<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Money Morning &#187; 401(k)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/401k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Global Investment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Retirement Concerns Plague U.S. Baby Boomers</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2011/03/16/retirement-concerns-plague-u-s-baby-boomers/</link>
		<comments>http://moneymorning.com/2011/03/16/retirement-concerns-plague-u-s-baby-boomers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerri Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baby Boomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=40132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retirement used to be synonymous with leisure and travel.  Americans believed that decades of hard work and thriftiness would make for a  prosperous and successful life they could enjoy after their jobs - the  "American Dream." <br /><br />
Now retirement doesn't evoke the same sense of tranquility  for most U.S. workers. Instead, economic anxiety has taken its toll.<br /><br />
Americans used to ride a "<a target="_blank" href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/__Story_Inserts/graphics/__PDF/retirement_final_report.pdf">three-lane  highway</a>" into retirement: a traditional pension, Social Security, and individual  savings plans, like 401(k)s. <br /><br />
But the recent economic downturn packed a devastating punch  to many 401(k) accounts, U.S. households have dipped into savings to make ends  meet, and debt-laden federal, state and local governments will have trouble meeting  pension and Social Security obligations. <br /><br />

As the first of the 78 million U.S. Baby Boomers start to  retire, most of them worry they don't have enough retirement savings to support  them in their post-work years. <br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
					<div id="cfct-build-40132" class="cfct-build">
						
				<div id="cfct-row-cbf9b59e34dd5b611075fc2b626c5f40" class="cfct-row cfct-row-abc">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-f1c0c61cf66f249168aebc54342f85fe" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html ">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content">
Retirement used to be synonymous with leisure and travel.  Americans believed that decades of hard work and thriftiness would make for a  prosperous and successful life they could enjoy after their jobs - the  "American Dream." <br /><br />
Now retirement doesn't evoke the same sense of tranquility  for most U.S. workers. Instead, economic anxiety has taken its toll.<br /><br />
Americans used to ride a "<a target="_blank" href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/__Story_Inserts/graphics/__PDF/retirement_final_report.pdf" rel="external nofollow">three-lane  highway</a>" into retirement: a traditional pension, Social Security, and individual  savings plans, like 401(k)s. <br /><br />
But the recent economic downturn packed a devastating punch  to many 401(k) accounts, U.S. households have dipped into savings to make ends  meet, and debt-laden federal, state and local governments will have trouble meeting  pension and Social Security obligations. <br /><br />

As the first of the 78 million U.S. Baby Boomers start to  retire, most of them worry they don't have enough retirement savings to support  them in their post-work years. <br /><br /></div>
			</div></div></div>
				</div>
				<div id="cfct-row-fb8c488778e8d9d1b7156e8e8b9812d3" class="cfct-row cfct-row-abc">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-fc16887b1d558432e2e81b6221ad6275" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module mm-toolbar-module ">
				
			</div></div></div>
				</div><div id="cfct-row-1269fe578c2eb8da6f6e6de1693b28cc" class="cfct-row cfct-row-float-c"><div id="cfct-block-d9aaf2d1e9ad9cfb259276ec7af37772" class="cfct-block cfct-block-float-c">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-widget-module-cfox_preload ">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content"><div id="cfox_preload-cfct-module-7218766d4dad05a71b87b42634dd4b07" class="widget cfox_preload">			<div class="cfox_preload_widget">
							</div>
			</div></div>
			</div></div><div id="cfct-block-17ea5d0e64193cbc3aa59c2d3f9def77" class="cfct-block cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html ">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content">A <a target="_blank" href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/__Story_Inserts/graphics/__PDF/retirement_final_report.pdf" rel="external nofollow">nationwide  public opinion research study released last week</a> by the National Institute  of Retirement Security found that 54% of those polled are very concerned about  the effect of economic conditions on their ability to have a secure retirement.  About 78% felt the average worker was unable to save enough on his or her own  to guarantee retirement, and 73% said stock market volatility made predicting  retirement savings difficult. <br /><br />
Only 11% of respondents expected to be able to spend  retirement money on travel or leisure activities, a testament to how low U.S.  retirement expectations have fallen. The rest hoped to live comfortably, pay  their bills and afford increasing healthcare costs. <br /><br />
Seeing the U.S. government continually clenched in political  gridlock isn't helping calm the nerves of future retirees. <br /><br />
Those surveyed felt Washington wasn't in tune with  Americans' retirement concerns. They said lawmakers spent too much time arguing  over issues to actually quell retirement fears. More than 80% of people  surveyed said the flaws in America's retirement system have been exposed and  are in dire need of repair. <br /><br />
One solution some economists advocate is raising the  retirement age to generate more tax revenue and reduce the costs of pensions  and Social Security benefits.<br /><br />
A recent study by the research group American Enterprise  Institute showed that the Social Security system would be in better financial  health if the eligibility age for early benefits was raised to 65 from 62.<br /><br />
Raising the retirement age "could encourage Americans to  remain in the workforce longer, significantly increasing their retirement  income, boosting economic output, and increasing tax revenues," <a target="_blank" href="http://www.npr.org/2011/03/06/134271342/raising-the-retirement-age-can-it-balance-budgets" rel="external nofollow">wrote  Andrew G. Biggs</a>, the study's author. <br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/question-of-the-week/" ><img height="175" width="240" border="0" align="right" style="margin: 10px;" alt="http://moneymorning.com/question-of-the-week/" src="http://moneymorning.com/images2/questionoftheweek.gif"></a>

But others argue that an age change isn't realistic since a  weak state of U.S. employment has left many workers over 55 without jobs. The  unemployment rate among that age group is at its highest level in more than 60  years, leading many to file for early Social Security benefits. <br /><br />
This prompted last week's <strong><em><u>Money Morning</u></em><u> "Question of the Week"</u>: Are you worried about your retirement savings? Are  you concerned that the money you have won't be enough to support you? Have you  been burned by the market when it comes to your retirement? Have you found a retirement saving strategy  that works?</strong><br /><br />
The following reader responses express a variety of retiree  concerns and strategies - such as fleeing the country in search of less  worrisome retirement years. <br /><br />
<h3>Worried It Won't Be Mine </h3>

My concern is downright, flat out, government confiscation  of pension plans as well as IRAs and 401(k)s.<br /><br />
It's being done in Europe.  Heck, why not here?<br /><br />
<p align="right"><strong>- Jane G.</strong></p>
<h3>Feeling More Secure in Ecuador</h3>
I took an early retirement three years ago, because of an  incentive that my employer offered. I receive a pension that is not enough to  live on in the United States, so my wife and I moved to Ecuador at the end of  last year. The cost of living is much less here, and I hope to be able to  increase our financial reserve, rather than see it continue to dwindle. At the  same time I have an IRA that is not large enough, and I am spending quite a bit  of time reading and studying trying to figure out how to invest it so as to  keep it growing. I am not yet tapping into the IRA, and I hope not to for  several years.<br /><br />
We took our time, scoped out the location before actually  moving, and are settling in. I watch markets and events in the United States  and world. I do not know that this is the best move we could have made, but I  am sure that it is miles ahead of doing nothing, or looking for another job in  the United States at my age. <br /><br />
The relief that I have felt since arriving here is  tremendous. I sleep much better, largely because at the very least I feel that  I am acting to prepare for the future, rather than waiting helplessly for the  next crisis. <br /><br />
<p align="right"><strong>- Gordon F.</strong></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://moneymorning.com/images2/QoTW_031511.gif" alt="Question Of The Week: What Are Your Five Biggest Worries?" width="452" height="809" border="0" /><br /><br />
<h3>Stung by the Market</h3>

As an 85-year-old military retiree, I got stung in the stock  market several years ago. So, for the past 10 years or so, I have invested in  munis. The least any of them are paying is 5% double-tax-free. <br /><br />
<p align="right"><strong>- Ben H.</strong></p>
<h3>Concerned About Non-Existent Social Security</h3>

In order to save Social Security, government is proposing  that we should limit benefits to higher-income workers and require them to pay  Social Security taxes on all wages, further reduce the total benefits paid to  early retirees, reduce benefits for people who are 45 or younger, increase the  age at which people are eligible to receive full retirement benefits from 67 to  age 70, and increase Social Security taxes for all workers.<br /><br />
I thought former President Ronald Reagan already saved  Social Security!<br /><br />
In 1983, didn't President Reagan make an agreement with  then-Speaker of the House Tip O'Neal for a $165 billion bailout of Social  Security and the gradual increase in the retirement age from 65 to 67? They  also dramatically increased payroll taxes from 6.15% to the current 15.2%  shared between employees and employers, brought new federal workers into the  system, and for the first time, taxed Social Security benefits. We were assured  that the new Social Security benefits tax was meant only for upper-income  recipients. Conveniently, however, it was never indexed to inflation, meaning  that more and more people have gradually had to pay it over time.<br /><br />
So what did government do with all the money?<br /><br />
Well, the 1983 amendments also included a provision that  excluded the Social Security Trust Fund from the unified budget. This is just  political jargon for taking it "off-budget." It is a political way of using a  cash budget instead of the more appropriate accrual budget normally used for all  the budgets in the U.S. government. It is a way of disguising total spending.<br /><br />
The government has since borrowed all of the money that was  to have saved Social Security from the Social Security Trust Fund, and replaced  it with IOUs.<br /><br />
So what's going to be different this time?<br /><br />
Folks, we have tried doing this once before; they lied to  us! What makes you think they will do anything differently this time? We must  learn one important lesson from all this - Congress will never quit spending.  Any entitlement benefits that we sacrifice of ourselves, be it Social Security  or Medicare, will only get spent in some other way. Like hiring more government  public sector employees, increasing their pay, health and retirement benefits.<br /><br />
This is not the way to solve this crisis; the only way is to  stop government from spending money foolishly. Until then, we can give up all  our Social Security and all our Medicare and it won't make a bit of difference,  as long as government continues its reckless spending of our money.<br /><br />
We have to put our collective foot down and say, "No, you  are not going to get any of my Social Security or Medicare to pad your pockets  anymore ... It's about time that you did some sacrificing yourselves!"<br /><br />
<p align="right"><strong>- Lorne D.</strong></p>
<div class="editors-note"><strong>[<u>Editor's Note:</u> Thanks to all who responded  to last week's "Question of the Week" about retirement concerns. </strong><br /><br />
<strong>Be sure to answer next week's question: </strong><strong>What are your five biggest  worries? What are the five main economic or financial concerns that most  concern those in your household? What issues plaguing the U.S. or global  economy are most worrisome for you? Why do these issues hit closer to home on  your economy radar? What are you doing to financial deal with these concerns?</strong><br /><br />
<strong>Send your answers to </strong><strong><a target="_blank" href="mailto:mailbag@moneymappress.com"><strong>mailbag@moneymappress.com</strong></a>.!</strong><br /><br />
<strong>Is there a topic you want to see covered as a "Question  of the Week" feature? Then let us know by e-mailing <em>Money Morning</em> at <a target="_blank" href="mailto:mailbag@moneymappress.com">mailbag@moneymappress.com</a>. Make  sure to reference "question of the week suggestion" in the subject line. We  reserve the right to edit responses for length, grammar and clarity. </strong><br /><br />
<strong>Thanks to everyone who took the time to participate - via  e-mail or by posting their comments directly on the <em>Money Morning</em> Web  site.]</strong></div>

<strong><u>News and Related Story Links: </u></strong><br /><br />
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>CNBC: </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/41955894"><br />
  Stock Market Volatility       Makes Retirement Planning &lsquo;Impossible': Study</a><strong> </strong> </li>

  <li><strong>National       Institute on Retirement Security: </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/__Story_Inserts/graphics/__PDF/retirement_final_report.pdf"><br />
  Pensions       and Retirement Security 2011: A Roadmap for Policy Makers</a> </li>

  <li><strong>NPR:</strong> <br />
  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.npr.org/2011/03/06/134271342/raising-the-retirement-age-can-it-balance-budgets" rel="external nofollow">Raising       The Retirement Age: Can It Balance Budgets?</a></li>

  <li><strong>Money       Morning News Archive: </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/archives/#topic.q.c.question-of-the-week"><br />
  Question       of the Week Feature</a></li>
</ul>


</div>
			</div></div></div>
					</div>
					
	<br/> <strong>Tags: </strong><a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/401k/" title="401(k)" rel="tag">401(k)</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/baby-boomers/" title="Baby Boomers" rel="tag">Baby Boomers</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/retirement/" title="Retirement" rel="tag">Retirement</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/retirement-portfolio/" title="retirement portfolio" rel="tag">retirement portfolio</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/u-s-economy/" title="U.S. Economy" rel="tag">U.S. Economy</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moneymorning.com/2011/03/16/retirement-concerns-plague-u-s-baby-boomers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Fuel Your Retirement with Dividend Cash</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/05/29/retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://moneymorning.com/2010/05/29/retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Editorial</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investor Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson & Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proctor & Gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/2010/05/29/how-to-fuel-your-retirement-with-dividend-cash/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The financial crisis already put a major dent in your retirement portfolio... and the markets are acting crazy again. What can you do to protect - and grow - your wealth in these markets? Dividends are the way to generate real income - no matter where the market turns. Read this report to discover how to infuse your retirement with cash.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
					<div id="cfct-build-22842" class="cfct-build">
						
				<div id="cfct-row-2cef6af5146767eee79404286dccbc9e" class="cfct-row cfct-row-abc">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-933b489f80f649391ae77bbdc6e5478c" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html ">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content">Too many people watched the global financial crisis annihilate their 401Ks and pensions. And now, the markets are acting crazy again. Your retirement isn't worth the risk of taking another large-scale hit. <br /><br />
After all, what will you do if your retirement portfolio takes another hit? Depend on social security? How long will that last? And, besides, you didn't work all those years just to scrape by on government handouts. <br /><br />
It's time to protect yourself and your retirement. <br /><br />
You need a way to generate real income, despite the market's volatilty. Dividends are key. <br /><br />
Here's why: <br /><br />
<ul><li> Dividends give you instant cash. Any profit from non-paying stocks can only be realized when you sell them.</li>
<li>Dividends give you the freedom of choosing where the money goes - into your wallet, into a savings account, or reinvested into the stock itself.</li></ul>
But perhaps most importantly, studies have shown that dividend stocks perform better -  and with less volatility - over the long haul than non-dividend-paying stocks. <br /><br />
This is critical to preserve - and grow - your wealth. <br /><br />
With dividend stocks you get the best of both worlds: generating stock income while providing downside protection of your assets. <br /><br />
Read on to find out how to fuel your retirement with the power of dividend cash. <br /><br />
<h3>Five Traits of Dynamic Dividend Payers </h3>
For a while, dividends were becoming the endangered species of the stock market. An alarming amount of companies reduced, suspended and/or cancelled their payouts during the financial crisis. <br /><br />
To the companies, it might have been a matter of survival. To investors, though, dividends are a good indicator of how a company really feels about their economic outlook. <br /><br />
But, not all dividends are created equal. Things to keep in mind: <br /><br />
<strong>1. Seek Growth Companies </strong><br /><br />
Companies can't continue paying out steady and generous dividends if they aren't generating revenue. <br /><br />
Some 23 companies in the energy sector are expected to boost their dividend payouts through the end of the second quarter this year - the most among the 10 groups in the S&P 500. And these companies can expect to continue boosting payouts because there will always be a need for energy. <br /><br />
Take that same perspective when looking at other sectors. Think about which companies are providing goods and services whose demand rarely wanes even in the direst of times. Good examples are food and beverage companies, commodity kingpins and prescription drugs.  <br /><br />
<strong>2. Look for a Long History of Increasing Yields </strong><br /><br />
Companies with a long history of increasing its yield are almost always a good bet. They may be safe - boring even - but they're reliable. <br /><br />
By nature, decades of paying dividends attracts more investors to a stock. And more investor backing means a wider capacity to expand profitable operations. These companies know they owe much of their success to their investors, and therefore they aren't likely to pull the plug on their dividends. <br /><br />
Investors should look for companies with a consistent track record of paying regular dividends. You're looking for a commitment on the companies' part that gets stronger over time, not vice versa. <br /><br />
<strong>3. Don't be Fooled by Very High Yields </strong><br /><br />
Remember, you are seeking stable growth and steady income, not flashy payouts that seem too good to be true. <br /><br />
If a company can't support its dividend, it's only a matter of time until the value of the stock itself falls too. <br /><br />
Case in point, a handful of real estate companies and real estate investment trusts (REITs) confidently paid out yields ranging from 6% to 8%. When the housing boom busted, those dividends were the first to go, leaving investors stranded with depressed dividends - or none at all - on freefalling stocks. <br /><br />
Market-wide, the average dividend yield is 1.8%. Investors should be skeptical of anything more than three times that. <br /><br />
<strong>4. Seek Stocks with High Values </strong><br /><br />
A high yield doesn't mean much if the stock isn't worth anything. <br /><br />
For example, if you were only looking for yields, you'd likely find Qualstar Corp's 12.9% yield quite attractive. However, Qualstar stock is valued around the $2 mark. Meanwhile, PepsiCo is paying a 2.89% yield on a stock that's valued around $66 to $67. <br /><br />
With Qualstar, you're getting a per-share dividend of 26 cents. With PepsiCo., you're getting a minimum per-share dividend of $1.90. Plus, you're getting it four times a year. Qualstar hasn't paid its high-yielding divided since November 2009. <br /><br />
All other things being equal, which would you rather have? Pepsi or Qualstar? <br /><br />
<strong>5. See the Big Picture </strong><br /><br />
At first,  dividend payouts may not add up to much. But when combined with other payouts, and multiplied by the number of payouts your holdings give in a year, you're sitting on a handsome sum of extra money you didn't even have to work for. <br /><br />
If you are reinvesting the dividend back into the companies, the value of your investment is likely to increase even faster. <br /><br />
First, owning more shares means more you're collecting more dividends. Second, the company may have increased the yield - as many dividend-paying stalwarts do - which a higher percentage of cash per share coming your way. And third, stock values of dividend-paying companies are more likely to steadily increase over time, again putting that higher yield to work. <br /><br />
With dividends, time works in your favor. And that's why there isn't a better time to start scooping a piece of dividend-paying companies than right now.  <br /><br />
<h3>A few dividend plays to get you started </h3>
Ready to add dividend cash to your retirement portfolio? Here are a few dividend-paying companies to consider. <br /><br />
<strong>ExxonMobil Corp. </strong> (NYSE: XOM) recently bumped its dividend up to 44 cents a share from 42 cents. Exxon is a strong choice because it has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years.<br /><br />
Same goes for its rival <strong>Chevron Corp. </strong> (NYSE: CVX), which boosted its dividend payout to 72 cents a share. Chevron has now raised its dividend for 23 straight years. The company's stock now yields an impressive 3.5%. <br /><br />
Consumer staple <strong>Kellogg Co. </strong> (NYSE: K) has paid dividends since 1986. On April 23, the company increased its payout to 40.5 cents per share. Kellogg currently yields about 2.72%. <br /><br />
<strong>Johnson & Johnson </strong> (NYSE: JNJ) and <strong>Procter & Gamble </strong> (NYSE: PG) are two other consumer staple companies that have a long and strong history of dividend payouts. J&J recently boosted its dividend yield 3.32%. And P&G recently increased its payout to about 48 cents a share. P&G has paid a dividend for 120 consecutive years since its incorporation in 1890. This marks the 54 th consecutive year that the company has increased that dividend. <br /><br />
Finally, <strong>International </strong><strong>Business Machines Corp. </strong> (NYSE: IBM) recently raised its dividend to 65 cents a share from 55 cents a share. Not too shabby. <br /><br />
Together, IBM, Exxon, Procter & Gamble, and Johnson & Johnson account for about 11% of the S&P 500's total dividend yield. <br /><br />
But you can't decide on one, there are dozens of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) whose holdings are comprised of dividend-paying heavyweights, namely <strong>iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index Fund </strong>(NYSE: DVY) <strong>Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF </strong>(NYSE: VIG), <strong>SPDR S&P Dividend ETF </strong>(NYSE: SDY), and <strong>WisdomTree Large Cap Dividend Fund </strong>(NYSE: DLN). <br /><br />
<strong>Editor's Note: </strong> Millions of Americans could suffer another 41% hit to their portfolios in the coming months - and most don't even know it. Yet there's one way to ensure that never happens to you. In one step you can avoid the pitfall, collect guaranteed cash payments, and pocket a 43% rate of return on your money - enough to get an easy double in less two years.  <a target=_blank href="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/MMR0509copy.html?pub=MMR&code=PMMRK804" rel="external nofollow">Click here to get the full report</a>.</div>
			</div></div></div>
				</div>
					</div>
					
	<br/> <strong>Tags: </strong><a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/401k/" title="401(k)" rel="tag">401(k)</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/chevron/" title="Chevron" rel="tag">Chevron</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/dividends/" title="Dividends" rel="tag">Dividends</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/exxon/" title="Exxon" rel="tag">Exxon</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/financial-crisis/" title="Financial Crisis" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/global-economy/" title="Global Economy" rel="tag">Global Economy</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/ibm/" title="IBM" rel="tag">IBM</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/johnson-johnson/" title="Johnson &amp; Johnson" rel="tag">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/kellogg/" title="Kellogg" rel="tag">Kellogg</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/proctor-gamble/" title="Proctor &amp; Gamble" rel="tag">Proctor &amp; Gamble</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/retirement/" title="Retirement" rel="tag">Retirement</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/social-security-medicare/" title="Social Security Medicare" rel="tag">Social Security Medicare</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moneymorning.com/2010/05/29/retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Government Wants to Hijack Your 401(k)</title>
		<link>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/27/retirement-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/27/retirement-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Fitz-Gerald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Fitz-Gerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=16116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's bad enough that we've been forced to bail out Wall Street. But now the Obama administration is hatching plans to raid our retirement savings, too. <br /><br />
To say that I'm &#34;outraged&#34; doesn't come close to describing the emotions I experience every time I think about the government's latest hare-brained scheme. <br /><br />
According to <a target="_blank" href="http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_OBAMA-DEMOCRATS-LOOK-AT-TAKEOVER-OF-401K-IRA-ACCOUNTS-TO-FINANCE-GOVERNMENT/BLOG/1716156/78592.html">widespread media reports</a>, both the U.S. Treasury Department and the Department of Labor plan are planning to stage a public-comment period before implementing regulations that would require U.S. savers to invest portions of their 401(k) savings plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) into annuities or other &#34;steady&#34; payment streams backed by U.S. government bonds. <br /><br />
Folks, there's only one reason these agencies would do such a thing - the nation's creditors think that U.S. government bonds are a bad bet and don't want to buy them anymore. So like a grifter who's down to his last dollar, the administration is hoping to get its hands on our hard-earned savings before the American people realize they've had the wool pulled over their eyes ... once again. <br /><br />
<a href="http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/27/retirement-plans/">For the full details on the government's newest financial gambit, read on...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
					<div id="cfct-build-16116" class="cfct-build">
						
				<div id="cfct-row-e89872e7e09d23ca30eface29db6a2a6" class="cfct-row cfct-row-abc">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-62bd4dfe8359dd74a30bf629fbc5f407" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content">It's bad enough that we've been forced to bail out Wall Street. But now the Obama administration is hatching plans to raid our retirement savings, too. <br /><br />
To say that I'm &quot;outraged&quot; doesn't come close to describing the emotions I experience every time I think about the government's latest hare-brained scheme. <br /><br />
According to <a target=_blank href="http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_OBAMA-DEMOCRATS-LOOK-AT-TAKEOVER-OF-401K-IRA-ACCOUNTS-TO-FINANCE-GOVERNMENT/BLOG/1716156/78592.html" rel="external nofollow">widespread media reports</a>, both the U.S. Treasury Department and the Department of Labor plan are planning to stage a public-comment period before implementing regulations that would require U.S. savers to invest portions of their 401(k) savings plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) into annuities or other &quot;steady&quot; payment streams backed by U.S. government bonds. <br /><br />
Folks, there's only one reason these agencies would do such a thing - the nation's creditors think that U.S. government bonds are a bad bet and don't want to buy them anymore. So like a grifter who's down to his last dollar, the administration is hoping to get its hands on our hard-earned savings before the American people realize they've had the wool pulled over their eyes ... once again. <br /><br />
It's easy to understand why. <br /><br /></div>
			</div></div></div>
				</div>
				<div id="cfct-row-278a6491c94b910d8f65a80910911bff" class="cfct-row cfct-row-abc">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-b9de79e233e75d7a5537c1e7f81fd5cf" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module mm-toolbar-module">
				
			</div></div></div>
				</div><div id="cfct-row-530749e2e494b512a1d9c8bff9252731" class="cfct-row cfct-row-float-a"><div id="cfct-block-4b85e387512acd482725e177739dcdf1" class="cfct-block cfct-block-float-a">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-widget-module-cfox_preload">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content"><div id="cfox_preload-cfct-module-b6ad4fb4052aa5cd5fe1400296215206" class="widget cfox_preload">			<div class="cfox_preload_widget">
							</div>
			</div></div>
			</div></div><div id="cfct-block-1e8c5a6ad9f20b6b14b8d634b872125a" class="cfct-block cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html">
				<div class="cfct-mod-content">Facing a $14 trillion fiscal hangover, the Treasury can no longer count countries such as Japan and China to be dependable buyers of U.S. government debt. Not only have those nations dramatically reduced their purchasing of U.S. bonds, most of our largest creditors are now actively diversifying their reserves away from greenback-based investments in favor of other reliable stores of value - like oil, gold and other commodities. <br /><br />
This growing reluctance couldn't come at a worse time. Just yesterday (Tuesday), in fact, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the U.S. budget deficit <a target=_blank href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/deficit-to-hit-13-trillion-in-2010-cbo-says-2010-01-26?dist=countdown" rel="external nofollow">would hit $1.35 trillion this year</a>. And that's not the only shortfall the Treasury has to address. The U.S. Federal Reserve is supposed to stop buying Treasury bonds for its asset portfolio, a program the central bank put in place last year. <br /><br />
The upshot: The Obama administration has to find other ways sell government debt - without raising interest rates, a move that would almost certainly jeopardize the country's super-weak economic recovery. <br /><br />
Facing an uphill battle and increasingly skeptical buyers, the government is changing tactics and targeting the biggest pile of money available as a means of dealing with its fiscal follies - <a target=_blank href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20603037&sid=aHFCE999fWR0" rel="external nofollow">the $3.6 trillion sitting in U.S. retirement plans</a>, including 401(k) plans. <br /><br />
The way I see it, the Obama administration can see the financial train wreck that's going to occur. So it's rushing to crack open the safe that holds our retirement money before anyone realizes that they've been robbed. <br /><br />
And if this plan becomes reality, that's just what it will be - robbery. American retail investors didn't sign up for the financial-crisis roller-coaster ride we've been on since 2008. We didn't approve the nation's five-fold increase in lending capacity. And we certainly didn't volunteer to help pay down a national debt that's doubled. <br /><br />
Few people realize that the federal government spent an estimated $17,000 to $25,000 per U.S. household in 2009 (the final figures haven't been calculated, yet). But that's no surprise: &quot;We the people&quot; didn't approve it. <br /><br />
At a point where it's spending money like a drunken sailor, Washington seems more interested in appropriating and redistributing our retirement savings than it is in fixing a system that's badly broken. If you add in all the stimulus spending that the taxpayers must now repay, the average government-agency-spending tab has zoomed more than 50% in the last couple of years. That's right - 50%. <br /><br />
So it's only logical that the administration would go after our 401(k) and IRA savings plans. <br /><br />
Disgusting, but logical. <br /><br />
Here's how the argument is likely to be framed. <br /><br />
The system we presently have in place is what's commonly called a &quot;<a target=_blank href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/key-elements/savings-retirement/defined-contribution.cfm" rel="external nofollow">defined contribution plan</a>.&quot; Under such a plan, the benefits we enjoy during retirement aren't determined in advance. Instead, those benefits are determined by how much money we contribute while working, and by the performance of the investments that we choose. The 401(k) is almost exclusively a defined contribution plan. <br />
<br />
Years ago, Americans depended more upon &quot;defined benefit plans&quot; that promised a steady stream of income at a future date - with the actual amounts determined by our years of service or our earnings history. Old-fashioned company pension plans and even U.S. Social Security are examples of defined benefit plans. <br /><br />
By laying claim to our retirement assets in exchange for 30-year Treasury bonds, annuities or other payout streams, the government will try to persuade us that we're not capable of managing our own money, that the stock market is too risky a place for most Americans, and that we need Big Brother to hold our hands and protect our futures. <br /><br />
What we need, the administration is going to tell us, is a defined benefit plan. <br /><br />
So expect a big snow job. But here's the problem. <br /><br />
Defined benefit plans are great <em>only </em> as long as they are well funded. Unfortunately, most aren't. <br /><br />
In fact, according to various studies, pension funds could already be underfunded by as much as $5.3 trillion. Add that to the $14 trillion we've already got on the table and we're talking a staggering $19.3 trillion - and that's with no escalators, no cost-of-living adjustments and no interest-rate increases. And that's assuming we <em>don't </em> need another round of stimulus. <br /><br />
Here's what the government isn't going to tell you. When pension funds transition from defined contribution plans to defined benefit plans, the only backing they have is the underlying assets themselves and the company or entity that's responsible for the plans - which in this case would be the U.S. government. <br /><br />
If the prospects of your entire future being placed in the hands of the federal government doesn't scare the daylights out of you after all we've experienced so far, I suspect that nothing will. <br /><br />
Our elected leaders, appointed government guardians, and Wall Street have together demonstrated a total inability to manage what they already control. There's no reason on the planet why they should be allowed to get their hands on our hard-won savings. All that will do is punish the thrifty, disciplined and far-sighted investor, while rewarding - or at the very least protecting - the inept politicians and career bureaucrats who allowed this crisis to occur in the first place. <br /><br />
By backing their plan with 30-year Treasuries, government backers of this plan are betting that you and I won't notice that the trouble with annuities and long bonds is that they tend to get annihilated by inflation. That's why even the most jaded professionals will tell you that investing in such instruments right now when interest rates are being artificially held down near 0.00% is bad <a target=_blank href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juju" rel="external nofollow">juju</a>: Interest rates have only one direction to travel - up, which tends to crush bond prices. <br /><br />
Right now, Americans are apparently smarter than the administration believes. In fact, a survey by the Investment Company Institute found that more than 70% of all households disagreed with the idea of requiring a retiree to buy an annuity with a portion of their assets. And it didn't matter whether the annuity was offered by an insurance company or by the government. <br /><br />
Let's hope that the full-court press that the administration is getting ready to deploy doesn't snow American investors. If the government succeeds, we'll look back and see that they pulled a pretty slick trick to get our support. <br /><br />
Unfortunately, it won't be the last trick they play with our retirement money. That last trick will come after they have control of our savings - when they make our retirements disappear. <br /><br />
<strong><u>News and Related Story Links</u></strong>: <br /><br />
<ul>
  <li><strong>MyFoxNews</strong>: <a target=_blank href="http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_OBAMA-DEMOCRATS-LOOK-AT-TAKEOVER-OF-401K-IRA-ACCOUNTS-TO-FINANCE-GOVERNMENT/BLOG/1716156/78592.html"><br>
  OBAMA / DEMOCRATS LOOK AT TAKEOVER OF 401(K) IRA ACCOUNTS TO FINANCE GOVERNMENT</a><br>
  </li>
  <li><strong>Bloomberg News</strong>: <a target=_blank href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20603037&sid=aHFCE999fWR0"><br>
  Retiree Annuities May Be Promoted by Obama Aides<br>
  </a></li>
  <li><strong>MarketWatch.com</strong>: <a target=_blank href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/deficit-to-hit-13-trillion-in-2010-cbo-says-2010-01-26?dist=countdown"><br>
  Deficit to hit $1.35 trillion in 2010, CBO says</a><br>
  </li>
  <li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>: <a target=_blank href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juju"><br>
  Juju</a><br>
  </li>
  <li><strong>Tax Policy Center</strong>: <a target=_blank href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/key-elements/savings-retirement/defined-contribution.cfm"><br>
  Defined Contribution Plan</a><br>
  </li>
  <li><strong>Bloomberg News</strong>: <a target=_blank href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=alwTE0Z5.1EA"><br>
  Hidden Pension Fiasco May Foment Another $1 Trillion Bailout</a></li>
</ul></div>
			</div></div></div>
					</div>
					
	<br/> <strong>Tags: </strong><a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/401k/" title="401(k)" rel="tag">401(k)</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/budget-deficit/" title="Budget Deficit" rel="tag">Budget Deficit</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/deficit/" title="Deficit" rel="tag">Deficit</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/iras/" title="IRAs" rel="tag">IRAs</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/obama-administration/" title="Obama Administration" rel="tag">Obama Administration</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/taxes/" title="Taxes" rel="tag">Taxes</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/27/retirement-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

