Press Esc to close

Welcome to Money Morning - Only the News You Can Profit From.


Cash in on This "Invisible" $33 Billion Business

U.S. defense contractors don’t make a habit of sending “thank you” letters to America’s enemies.

But if they did, the corporate leaders at The Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) might want to look up Vladimir Putin‘s address – before running to the Hallmark store.

Full Story

  • Featured Story

    It's Apple vs. Samsung in a Fight for Mobile (Nasdaq: AAPL)

    The multi-front war between mobile computing rivals Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Samsung Electronics Co. (PINK: SSNLF) moved into a California courtroom this week.

    Brewing for months, the patent trial officially began on Monday with jury selection. Apple is suing Samsung for $2.5 billion in damages, accusing the Korean company of "slavishly copying" both the hardware and software of its iPhone design.

    Samsung has emerged as the biggest threat to the iPhone's continuing growth. Samsung sold 50 million smartphones in the June quarter, by far the most of any vendor.

    Meanwhile, AAPL reported sales of just 26 million iPhones in its June quarter - a major concern since Apple gets more than half of its revenue and profits from the iPhone.

    Samsung has countersued, claiming the iPhone infringes on patents it holds that enable all smartphones to function. Samsung wants a 2.4% licensing fee for each iPhone sold, which would cost Apple a whopping $2 billion per year.

    The ferocity of the fight stems from what's at stake. Both want to dominate the rapidly growing market for mobile computing devices -- smartphones and tablets.

    "This is a cage match for rights to one of the most lucrative markets in the world," Colin Gillis, an analyst at BGC Financial, told the Los Angeles Times. "They're fighting on everything: They're fighting on innovation, they're fighting on price, they're fighting in the courts."

    To continue reading, please click here...
  • patent wars

  • How to Spot Winners as Facebook (Nasdaq: FB) and Friends Fight Patent Wars For big players like Facebook Inc. (Nasdaq: FB) and Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL), last summer marked a dramatic turn toward patent warfare in the world of technology.

    Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) and Apple in July 2011 spent over $4.5 billion at an auction on a portfolio of 6,000 patents.

    Then in August, Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG) purchased Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion, gaining over 17,000 patents.

    Facebook and Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO) currently headline the battlefield. This spring, Facebook spent a whopping $550 billion on patents. Then Yahoo sued Facebook for patent infringement.

    You should expect more lawsuits as many of the tech giants have a similar wartime strategy: The best defense is a good offense.

    The plan is to snatch up as many patents as possible, then defend their plunder. The strategy effectively chokes out the competition, preventing the other guy from developing or implementing new technology because doing so infringes on patents.

    But aggressive patent warfare leads to a big casualty: innovation. Technology investment buzzwords like creativity, growth, research and development take a sideline while companies lock each other up with litigation.

    In fact, companies heavily participating in patent warfare doom themselves to fail. That's why investors should steer clear of the patent trolls.

    Becoming a Monster: Patent Trolls

    Patent trolls buy patents specifically to extort money from innovators. They are akin to a modern day mafia, according to the The Washington Post.

    Patent trolls take advantage of the fact that litigation in any arena is typically a war of resources.

    They sit atop their pile of patents, waiting to have a tenable enough argument that a company has been infringed upon. Then they sue.

    The result? A patent troll suit can easily annihilate tech startups that simply don't have the resources to outlast a larger company in litigation.

    Any tech company putting major effort into aggressive patent litigation should raise a red flag to investors. It is evidence of mixed-up priorities that scream failure.

    For example, let's take a look at Yahoo.

    To continue reading, please click here...