The Fed's "Strong Dollar Policy" Actually Isn't So Strong

By Peter D. Schiff
Guest Columnist

Ever since Robert Rubin began the tradition in the mid-1990s, it has been a significant element of the U.S. treasury secretary's job to continuously state that a strong dollar is in the national interest. It is widely regarded that such utterances, if repeated often enough, can constitute the sum total of what is still laughingly known as the nation's "strong dollar policy."

Over the past two generations, the American government has launched many failed "campaigns." To list just a few, there has been the "War on Drugs," the "War on Poverty," and the continued attempts to improve education. But the strong dollar policy must be seen as the poster child for all failed Federal policies. However, many in the market took cheer that the policy is now being greatly expanded. In an unprecedented move, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is now adding his voice to the chorus and using the same rhetoric previously used by the treasury secretary alone. That's two people saying the words...not just one. A double-barreled, strong-dollar policy!

A New Game Plan?

As the administration is so fond of saying, a nation's currency reflects the underlying strength of its economy, and in that sense can be seen as a nation's economic report card. In truth, a strong currency is in the interest of every nation, just as good grades are in the interest of every student.  Using this basic analogy, a flunking student cannot improve his grades by simply telling his parents, teachers, and fellow students that he has adopted a "straight 'A' policy." If his words are not accompanied by an actual change in behavior - whereby he stops cutting class and starts studying more - his new policy is unlikely to achieve results. So long as his bad habits persist, the policy will not be any more effective simply because one of his friends chimes in.

In his speech last week, Bernanke finally admitted that the weakness in the dollar was contributing to both higher inflation and elevated inflation expectations. This stands in stark contrast to his recent testimony in front of the House Banking Committee, where in response to a question asked by U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, Bernanke confidently declared that the weakness of the dollar only affected Americans who travel abroad. It is amazing how little attention this complete reversal received.

The media of course wasted no time in declaring that Bernanke's speech heralded the opening of a new front in the campaign against the falling dollar.  For example, CNBC's Larry Kudlow proclaimed that Bernanke had endorsed "King Dollar" (someone needs to remind Kudlow that the king has long since abdicated his throne) and the network ran an entire segment on how to profit from the new dollar rally [Money Morning, of course, warned readers that this "dollar rally" was actually a "head fake of legendary proportions"].

All of this because Bernanke merely mentioned the dollar, acknowledged its effects on inflation, and expressed concern for its plight. As far as the media and Wall Street are concerned, words without action are enough. Too bad that's not the way things work here on the planet Earth.

Investors received an encore performance yesterday (Tuesday), when bond, currency and interest-rate markets reacted very strongly to comments that Bernanke had made the night before: Investors took his inflationary concerns as a very clear signal that short-term interest rates will likely jump this year [again, something Money Morning has already been predicted].

The Doomed Dollar?

The real take away from Bernanke's comments is not that the dollar is about to rally, but that it is now more likely to sink even lower.  I believe the main reason Bernanke has refrained from mentioning the dollar in the past is that he did not want to be put in a position of actually having to do something about its decline.  He is now so fearful of an imminent dollar collapse that he must have felt compelled to throw down the gauntlet - despite his very real fear that someone might actually pick it up.

Story continues below...

My guess is that currency traders will ultimately see this as an act of desperation. When the dollar keeps falling, there will be a chorus of demands that the Fed put some real teeth in its new policy.  If Bernanke does nothing, the world will finally see a naked emperor and the dollar's decline will turn into a rout.  If, on the other hand, the Fed raises interest rates to defend the dollar, and only a short-term bounce results, then all remaining confidence in the Fed's ability to support the dollar will evaporate as well.

This is probably Bernanke's greatest fear and is likely the main reason he waited so long before mentioning the dollar.  The fact that he felt compelled to do so now likely means he knows the game is coming to an end.

Got gold?

[Editor's Note: Global investing guru Peter D. Schiff last wrote about gold for Money Morning. For a more-detailed analysis of the nation's financial problems, and the inherent dangers that these problems pose for both the U.S. economy and for dollar-denominated investments, download Peter Schiff's new financial-research report: "The Collapsing Dollar: The Powerful Case for Investing in Foreign Securities." That report is free of charge. Check out Money Morning's latest report on gold investments, published Friday as part of our ongoing "Cashing in on Commodities" series. That report - "Is Gold Headed for $1,500 an Ounce?" - also is free of charge.]

News and Related Story Links:

  • Euro Pacific Capital Inc. Special Research Report:
    The Collapsing Dollar: The Powerful Case for Investing in Foreign Securities.
  • Money Morning Financial Commentary:
    A Currency Conundrum: Beware of the U.S. Dollar's "Head Fake" Rally.