Subscribe to Money Morning get daily headlines subscribe now! Money Morning Private Briefing today's private briefing Access Your Profit Alerts

Jobs in America: The Ugly Truth Behind Those Unemployment Numbers

More people have jobs in America this month than they did last month, so says the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

But the headline unemployment rate of 8.3% isn't the whole story.

It's not that there wasn't positive news. The addition of 243,000 new jobs far exceeded economists' expectations for an increase of 150,000. It was the seventh straight month of increases of 100,000 or more.

And yet buried in the BLS report are numbers that paint a different picture.

One of the main reasons the rate dropped, in fact, is because the BLS stopped counting nearly 1.2 million people as part of the labor force.

That's a record. It puts the labor force participation rate at a 30-year low of 63.7%, significantly below the long-term average of 65.8%.

While it's true the official number of unemployed fell from 13.1 million in December to 12.8 million, it helps when you simply don't include 1.2 million in the equation.

"This is not a fundamentally positive way to see the unemployment rate fall," Jason Schenker, president of Prestige Economics, said in an email to clients.

The labor force participation rate fudge isn't the only dim news lurking in the BLS numbers.
The number of long-term unemployed – those who have been without work for 27 weeks or more – remained stuck at about 5.5 million. That's 42.3% of all unemployed.

The "marginally attached" – people who want have searched for work in the past year but not the past month – category also remained steady at about 2.8 million.

But the number of underemployed workers – "part-time for economic reasons," in BLS-speak – increased from 8.1 million to 8.2 million.

A few more sobering statistics: America has 5.6 million fewer jobs than it did in 2008. And there are 462,000 fewer people working now than three years ago, despite a steadily increasing population.

When you add it all up, the prospects for jobs in America don't look quite so rosy.

"We still have a long way to go before the labor market can be said to be operating normally," noted U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke at a House panel hearing Thursday. "Particularly troubling is the unusually high level of long-term unemployment."

We've seen plenty of disturbing American jobs data just in the past week.

For example, a report from consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas said that planned job cuts rose 28% from December to 53,486.

And a report from payroll processor ADP showed that the private sector added just 170,000 jobs in January. That's well short of the 257,000 that the BLS attributed to private sector hiring.

Even reports from other parts of the government contradicting what the BLS is telling us.

The Congressional Budget Office this week said that based on current law and policies, unemployment will actually increase to 8.9% by the end of the year, and 9.2% in 2013.

And pollster Gallup Inc., which does its own tracking of the unemployment rate, reported that the general unemployment rate rose from 8.5% to 8.6%. And Gallup said the rate for the underemployed jumped to 18.7% from 18.3%.

"Regardless of what the government reports, Gallup's unemployment and underemployment measures show deterioration since mid-January," a report on Gallup's Web site says.

So while Democrats running for re-election – including President Barack Obama – now have some pretty statistics supporting their claim for more jobs in America, the crisis is not over.

"I wouldn't get anywhere near the champagne," Jared Bernstein, a former top White House economist now at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, told Politico. "That would be both a political and economic mistake."

News and Related Story Links:

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

  1. BENZETDUNCAN66@YAHOO.COM | February 6, 2012

    how are you

  2. Garcol | February 7, 2012

    Ever since Reagan's Dept of Labor changed the methods for caculating financial indicators and unemployment stats, the relation of actual employment to reported unemployment has been diverging.
    I have no problem with the discrepancy if I know it exists and I can correct for it.
    However, I do have a problem with the implication that this current president is somehow responsible for this discrepancy.
    In the time-tested manner of all administrations, statistics have been used to lie or bolster the truth -but in a partisan manner. Look at all the great economic successes under Bush II.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Some HTML is OK