Start the conversation
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
A white paper on bank reform delivered to Congress and regulators last week by the Association of Mortgage Investors – the powerful lobbying group that represents huge institutional investors – warns that if the securitization market isn't radically reformed "it will be difficult if not impossible for capital market investors to return to funding economic activity."
What the report doesn't say is that banks – standing in the way of bank reform – don't want a simplified, standardized, and transparent securitization market, because that would revitalize free-market disciplines and undermine the control they exercise over the credit markets.
Right now, the stock market is discounting news about tight credit conditions. But analysts worry about an increasing disconnect between rallying stock prices and the hoped-for rebounds in consumer-driven growth and the U.S. housing market – both of which are struggling with a lack of access to credit. This disconnect is fostering fears of a stock-market correction.
Investors need to understand exactly what's at stake here. And they need to know how to protect themselves and – even more important – how to profit from the volatile-but-powerful capital waves that will result from this fundamental battle over our future.
Taking No Prisoners
What the big banks want is the socialization of their risk exposure and the privatization of their unbridled profitability.
And they are willing to hold the economy hostage to get it.
To achieve that goal, banks are concentrating their too-big-to-fail power so that the federal government has no choice but to backstop them – permanently lowering the cost of capital for these large lenders. And that's not all. To counteract the credit squeeze the concentration of lending power in too few banks fosters, the federal government will be forced to once-again back loan-level guarantees from privately owned, government-chartered guarantors – in other words, more government-sponsored entities (GSEs) such as Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE).
On March 23 – during a House Financial Services Committee hearing labeled as "Housing Finance: What Should the New System Be Able to Do?" – U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner was questioned about the future of the biggest insolvent GSEs, Fannie and Freddie. Those two – explicitly bestowed with unlimited backing by former Treasury Secretary Henry M. "Hank" Hank Paulson Jr., have by themselves so far siphoned $165 billion from taxpayers' pockets.
Geithner told a flabbergasted panel that there were no immediate plans to unwind the entities, stating that "realistically [speaking], it's going to take several months to do a careful exploration of the problems, solutions, alternative models, and to try to shape legislation that could command consensus."
Several House members were even more disturbed when Geithner told them that "my own view is there's probably going to be a good economic case [and a] good public-policy case … for some continued provision of a carefully designed guarantee by the public sector going forward."
In short, not only are Fannie and Freddie destined to stay with us, their gross failures have elicited a very-banker-friendly fix to their troubled existence – create more of them.
Repeating Earlier Mistakes?
At the same hearing, Mortgage Bankers Association Chairman-elect Michael D. Berman proposed that a new breed of mortgage-backed securities should be structured with a federally guaranteed wrap. The association wants the government to provide an explicit credit guarantee financed by risk-based fees paid into a federal insurance fund.
The hybrid proposal – a cross between the existing government guarantee that already backs Ginnie Mae securities and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) insurance fund that covers bank deposits – came with a fresh recommendation "that regulators charter enough entities to establish a truly competitive secondary market and to overcome issues associated with too-big-to-fail."
It doesn't matter to the Mortgage Bankers Association that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which backs its loan-level mortgages with a government guarantee and then collects and packages those mortgages into the Ginnie Mae securities, is itself insolvent. It also doesn't matter that Ginnie Mae securities are the only mortgage-backed securities whose principal-and-interest payments to investors are 100% government-guaranteed. Nor does it matter that Ginnie Mae is stumbling down the same blind path as Fannie and Freddie.
What matters to the bankers is that they don't have to assume any risk on the mortgages they originate as long as the government guarantees them. As long as bankers can generate fees from originating loans – and then offload those loans to investors as "guaranteed" – these institutions can go back and borrow additional cheap money from the U.S. Federal Reserve and leverage their balance sheets with the very same risk-free securities. Once that's done, the banks are positioned to reap gigantic profits, pay their top executives huge bonuses – and have plenty left over to spread across Washington in order to institutionalize their latest scheme.
Outraged critics contend that regardless of whether institutions are too big to fail, or that if enough smaller institutions are afforded the same socialized model, eventual contagion resulting from systemic risk concentration and integration will kill democratic capitalism. The point is that the market is no longer allocating capital, the government is.
A Real Blueprint For Change
There is a way to break the stranglehold banks have on the economy, and at the same time arrest moral hazard and unshackle free markets.
It's simple. Congress needs to immediately enact all 10 of the recommendations called for in the Association of Mortgage Investors white paper: "Reforming the Asset-Backed Securities Market." Those 10 recommendations are:
- Provide loan-level information that investors, ratings agencies and regulators can use to evaluate collateral and its expected economic performance over the life of the securitization.
- Require a "cooling-off" period when securities are offered so that investors have time to analyze them before making investment decisions.
- Make deal documents for all asset-backed and structured securities publicly available to market participants and regulators.
- Develop standard-pooling and servicing agreements with model representations and warranties as a non-waivable industry-minimum legal standard.
- Develop clear standard definitions for securitization markets.
- Directly address conflicts of interest of servicers that have economic interests averse to those of investors.
- Require the appointment of a suitably independent and qualified trustee to act for the benefit of holders of the securities.
- Make asset-backed securities subject to private right-of-action provisions of anti-fraud statutes in securities law.
- Encourage secondary trading on venues such as exchanges where trading prices are visible to investors and regulators.
- Make ratings agencies use loan-level data in their initial ratings and to update ratings as market conditions evolve and collateral performance is reported.
Of course, banks will oppose all these recommendations for various reasons, but mostly under the guise that they are too onerous and expensive to implement and would raise the cost of capital and impede market functionality.
Self-Protection Strategies
The truth, of course, is that every one of the recommendations cuts through the opaqueness, issuer protections and marked-up fees that banks enjoy when pooling, issuing and trading their purposely complex and asymmetrically divined instruments.
We are at a critical crossroads in the evolution of capitalism. We have manufactured enough rope to hang ourselves on the gallows of socialism. With the partisan and bitter battle over healthcare momentarily behind us, and after admitting that regulatory reform should have been U.S. President Barack Obama's No. 1 agenda item when he first took office, now is the time to act decisively.
The arguments against the protective and prudent regulations that safeguard investors and the economy are always made by those with a stake in circumventing those protections for personal gain. America has an unparalleled history of creating wealth, while adapting to unforeseen and unintended consequences of both good and bad legislation, as well as the unmitigated greed of usurpers and shysters. For the sake of the republic, democratic capitalism and our economic future, it is time to empower Americans to return the country to the top of the economic world order.
Investors can help themselves on an individual level. First and foremost, I recommend you follow and actively participate in the looming regulatory battles. Write to your elected representatives, letting them know where you stand. Place stop-loss orders on all your investments: If the bankers win the regulatory-reform battle, you will get "stopped out" when the market eventually crashes. At that point, take all your capital to China, because at least there they are honest about their government-directed, socialist-economic model.
[Editor's Note: Money Morning Contributing Editor R. Shah Gilani is also the editor of the brand new Capital Wave Forecast advisory service, and is scheduled to host his first conference call with subscribers at 4 p.m. today (Tuesday).
A retired hedge-fund manager and gifted analyst, Gilani regularly takes readers behind Wall Street's "velvet rope" – and into the world he knows so well – exposing the pitfalls that can inoculate investors against ruinous losses as he highlights profit opportunities that most other experts never even recognize.
His Money Morning columns, analyses and investigative exposés have been read by millions across the Internet.
With his new advisory service – The Capital Wave Forecast – Gilani introduces investors to the "capital wave" investment strategy, identifies the monster capital waves now forming, and demonstrates how to profit from the best opportunities these powerful market forces are creating. And he doesn't ignore risk: Gilani will make certain to highlight the market pitfalls that all too often sweep investors away.
Take a moment to check out Gilani's capital-wave-investing strategy – and the profit opportunities that he's watching these waves create in key markets around the world.]
News and Related Story Links:
- Money Morning Special Investment Research Report:
How Capital Waves Are Creating the Biggest Profit Opportunities in Today's Markets - Reuters:
U.S. mortgage investor rights must be heard, group says - The Baltimore Examiner: Press Release via PRNewswire:
Statement from Micah Green On Behalf of The Association of Mortgage Investors - Investopedia:
Double-Dip Recession - Money Morning News Archive Category:
Capital Waves - Reuters:
"Too Big to Fail" in Crosshairs of Reform Debate - Wikipedia:
Too Big to Fail - Wikipedia:
Cost of Capital
- Investopedia:
Mortgage-Backed Securities - Federal Deposit Insurance Corp:
Official Web Site - Mortgage-Bankers Association:
Official Web Site - Investopedia:
Moral Hazard
- Association of Mortgage Investors White Paper:
Reforming the Asset-Backed Securities Market - WhiteHouse.gov:
Barack Obama - InvestorGlossary:
Stopped Out
Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…
About the Author
Shah Gilani is the Event Trading Specialist for Money Map Press. In Zenith Trading Circle Shah reveals the worst companies in the markets - right from his coveted Bankruptcy Almanac - and how readers can trade them over and over again for huge gains.Shah is also the proud founding editor of The Money Zone, where after eight years of development and 11 years of backtesting he has found the edge over stocks, giving his members the opportunity to rake in potential double, triple, or even quadruple-digit profits weekly with just a few quick steps. He also writes our most talked-about publication, Wall Street Insights & Indictments, where he reveals how Wall Street's high-stakes game is really played.
mi found of FCDI /I DEMANDED MY FOUND
Hi
Author, you DO see the pyramid scheme symbol on the back of the USA one dollar bill, right? You DO see the servitude infestation in capitalism, right? And do you see the "pay up or lose your wellbeing" Chicago mob-like felony extortion widespread within capitalism? Do you see the "join or starve" felony extortion done to the 18 year olds… by this ugly competer's church called capitalism? See how forcing competer's religions onto 18 year olds… kills membership in the cooperator's church (Christianity/socialism)?? Do you understand that AmWay (American Way) (New World Order) got "the exclusive" (legal tender) on the TYPE of survival coupons (money) accepted in supply depots (stores) and leverages 18 year olds into the organization via that felony activity as well? (It puts AmWay-coupon slaving requirements called price tags… on all the survival goods). Do you understand how farmyard pyramids work… from your childhood?? Remember?? Upper 1/3 are "heads in the clouds" while the kids on the bottom ALWAYS GET HURT from the weight of the world's knees in their backs? Still with me? Do you see anything illegal, immoral, or just plain sick… in any of this pyramid scheme's activities?
Us American Christian socialists are still patiently awaiting the natural fall of the pyramid-o-servitude, or the busting of the free marketeers felony… by the USA Dept of Justice. Us Christians are VERY CLOSE to issuing a cease and desist order until the servitude and inequality goes away… which means it turns into a commune. Commune is a word we LOVE when used in the word "community"… but its one the caps HATE when used in the term "commune-ism". Go fig. PROGRAMMED!!
Do a Google IMAGE SEARCH for 'pyramid of capitalist' to see a full color picture made way back in 1911, when capitalism was first discovered to be a con/sham instigated by the Free Masons/Illuminati. Folks sure bought into the thing… hook, line, and sinker just the same. The caps didn't even check if a string was attached! Now THAT'S easy fishing, eh?
Time to level the felony pyramid scheme called capitalism. Abolish economies and ownershipism worldwide, and hurry. Economies just cause rat-racing, and rat-racing causes felony pyramiding. BUST IT, America! Look to the USA military supply/survival system… (and the USA public library system) for socialism and morals done right. Equal, owner-less, money-less, bill-less, timecard-less, and concerned with growth of value-criteria OTHER THAN money-value. Quit doing monetary discrimination immediately, and make it illegal. There are MANY measurement criteria of "value"… not just dollars. Try morals, efficiency, discrimination-levels, repairability, etc etc. Economies are cancerous tumors, and to cheer for their growth… is just insane. Profiting causes inflation, so if caps LIKE inflation, and if they LIKE a terrible time in afterlife when they meet the planet's ORIGINAL OWNER before caps tried to squat it all with ownershipism, then keep it up with the felony pyramiding. I dare you. While us Christians are finally bulldozing that pyramid scheme back to level, lets make servitude and "join or starve" (get a job or die) illegal in the USA, and lets level the architecture seen in USA courtrooms, too. Right now, USA courtrooms are church simulators or "fear chambers", by special design. Sick.
Isn't that back-of-the-dollar pyramid… a Columbian freemason symbol? And WHERE is the USA gov located? District of Columbia? (Not even part of the USA!) How much more blatant can ya get? The "Fed" runs a pyramid scheme called the free marketeers. If you're using the "federal reserve note" certificates, or using no-other-living-thing-on-the-planet entitles of ownership, you're bought into a servitude/slavery con/sham… called capitalism. Pyramiding 101.
Larry "Wingnut" Wendlandt
MaStars – Mothers Against Stuff That Ain't Right
(anti-capitalism-ists)
Bessemer MI USA
GO TO NESARA,,,,NOW……..
There is no turning back from the government control so omnipresent in our economy. More regulation did nothing to prevent Bernie Madoff, Ebbers and all the other crooks who were allowed to operate despite the oppressiveness of regulations in minor ways.
The campaign contributions from those with the most to lose will control how any type of legislation shakes out.
Internally, the current administration and its appointees believes the whole house of financial cards will come a tumbling down without the appropriate backstops and government guarantees, and on that point they are probably right since faith in our financial system is based on multiple Ponzi schemes and concocted statistics about inflation, unemployment and home sales. No one seems concerned about fairly reporting mortgage values on bank balance sheets and the real value of derivatives based on little but the paper they are printed on. If Fannie and Freddie were allowed to fail, Ben, Barack and Tim couldn't find enough printing presses to manufacture enough fiat money to address the consequences.
Similarly, interest rates needs to stay artificially low into the indefinite future with the type of debt the U.S. Government needs to float just to keep up with its out-of-control spending.
Ultimately, Congress will take the course of least resistance and continue to insert more government oversight as a means of demonstrating that they are taking "action," when they have no understanding of economics or what drives the private sector. More pork to more special interests means more votes and continued tenure in office.
Balance between free enterprise and onerous government oversight will not be found because it is so easy to make a scapegoat of the many greedy honchos (both private businesses and government insiders) who have raped, pillaged and plundered the public treasury.
Rick,
I do agree that government failures occur where beaucracies rule over free enterprises. However, you comment on Maddoff surely cannot assume that this was a result of over-regulation by the government. On the contrary, all the Maddoff-hearings have clearly shown that the government was refusing to regulate even when private folks tried to bring their attention to what Maddoff was doing.
To be sure, Maddoff's and the recent sub-prime failures are not the result of over-regulation of Wall Street but rather resulted from under-regulation and eliminating (by Clinton administration) the all important Glass-Steagall Act.
Something in my education went wrong. I thought capitalism describes a system where investors take risk. Boy, was I wrong! Obviously it is the case that the capitalists direct the government what to do or not to do. The judicial system is usually accomplice to that even though once in a while a judge gives me a surprise.
But then again, milking the system is easier than doing honest work. The latter is obviously what middle class people do and they are proud of it. To bad it does not get them anywhere financially.
I witness how the banks curb credit to regular citizens. The credit card rates are insane and the conditions for mortgage refinancing are prohibitive. It confirms the "golden rule": Who has the gold sets the rules.
The Wingnut tirade, entertaining as it is, erroneously focuses on a single aspect of the US economic system; the capitalist. Indeed that focus is further directed to the extreme edge of capitalism wherein abides the unconscionable capitalist who rightly should be castgated and expunged from the system.
But there are good capitalists (Read Will Baumol's 'Good Capitalist, Bad Capitalist') who work side by side with the other half of the US economic dynamic; the entrepreneur within the free enterprise system.
So whilst I can agree with Wingnut as to the greedy capitalist, let's direct our attention to him/her and put them in their proper place….
Hunh, and here I always thought that I was a system fighter and not a role-playing-people fighter. Well allow me to clarify. The problem with using economies and ownership… is a SYSTEMIC problem. Even if there WERE some freemasons who are still peddling "yay imperialism" pamphlets, the actual inventors of the free marketeers pyramid/order… are long dead of old age, I suspect. Its a tradition, now. A habit. A social more. An addiction. Its also "an exclusive" because only one type of coupon is accepted as legal tender.
In a narrow-view way, capitalism is not the real problem, as pyramid schemes of servitude/inequality (capitalism) are liable to happen with ANY money/ownership-based earn'n'deserve system. The real problem… is with the USING of economies/ownership (a man-made-up thing, animals/plants/fish are smarter than that). Notice the USA military survival/supply system? Commune. Everyone on the same team, helping each other survive, no money needed, luxuries in rec-services repositories to be shared by all, no ownership. Everything belongs to "team", but folks CAN become custodians of said "things". Same with USA public library system. Moneyless, ownerless. Not a single drop of monetary discrimination is seen there. Its a TRUE socialism or communism. Don't we just HATE the word "commune", though? And thus we must hate commune-ity, commune-ication, and commune-ion.
Call it communalism… ya won't get such a kneejerk bad-taste reaction, I suppose. Thanks for the comments, Ken. I hope I clarified. I'm not after the capitalists, I'm after capitalism. Notice the signature at the bottom. "anti-capitalism-ists" and NOT anti-capitalists. Take care!
Larry,
Your point about declaring "get a job or die" illegal in the U.S. is very well made. To me the "get a job or die" rule is the same as the "hunt or die" rule of the natural world. Like it or not Darwin's "natural selection" is nature's version of what we are trying to socially institutionalize under the so-called "free market" capitalist system. Fortunately, we have failed so far to go to the extent that natural selection works in the natural world.
The point is for society to move away from the law of the jungle and still incentivize the young and healthy to work hard and care for the new born, old and the weak.
Incentivizing folks has led us to the right to own. To the extent that we have even carved up surface of the Earth and 'drawn lines' sincerely believing in those lines. While air and water (and pollution) flows over and beneath those lines unrestricted we believe in those lines and die defending (or kill trying to expand) them. Lions, dogs and other animals do the same while creating and defending their so-called territories that they mark with their urine.
Again, I believe, we have to get away from blindly following nature and create our own rules where harmony and peace prevails. Nature, unfortunately, is not very peaceful if see a lion biting chunks of flesh off the limbs of a struggling buffalo.
I believe, to incentivize folks and to insure harmony we need to institute "user rights" and not "ownership rights". Employees of every corporation – even the 250,000+ employee Citibank – have user rights for their employees. Every employee uses, say, a PC provided by the corporation. The corporation insures that the employee is incentivized to use its property in proper manner. Corporations do not seek to incentivize employees by giving their employees the right to own the desks, the chairs, the PCs, the photocopiers & scanners, etc.
To conclude, I fully agree with your point about critically examining whether we really need the right of ownership. But to get away from it we do not need to seek justification in the way nature and natural cycles work. We, humans, need to go beyond simply imitating nature.
Mr. Ghosh…I agree with your Darwinian theory of capitalism. We are genetically structyured to weed out the "weak" in order to improve our survival. You would have us break out of our animalistic behavior thus improving the lot of all of us. The desire is laudable, but we can't…we are alll animals (in the natural sense) and we cannot be anything else. A sad fact, but true nevertheless.
From the piece: "The point is that the market is no longer allocating capital, the government is."
If the government is allocating capital, then the roles are reversed: That is, the banks are creating the money (capital) and the government allocating it.
The government, as it does do, should not borrow money created by the Fed (a private corporation) and, mostly, by the banks out of thin air, when they make loans. As long as legal tender issued/created/"printed" by the governing authorities is facilitating the effective production and distribution of goods and services throughout an economy/society, then inflation is not a problem.
We need to get thinking way outside the box and forget about these ideological isms. In deference to being succinct, innovation requires entrepreneurship and reasonable societal stability requires that the fortunate (used here generically) adhere to the following aphorism: the fortune of obligation is for the fortunate a deep understanding of the obligation of fortune. Also, size is a fundamental variable: those in the garages need, generally, to be left alone or maybe even assisted; organizations which grow so large that they control more resources and people's lives than some reasonably sized countries are a fundamentally different kettle of fish, just because of the size.
Material consumption is low-leveraged activity. I read two things with which my total agreement was immediate. The first was attributed to John Bogle and the second to Warren Buffett. The first: "I don't like to spend money." The second: "Most toys are a pain in the neck." I take both of them to be superficial statements of positions based on profundity. I am a "point-several-zeroes-something pennies to the dollar" person relative to both of them. It's poverty which is a, if not the, primary scourge of mankind. Succinctly, too many of the brightest of the world behave as predators and/or parasites. The best, by definition, behave as servers. The phrase best and brightest is usually misused. Intelligence not filtered through wisdom producers predators and/or parasites, not servers. Brightest has to do with st&sd (schooling, training and skill-development). Best has to do with education. Intelligence is to wisdom as st&sd is to education. Greedy bankers are predators and/or parasites: They extract far more of the productivity gains of real economy (make, mine, grow, provide services) than the services which they provide to it. Relative to the role which they should play, the one which they do play re the real economy is akin to the tail wagging the dog. Indeed, they create money out of thin air and use it, in part, for proprietary trading and, indeed, casino activity: At some point in time the exposure to derivatives was put at in excess of 10 times the GDP of the world!
As usual, another great piece from Shah Gilani. Always very insightful.
While I do admire his wisdom especially related to "market failures" and "government failures" I would like to make three points in connection with his banking reforms article.
One, to prevent another major failure of rating agencies to properly rate securitized mortgages we need to take the conflict of interest out of the equation. Just as in the drug industry we don't have a privately funded FDA to clear drug-sale and -use, we need a similar "toxicity rating agency" that is outside the free market institution. Such an agency's proper functioning will insure that democratic capitalism survives.
Two, I feel it is time to eliminate the rhetoric that opposes socialism to capitalism. There is nothing wrong if capital is mandated to serve society over profits for critical issues and for short durations. After all, what are profits for if they do not serve the larger interests of society? Surely, human civilization has a much greater mandate than those of corporations and governments.
Three, what amazes me is that the God-fearing public in the U.S. so much opposed to regulating markets to prevent their failures. If God, a perfect being, created this universe and regulates all its complexities, surely markets created by imperfect humans would need much more regulation. I hope the God-fearing American conservatives wake up to the need for eliminating the free-for-all from the marketplace. At the cost of being very anthropocentric, I would go to the extent of saying that, surely, we do not want the jungle to take over human civilization, and laws of jungle to dictate that we stop caring for the old, the new born and the weak.
History shows us that we've been forewarned by our fore fathers – very early presidents that we would see such a crisis if we ever allowed the money of our working citizens to fall into the hands of a few, namely the financiers – bankers. It's our money, we work for it and earn it; we need to have control of it back! The federal reserve entity isn't even a governmental entity, contrary to what many unsuspecting Americans believe. The fact that the word federal is in the name is misleading and deceptive and is the reason many believe it's governed or regulated by the government when in essence it is not. Can you elaborate on this for me. Thanks so much. I appreciate it.
stop these greedy pigs worlwide