewable are absolutely essential if our species is going to survive through the 21st Century and beyond. While the prevailing view of this and other similar websites are still "lost in the clouds of immediate gratifications and fantasies of technological colonialization" say, of the Moon and nearby planets, those days are over.

Investors who are savvy to local and regional opportunities and the collaboration with investors in other locales and regions to make a deliberate choice to work toward a resolution of these complexities of the modern age at the regional and local level and not listen to the voice of greed of globalization can still reap financial rewards knowing that if we collectively don't, we do so at our species' peril.

Here is a FACT:  As demand increases, if supply remains level, prices go up.  If demand increases and supply decreases, prices go up more.  This is the law of supply and demand.

You can thank the GOP for most of the provisions which result in the right wing calling it 'Obamacare lies.'

They’re still lying about ObamaCare.