By Jason Simpkins
Both U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke were called to the carpet yesterday (Tuesday) to explain to Congress how continued turbulence in U.S. credit markets will affect the economy in coming months.
Both ended up backtracking on previous statements, as their ill-conceived cures for the broader U.S. economy were stripped of any relevancy by a tumultuous and unforgiving credit market.
Fannie Mae (FNM) dropped $2.13 a share, or 22% yesterday, to close at $7.60 share. Freddie Mac (FRE) sank $1.77, or 25%, to close at $5.34 a share. The beleaguered mortgage giants dragged the market down with them, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 92 points, or .84% at 10,962.54. It had earlier fallen as low as 10,840.81. The S&P 500 Index closed at 1,214.91 down 13 points, or 1%.
After saying Sunday that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “play a central role in our housing finance system and must continue to do so,” Paulson amended his comments to the Senate Banking Committee, saying his plan “is aimed at supporting the stability of financial markets, not just these two companies.”
“Let me stress that there are no immediate plans to access either the proposed liquidity or the proposed capital backstop," Paulson added. “If either authority is used, it would be done so only at Treasury's discretion, under terms and conditions that protect the U.S. taxpayer.”
Similarly, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke was forced to rethink his previous statements concerning the progress of the economy.
After saying in June that the risks of a “substantial downturn” had diminished and the Fed would shift its focus to resisting “an erosion of longer-term inflation expectations,” Bernanke said before Congress today, that the economy “continues to face numerous difficulties, including ongoing strains in financial markets, declining house prices, a softening labor market, and rising prices of oil [and] food.”
Now, as credit markets tighten and inflation continues to strengthen its grip on the U.S. economy, both Paulson and Bernanke have the unenviable task of shepherding the economy through one of the most difficult economic climates of the past century.
After opening higher Monday following Paulson's remarks and a successful sale of short-term debt at Freddie, both stocks resumed their slide with each company falling more than 30% in the past two days. Fannie Mae has lost 81% year-to-date, while Freddie Mac has dropped 84.5%.
“The impact of Sunday’s announcement by the Federal Reserve regarding its mortgage bail-out plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remains somewhat derided in the market,” James Hughes at CMC Markets told the Financial Times. ”It has apparently done little more than underline the perilous state of the U.S. economy.”
Both Freddie and Fannie have cash on hand, and both meet their regulatory capital requirements. It also looks as though both firms will also be bolstered by U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s rescue plan, which includes generous credit lines and a pledge by the U.S. government to purchase equity in the companies as needed.
But government assistance notwithstanding, investors and analysts anticipate falling house prices and an increasing number of mortgage defaults will incinerate what little capital the companies have left. Their balance sheets are also highly suspect, though Freddie Mac looks far worse off than Fannie Mae.
At the end of the first quarter Freddie’s balance sheet showed assets of $803 billion and shareholder equity of just $16 billion, CNNMoney reported. That means Freddie has just one dollar in equity for every $50 of mortgages and other assets it holds. The company’s mortgage portfolio is even more disconcerting, as it shows just 70 cents worth of equity for every $100 worth of business on its books.
“Is this enough equity when your business consists of buying and guaranteeing mortgages?” Len Blum, a managing director at New York investment bank Westwood Capital, wrote in a recent report quoted by CNN. “How about when you conduct these activities in markets falling by 20% or more?”
Finally, according to the fair-value balance sheet, which reflects the value of Freddie’s assets rather than their cost, the company’s shareholder equity stands at negative $5.2 billion. Using fair-value accounting, Fannie Mae shareholders are still up $12 billion.
Also, as other lenders have withdrawn from the mortgage market in the face of plummeting home values and a mountain of foreclosure filings Fannie and Freddie have been left to pick up the slack to the point that they are now involved in 80% of U.S. mortgages.
With so much on the line, the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae would be cataclysmic. And not just for the U.S. market, but for global investors.
Because government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), such as Fannie and Freddie, offer higher yields than treasuries and enjoy implicit assurances from the U.S. government, they are very appealing to foreign investors who hold approximately $1 trillion in GSE debt.
Indeed, if Fannie and Freddie were to fail, it would undermine these investments and cost international investors dearly.
The ongoing struggles at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also represent an additional hurdle for U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke. The Fed chair was already struggling to balance sluggish growth and soaring inflation, and now volatility in the credit markets has flared up precisely as the Fed was starting to telegraph a rate increase.
Last month, Bernanke said the risks of a “substantial downturn” had diminished and vowed to “strongly resist” mounting inflationary pressure. Many traders predicted the Fed would raise its benchmark-lending rate as early as August. Wall Street had priced in three interest rate rises from the current level of 2% to 2.75%, according to the Times Online.
But now, those same traders don’t think Bernanke will move before October at the earliest.
“Bernanke has changed his tune,” Kevin Logan, senior economist at investment bank Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd. in New York told the Times. “In June, he said that he didn't think it was all that bad. Now, six weeks later, he is saying that there are significant downside risks. He has basically been forced to face the data that has come out over the last six weeks, which shows that the U.S. economy is deteriorating.”
In prepared testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Bernanke said yesterday that the economy “continues to face numerous difficulties, including ongoing strains in financial markets, declining house prices, a softening labor market, and rising prices of oil [and] food.”
“Many financial markets and institutions remain under considerable stress, in part because the outlook for the economy and thus for credit quality, remains uncertain,” he added. “In general, healthy economic growth depends on well-functioning financial markets. Consequently, helping the financial markets to return to more normal functioning will continue to be a top priority."
Inflation’s Open Invitation
With inflation no longer the predominant priority for the Fed, the dollar will continue to weaken and inflation will engulf the economy.
“The Fed is downgrading some of their economic outlook for the medium term,” Carl Forcheski, vice president on the corporate currency sales desk at Societe Generale SA (OTC: SCGLY) in New York, told Bloomberg. “That translates to a continued postponement of any thoughts of rate hikes,” thus weakening the dollar.
The greenback hit a record low of $1.6038 against the euro yesterday (Tuesday), after the Labor Department reported that inflation at the wholesale level jumped 1.8% in June, after climbing 1.4% in May. Consumer prices likely climbed 4.5% in June, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg.
According to the Fed’s most recent economic projections inflation will be higher this year than previously thought, with prices rising as high as 4.2%. But with financial markets racked with uncertainty, it’s hard to tell how much further the dollar has to go.
“The reality is the U.S. housing market and credit squeeze haven’t hit bottom yet,” Takuma Kurosawa, global markets treasurer at HSBC Bank PLC (OTC: HBCBF), told Bloomberg. “That’s discouraging investors from holding dollar assets.”
Paul Robson, a currency strategist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (ADR: RBS) told the International Herald Tribune that the euro would hit $1.62 in the “near term,” but a sharp rise to around $1.65 would spur intervention by global central banks to support the greenback.
The diving dollar did little to save foreign markets, however, as fears about the U.S. economy infiltrated global markets.
In London, the FTSE 100 index fell 2.4%, while the Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50 index dropped 2.3%. The CAC 40 in Paris and the DAX in Frankfurt each lost roughly 2%.
In Asia, the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong fell 3.8%, taking its loss for the year to 24%, while the Nikkei 225 stock average fell nearly 2%.
News and Related Story Links:
- Money Morning:
As Treasury’s Paulson Prescribes Bailout for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Guru Jim Rogers Predicts an “Unmitigated Disaster”
Freddie Mac under attack
- Times Online:
Bernanke offers grim outlook for state of US economy