Five Reasons Why Natural Gas Prices Will Continue to Rise

Email

Not long ago, the market was laboring under expectations that the NYMEX futures contract for natural gas would remain at around $3 per 1,000 cubic feet (or million BTUs).

The pundits were proclaiming that a surplus of shale gas, over production, and historic storage surpluses translated into long-term discounts in natural gas prices.

Last year's historically warm winter over much of the U.S. had not helped the price either.

While this year the weather is more seasonal, there are other factors in the price rise. For the investor this means there will be plays developing in specific areas that were simply nonexistent six months ago.

Make no mistake, we are not about to go back up to the $12 plus levels experienced a few years ago. Those days may be gone forever – one of the tangible impacts of the unconventional gas revolution (shale, tight, coal bed methane). There will still be volatility in this sector as the ongoing balance between extraction potential and well counts works itself out.

But we are likely to move into a manageable pricing dynamic.

And that means for investing in gas – with apologies to Sherlock Holmes – the game's afoot!

A Change in Drivers for Natural Gas Prices

Natural gas prices used to be largely about how cold winters were and how hot summers were.

Heating needs were the driver in the first case, electricity generation for air conditioning determining the second.

These still exist, but today there are other determining factors.

The environment in which they operate has changed dramatically. Given the known extractable reserves currently available in the U.S. market, it would be possible to increase overall gas production 25% a year for the foreseeable future.

Nobody is about to do that, of course.

It would destroy the market and most of the companies working in it. But that amount of available volume eliminates a concern on the supply side. In fact, it will serve to moderate and put some downward pressure on pricing whether or not it is extracted.

The key is on the demand side.

Here, several factors are emerging to portend higher prices. Once again, we need to keep this in perspective. My estimate remains for an average price of about $4.35 come high summer, absent any unforeseen developments, with an increase to $4.85 to $5.15 by the end of 2014.

Not a major advance, but enough to kick start an entire sector.

Why?

Because of five underlying reasons, all of which I have discussed in previous issues of Oil & Energy Investor. Each has been enhanced by the period of reduced prices since lower prices will always encourage greater energy use. As the reliance increases with the usage levels, so will the commodity price.

Five Factors to Consider in Natural Gas Prices

First, broad based industrial use has finally returned and exceeded pre-crisis levels. This is always the last of the main traditional demand areas to return after a recession (and the most recent was the worst in seventy years).

Second, natural gas is replacing oil as a feeder stock for petrochemicals – everything from ingredients used in the production of plastics to fertilizers and widely used chemicals. This flow is actually increasing quicker than I had initially anticipated.

Third, we continue to witness a move to liquefied natural gas (LNG) and compressed natural gas (CNG) as a vehicle fuel. The transition remains primarily noticeable in higher end trucks, with the emphasis on passenger vehicles still awaiting cost reductions. Nonetheless, heavy truck, bus and equipment fleets are moving to natural gas.

However, it is the last two categories that are the main stimuli.

Fourth is the move from coal to gas for the production of electricity, a development occurring more rapidly than even the rather optimistic predictions I made last year.

The background is this.

The U.S. will retire at least 90 GW of capacity by 2020, with an additional 20-30 GW likely from the imposition of EPA non carbon emission standards (mercury, sulfurous and nitrous oxides). Most of this capacity is currently fueled by coal.

Last year, I estimated that for each 10 GW transferred, 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day would be required. Well, based on the initial figures, it's actually coming in at 1.2 billion. It sets up this startling conclusion. If half of the transition I expect from coal to gas actually takes place, it will eat up three times the current volume in storage.

Certainly, some of that will be offset by increasing production. But the operators have learned that flooding the market does not help any of them. That is another lesson taught by the shale gas age.

Finally, we have the advent of LNG exports from the U.S. and Canada. These are not likely to begin in earnest until late 2014, but will transform the sector. From providing none of the current global LNG trade, the U.S. will account for at least 9% within ten years.

For those concerned about what the exports will do to domestic end user costs, remember there is plenty of spare volume capacity waiting to be drilled. In short, this is not going to be an increase in exports at the expense of rising costs at home. There is plenty to satisfy both.

Once again, the key here is balancing production. As we move into this new gas age, remember this: LNG exports will act as a primary outlet for excess shale gas extraction. The greater the exports, the lower will be the volatility in pricing at home.

We are, therefore, watching a number of new investment opportunities emerging as the gas market shakes itself out. This is not a tide, but more like a series of escalating ripples, and it is not going to raise all boats.

How should the individual investor play this?

That will be the subject of my next article. So stay tuned.

[Editor's Note: Dr. Kent Moors is one of the most renowned and most connected oil and energy experts in the world. His Energy Inner Circle is an invitation into his private world of high-level energy contacts, where he recommends companies most likely to be impacted ahead of the seismic changes within the energy sector.

And now for a limited time, you can get immediate full access to The Energy Inner Circle model portfolio for just $99. But that's only a small part of this story. The same deal includes a "test drive" all of our premium services but one. That's $27,500 in research, for just $99! You can go here for the details]

Related Articles and News:

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

About the Author

Dr. Kent Moors is an internationally recognized expert in oil and natural gas policy, risk assessment, and emerging market economic development. He serves as an advisor to many U.S. governors and foreign governments. Kent details his latest global travels in his free Oil & Energy Investor e-letter. He makes specific investment recommendations in his newsletter, the Energy Advantage. For more active investors, he issues shorter-term trades in his Energy Inner Circle

Read full bio

  1. td sellers | March 17, 2013

    I only count four factors as LNG is mentioned twice. Did I miss something here??

  2. katherine brand | March 17, 2013

    Dear Dr. Moor- I have a small interest in 6 gas wells in Johnson County, Texas leased to XTO Energy. About three years ago we had to go to court to get our money out of receivership. When we do get a check I look at breakdown of each well. They list wells backdated where they pay a certain amount then the next line they take it back. Looks like money laundering. I. asked them why they do this and they (XTO) and was told they are adjusting the well. I know I'm just a country girl but since this is new to me and we had to go to court to get things rolling, I don't trust them. I have see a well go from 4..35 down to 1.92. I hope someone could tell me what the hell is going on. Thank you

  3. Charlie Schlott | March 17, 2013

    My latest analysis shows that the weather will remain unseasonaly cold for the mid Atlantic and New England states through 31 March…Out west mild conditions will prevail..This should enhance your thoughts on energy levals…

  4. Bob Cook | March 17, 2013

    I hope you are right!

  5. Ron Wagner | March 17, 2013

    Coal caps the price of natural gas, at least for now. EPA requirements may eventually raise that cap, but I think your $4.35
    figure is a good estimate. Thanks for your article. I have 5,600
    selected natural gas story links on my blog.
    Ron Wagner

  6. anders wijkman | May 26, 2013

    Most valuable analysis. Many thanks.
    Anders Wijkman

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


− 1 = three

Some HTML is OK

© 2014 Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201, Email: customerservice@MoneyMorning.com