Press Esc to close

Welcome to Money Morning - Only the News You Can Profit From.


The Cybersecurity Play That Doubled Once – Will Double Again

Not long ago, a relative of mine was the victim of identity theft. And I have to tell you that I really felt for the entire family.

The thief ran up nearly $20,000 in charges, opened new accounts and tried to open others.

And I can tell you that the frustrations over the losses (most of which ended up being covered) were dwarfed by the helplessness that came whenever new charges showed up – and the worry that was spawned by never finding out how the whole mess started.

As we watch the headlines about data breaches and cybercrime – and watch as the violations move closer and closer to home – those worries only escalate.

  • Banking

  • Heavy-Handed Politics Could Boost Bank Reform, Stock Prices and the Economy Defenders of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) say the civil fraud charges the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has levied against the investment-banking giant are without foundation, and are politically timed to push President Barack Obama's bank-reform agenda.

    In his Cooper Union speech to Wall Street and the American public yesterday (Thursday), President Obama took pointed aim at opponents of his bank-reform agenda by stating: "Unless your products depend on bilking people, there's little to fear from these reforms."

    Whether or not the timing of the Goldman Sachs fraud case was politically motivated, or whether or not President Obama was referring to Goldman with his "bilking" comment, one thing is for sure: The president and his administration are taking the reform fight to the Street.

    At stake in this fight is the future of our capital markets, the health of the U.S. economy and the direction of the U.S. stock market.

    To see how the Obama bank-reform push could perpetuate the bull market, please read on...

  • Bankster Gangsters: Global Commodities Grab Causes Major Bank Profits to Soar Major bank profits are up. Way up.

    Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) just reported that its first-quarter earnings nearly doubled to $3.46 billion, the investment-banking giant's second-most-profitable quarter since going public a decade ago.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) recently said its first-quarter earnings came in at $3.3 billion, up 55% from a year ago.

    And Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) reported that its earnings for the first three months of the year rang in at $2.83 billion.

    For all three of these banking giants, the first-quarter results blew past analyst expectations. Their stock prices? Approaching levels not seen since the start of the financial crisis. In fact, JPMorgan's stock is within 10% of its five-year high.

    Major bank profits are zooming - despite the fact that U.S. consumers are struggling to repay loans.

    So how are these guys pulling this off? Well, if you dig, you'll find that the bulk of major bank profits are coming from stronger trading revenue and other segments that are enabling the largest banks to overcome weakness in the lending area, which decades ago was the banking sector's bread-and-butter business.

    If you dig deeper still, as I've done, you unearth one of the key reasons these banking behemoths are booking such massive profits. They've been moving enormous amounts of capital into one area of the market.

    I'm talking about commodities.

    For an inside look at how banks can reap 15-fold returns on their physical-commodities stakes, please read on... Read More...
  • Goldman's First-Quarter Profit Doubles to $3.46 Billion, Even as its Fraud Probe Takes on an International Twist Investment-banking giant Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) - the target of a civil fraud case filed by U.S. securities regulators - yesterday reported that its first-quarter earnings nearly doubled, even as the probe against it took on an international twist.

    The New York-based Goldman said it earned reported first quarter earnings of $3.46 billion today (Tuesday), or $5.59 a share, an increase of 91% from earnings of $1.66 billion, or $3.39 a share, for the same period a year ago. The earnings report came just days after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil fraud case against the Wall Street financial heavyweight.

    Goldman's earnings beat analysts' average estimates of $4.16 a share. Its investment bank income revenue rose to $12.78 billion, and its fixed-income, currency and commodities trading generated net revenue of $7.39 billion.

  • Regional Banks Are Bouncing Back – And You Can Profit Our contrarian thesis in regional bank stocks has played out well in the past few weeks, as other investors are beginning to see that these companies are under-appreciated, under-priced, over-hated and over-shorted.

    The iShares Regional Banks(NYSE: IAT) ripped higher by more than 8% in the past week alone. And I still think that many of these stocks have a long way to go, since fair value in some cases is 2x, 3x, and even 5x higher than current levels.

    Super-regional southern bankRegions Financial Corp.(NYSE: RF), for instance, traded as high as $32.50 in 2007, then fell as low as $2.27 in 2009 - a decline of 93% in just two years. RF's recovery has gotten off to a much slower start than peers likeU.S. Bancorp(NYSE: USB) because it made a lot more iffy loans along the Gulf coast. But over the past six months, it has become clear that super-low interest rates will allow RF to build enough reserve against losses. Additionally, other distressed-debt firms are stepping up to take problem mortgages off their hands.

  • How to Stop Greedy Banks From Killing U.S. Capitalism A white paper on bank reform delivered to Congress and regulators last week by the Association of Mortgage Investors - the powerful lobbying group that represents huge institutional investors - warns that if the securitization market isn't radically reformed "it will be difficult if not impossible for capital market investors to return to funding economic activity."

    What the report doesn't say is that banks - standing in the way of bank reform - don't want a simplified, standardized, and transparent securitization market, because that would revitalize free-market disciplines and undermine the control they exercise over the credit markets.

    Right now, the stock market is discounting news about tight credit conditions. But analysts worry about an increasing disconnect between rallying stock prices and the hoped-for rebounds in consumer-driven growth and the U.S. housing market - both of which are struggling with a lack of access to credit. This disconnect is fostering fears of a stock-market correction.

    Investors need to understand exactly what's at stake here. And they need to know how to protect themselves and - even more important - how to profit from the volatile-but-powerful capital waves that will result from this fundamental battle over our future.

    To understand the escalating risk – and strategies needed to protect the free markets – please read on... Read More...
  • Three Ways to Profit From an Insurance-Sector Rebound Regional banks, investment bankers and insurance companies will be key winners in the next phase of an advance that will be characterized by very lukewarm participation by the average private investor.

    Most investors will be surprised by this turnabout - and especially by the insurance-sector rebound.

    Let me show you three ways to profit.

    To find out what companies will profit from this new trend, read on... Read More...
  • Lehman Execs Have No One to Blame but Themselves The U.S. bankruptcy-court examiner investigating the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. issued a stinging report Friday that accused senior executives of freewheeling accounting practices that led to the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history and sparked the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

    The 2200-page report, authored by Anton Valukas, chairman of the Chicago-based law firm Jenner & Block LLP, also excoriated Wall Street investment banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) and Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) for finally pushing Lehman over the edge by demanding more collateral and changing guarantee agreements, Bloomberg News reported.

    But the report says ultimate responsibility for its collapse can be attributed to a wrong-headed business model that rewarded excessive risk and encouraged leverage - problems that were brought to a head by the investment banks and government agencies.

  • New Banking Regulations … Same Old Story U.S. banks, drunk with greed, drove the nation's economy to the brink of financial Armageddon.

    To save U.S. banks from losing their license to dangle the nation's economy over a cliff, the U.S. Federal Reserve and the country's elected elite threw them a bailout party and gifted them with the accounting- world's version of "Transformers. "

    Unfortunately, new banking regulations aimed at solving these problems are little more than the same old song and dance that forced the bailout - and stuck U.S. taxpayers with a multi-trillion-dollar tab.

    To see how reformers have failed to fix the banking system, please read on...

  • AIG Could Seek Another Bailout as it Struggles to Return to Profitability American International Group Inc. (NYSE: AIG), the insurance giant that received billions in federal bailout money, on Friday reported an $8.9 billion fourth-quarter loss. AIG dismissed the loss as part of its rebuilding process, but it also acknowledged that it may require even more government financing.

    The loss is not nearly as bad as the previous year's $61.7 billion fourth-quarter stumble - the biggest quarterly loss in corporate history - but at $65.51 a share, it's still much higher than analysts predicted.

    Amid scrutiny, AIG in September 2008 received a $182.3 billion bailout, which gave the government an 80% stake in its business. Since then, AIG's debt pay-off funds have generally come from the sale of its non-core assets. AIG recognizes these "fire-sales" as the best way to pay back its debts while also streamlining its business.

  • How Banks Are "Crowding Out" the U.S. Rebound When U.S. President Barack Obama unveiled the $787 billion "stimulus" bill of extra spending and modest tax cuts last year, it became clear that the U.S. budget deficit was going to eclipse the 10% of gross domestic product (GDP) level for at least one year (and, as we now know, probably three years).

    On those grounds, I opposed the "stimulus" - a position that was a lot less popular then than it has since become. However, as I'll show you below, it now looks as if I was right - and the implications for the U.S. economy are highly worrisome.

    You see, the theory postulated by economist John Maynard Keynes holds that the extra spending stimulates additional output fails to address the question of where the money comes from.

    Government cannot create wealth - it has to borrow it. If, before the stimulus, government finances were in good shape, as was the case in China, then stimulus does indeed stimulate: The modest budget deficit that it causes is easily financed, and the extra spending creates some jobs and maybe some useful infrastructure, depending on how well targeted it is.

    In the United States, however, government finances were in a mess before the stimulus began.

    To find out how banks are blunting the recovery, read on .... Read More...
  • Money Morning Mailbag: How the Demise of Glass-Steagall Helped Spawn the Credit Crisis Question: Please address why the removal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 caused the financial meltdown of 2007 and why its reinstatement is the only way to stop the financially risky behavior allowed after it's removal. Address why we will very likely have another meltdown (probably in 2010) unless reinstated.

    Answer: Mr. Scott: While the overturning of what remained of Glass-Steagall did not cause the meltdown, it certainly contributed mightily to the systemic nature of the crisis.

    Allowing commercial banks and investment banks to marry created giant operations that became too big to fail and too profitable to break up. Everyone was making money. The overriding problem was not the integration of commercial (deposit-taking and loan-making) banks with investment (capital-markets trading) banks, but the extraordinary migration of all banks into the same products, trading, and risk-taking businesses. I am definitely including the ubiquitous game of mortgage origination, securitization, sales and trading.

  • CIT Taps Former Merrill Chief Thain as New CEO In a move that unites two prominent casualties of the financial crisis, CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: CIT) ended a prolonged search by naming John Thain, the former chief of Merrill Lynch & Co., as its new chairman and chief executive officer.

    Thain, who left Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) 13 months ago amid controversy over its takeover of Merrill, will have his hands full rebuilding CIT, an embattled commercial lender that nearly collapsed in 2009.

    CIT still operates under restrictions that were imposed after receiving $2.3 billion in funding under terms of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Those measures include being banned from the commercial paper market, its traditional source of funding.

  • Arctic Chill Frames Divergence in G-7 Economic Policies at Canada Meet In between bites of seal meat and dogsled races, the financial heads of the Group of Seven (G-7) countries met near the Arctic Circle in Canada last weekend to hammer out differences in how their respective countries will approach monetary policy as the economic recovery takes hold.

    Windchill temperatures hovered around -40C in Iqaluit, just south of the Arctic Circle, as finance ministers and central bankers from the world's biggest industrialized economies met. Mostly, they stayed close to their cozy fireplaces as they discussed the nuts and bolts of financial regulation and global imbalances.

    Indeed, different countries...
  • Obama Aims to Spur Small Business Hiring With $30 Billion Lending Program In the latest in a series of efforts to spur American businesses to hire more workers, President Barack Obama today (Tuesday) issued a proposal to provide community banks with $30 billion to increase lending to small businesses.

    The new lending program aims to invest $30 billion in 8,000 banks to provide loans to businesses ready to hire new workers. Funding for the program would come from money returned by large banks to the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), and would require Congressional approval.

    "Small businesses...have created roughly 65% of all new jobs over the past decade and a half. And I think we should make it easier for them," Mr. Obama said in a statement obtained by The Wall Street Journal. "This will help small banks do even more of what our economy needs: ensure that small businesses are once again the engine of job growth in America."

  • Why the Volcker Plan Doesn't Go Far Enough I don't often agree with the Obama administration. So I have to say that I was surprised when I heard it had a plan to reduce the risk of another banking crisis. It wants to prohibit banks that are protected by deposit insurance from engaging in risky, proprietary trading, and it wants to break up some of the very largest banks.

    I made both those recommendations in my forthcoming book "Alchemists of Loss" (Wiley 2010). The book, written jointly with Kevin Dowd, a British finance professor, should debut sometime late this spring(we sent the manuscript to the publisher last weekend - what a relief!). But after I studied the Obama plan further, I realized that I shouldn't have been surprised - the idea's sponsor was former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul A. Volcker.

    Why Volcker's plan doesn’t go far enough...