Archives for February 2012

February 2012 - Page 7 of 11 - Money Morning - Only the News You Can Profit From

Mortgage Settlement Just the Start of Trouble for Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Friends

The biggest U.S. mortgage lenders, including Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), finally reached a $25 billion mortgage settlement to help homeowners – but the banks still face years of legal battles and billions of dollars in costs.

The provisions to the mortgage settlement include:

  • $5 billion total in cash penalties, payable to borrowers, states, and the federal government.
  • $20 billion in additional aid, through reducing homeowners' loan balances, and refinancing for underwater homeowners who are current on their loans.

Bank of America will pay an additional $1 billion to settle claims that it inflated appraisal prices from 2003-2009.

The multi-billion dollar mortgage settlement ends state and federal investigations into improper foreclosure procedures (like robo-signing), but banks can still get hit with criminal enforcement actions due to lending practices and mortgage-related securities.

"It's a big check with narrow immunity," Paul Miller, an analyst with FBR Capital Markets and a former Federal Reserve examiner, told Bloomberg News. "You get the state attorneys general off your back, but you're not getting immunity from securitizations, which could come with their own steep cost down the road."

To continue reading, please click here...

The Investment Lesson Behind the Kodak Bankruptcy

The recent bankruptcy of Eastman Kodak reminds investors they don't make companies like they used to.

Founded in 1892, Kodak shows that very few of these 19th century giants exist anymore.

Companies, like washing machines, just don't have the staying power they used to. Even the largest companies these days are unlikely to outlast a 40-year investing career.

The evidence for this increased corporate mortality rate is both substantial and startling.

According to John Hagel III, Co-Chairman of Deloitte LLP Center for the Edge and author of "The Power of Pull" (Basic Books, 2010), the lifespan of such companies is now about 15 years. That's a stunning change from 1937 when the average life expectancy of the companies in the Standard and Poor's 500 Index was 75 years.

A similar 1983 study of the 1970 Fortune 500 found the life expectancy of its companies to be around 40 years, with a third of them vanishing in the intervening 13 years.

Thus the progression from 75-year corporate lifespans to 40 and now to 15 since 1937 has been clear and more or less smooth.

To continue reading, please click here...

Three Glencore Xstrata Takeover Targets: TCK, AAL, FCX

The proposed mega-merger of Glencore International PLC and Xstrata PLC will create a global powerhouse with the potential to shake up the mining industry overnight.

If completed, the $90 billion deal will form a mining behemoth with control over one-third of the global market for thermal coal, and make it the world's largest producer of integrated zinc production. It will also rank as the world's third-largest copper producer and fourth-largest nickel producer.

Basically, the merger would create a super-giant that could compete with the industry's heavyweights – BHP Billiton Ltd. (NYSE ADR: BBL), Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RIO), and Vale (NYSE ADR: VALE) – the mining industry's "Big Three."

The merger is certain to spark volatility in the sector, according to Money Morning Global Resources Specialist Peter Krauth, an expert in metals and mining stocks who runs the Global Resource Forecast investment service.

"What observers need to understand is consolidation like this concentrates decision making," Krauth said. "The fewer participants in an industry, the more impact they have.

When output is either increased or decreased by one or more mega producers, it will also have a larger impact on world supplies, and therefore prices."

With that kind of power, the Glencore-Xstrata deal will form a goliath with the appetite – and the muscle – to swallow its weaker rivals.

Glencore Xstrata: Hungry for Mergers

Based on estimated 2011 results compiled by Credit Suisse Group AG (NYSE ADR: CS), the new company would have revenue of $211.3 billion and net profit of $7.5 billion. That kind of clout would make its stock valuable currency for more acquisitions.

Plus, both companies are led by aggressive chief executives that have a history of snapping up competitors.

Xstrata has been racking up spectacular growth through acquisitions, although lately it has focused on organic or internal growth to boost production by 50% by 2014.

Glencore, a trader of metals, minerals and oil, has said the main idea behind going public after almost four decades as a private company was to grab acquisitions.

Of course, the new company would have more going for it than sheer size and a forceful management team.

Glencore has a giant global intelligence network of 2,000 employees in about 40 countries. Many of them are traders and marketers that collect extensive data on what commodity buyers want and when.

"Glencore's network makes the CIA look like your grandmother's coffee club," columnist Eric Reguly recently wrote in The Globe & Mail. "It has been adept at forecasting commodity prices based on intimate knowledge of production, demand, regulations, political whims, transport costs and movements everywhere."

Glencore's intelligence network will likely direct it to takeover targets that have iron ore resources, an area where Xstrata currently lacks exposure.

The industry's Big Three control nearly 70% of the one billion-ton annual iron ore seaborne trade, along with contract pricing. Lately they've been dampening prices by flooding the market with iron ore, driving high-cost producers out of the business.

But their mushrooming market shares have triggered more regulatory reviews by concerned governments. That should clear the way for the new Glencore Xstrata entity to target smaller competitors without the Big Three interfering.

To continue reading, please click here...

Facebook IPO: How You Could Get Shares in the $100 Billion King of Social Media

For more than a year there has been rampant speculation about a Facebook IPO, and now one is finally on the way.

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, Facebook is looking at a deal that would value the company between $75 billion and $100 billion, WSJ reported, making it one of the biggest in U.S. history.

Facebook is looking to raise as much as $10 billion, which would make it the fourth-largest U.S. IPO behind Visa Inc. (NYSE: V), General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM), and AT&T Wireless. A $100 billion valuation would make Facebook worth as much as global powerhouse McDonald's Corp. (NYSE: MCD).

WSJ reported Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) would be the lead underwriter, a job that could give the firm more than $500 million in fees. [But that $500 million could lose 90% of its value if this government practice is allowed to continue. Major financial companies won't be the only ones threatened, either. This will hit everyone's investments – and could devour a huge chunk out of your retirement account. Take a look at our latest free report right here for details.]

A strong performance by Facebook could test the idea that social media companies are overhyped. But before you get excited about Facebook shattering that theory, you'd do well to look at some of the other hot tech IPOs of the past year.

Click here to continue reading...

Fuzzy Math, Greater Fools and the Facebook IPO

I have several friends who think the Facebook IPO is the next Microsoft.

I think it's more likely the next Research in Motion.

Or perhaps the next Sony, Kodak, or Eastern Airlines–all of which were once world-class brands that got sideswiped by hungry new competitors.

Facebook…you may as well buy a lottery ticket.

Don't get me wrong. In just a few short years, Facebook has accumulated an unprecedented 845 million users representing 12.07% of the world's population.

But does that merit an offering worth as much as $100 billion?

Maybe to a lot of people, but not to me.

Think about the numbers.

There are 7 billion people on the planet today, 5.15 billion of whom live on $10 or less a day. Of that group, roughly 3 billion people live on less than $2.50 a day.

That means if you remove those who live on less than $10 a day because theoretically they can't afford a computer or don't have enough disposable income to be monetized, that leaves roughly 1.85 billion potential Facebook users.

In a perfect world where a company could capture 100% of its target market, that would cap Facebook's potential user growth at 118.93%.

But we don't live in perfect world. As far as I know, no company has ever captured 100% of its target market. Not once.

To continue reading, please click here...

Will LinkedIn Corp. (NYSE: LNKD) Earnings Follow Groupon's Dismal Lead?

LinkedIn Corp. (NYSE: LNKD) reported earnings today (Thursday) that beat expectations, further distancing it from struggling Groupon Inc. (Nasdaq: GRPN) and raising the bar for competitors.

LinkedIn's revenue for the fourth quarter was $167.7 million, an 105% increase compared to $81.7 million for the same period the year before. That beat The Street estimate of $159.7 million.

Net income rose 30% to 6 cents per share or $6.9 million, up from $5.3 million a year ago, according to FactSet. Non-GAAP net income for the quarter was $13.3million or 12 cents per share.

LinkedIn had warned the fourth quarter could result in another loss due to costs of hiring more workers for new projects to grow its subscriber base. LinkedIn, however, usually gives conservative guidance and beats estimates, which it has done for the past few quarters.

LinkedIn Corp. (NYSE: LNKD) Gives Strong Guidance

LinkedIn scored half of total fourth-quarter revenue from hiring solutions, the services used to match up jobs and job seekers. About 30% of the total quarterly revenue came from its marketing business and ad sales, and the remaining 20% from premium subscriptions.

Those business segments' growth rates show their demand in the career networking universe: hiring solutions sales climbed 136%, marketing sales were up 77%, and premium subscriptions grew 87%.

LinkedIn also made strides in its international business, branching into growing markets that will have a bigger need for professional networking. It finalized three offices, one each in Japan, Brazil, and India.

For the current quarter, the company forecasts revenue in a range of $170 million to $175 million, ahead of the average $171 million estimate.

To continue reading, please click here...

Money Market Funds are in the Fight of Their Lives

Money market funds aren't exactly the safe-haven investments they're cracked up to be.

In September 2008, when Lehman Brothers failed, money market investors fled funds in droves, exposing investors and capital markets across the globe to huge systemic risks.

Now, to better safeguard investors and prevent the commercial paper market from shutting down in future crises, SEC chairwoman Mary Schapiro is proposing to re-make the money market mutual fund industry in the image of banks.

The SEC staff is recommending money market funds set aside capital reserves, as banks are required to do, and fund sponsors issue stock or debt to bolster their positions as a "source of strength," as bank holding companies are expected to do.

Also, the staff recommended restricting redemptions under certain circumstances and potentially requiring funds to collect upfront fees to further cushion themselves in times of trouble.

Industry leaders immediately attacked the plan as an assault on their business. They're threatening to sue the SEC.

The battle ahead isn't just about changing an industry.

It is about reshaping modern finance, the future power of regulators, and the real world implications of moral hazard.

Money Market Funds Explained

Money market funds are mutual funds. Investors who buy shares are pro-rata owners of the underlying investments that funds hold.

Money market mutual funds are restricted by SEC rules under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to purchasing only the highest-rated debt of issuing companies. They also invest in government securities and repurchase agreements.

The duration of the debt instruments they hold cannot exceed 13 months and the average weighted maturity of their portfolios has to be 60 days or less. Additionally, funds can't hold more than 5% of one issuer, except for governments or repurchase agreements.

The first U.S. money market mutual fund, The Reserve Fund, was established in 1971 to directly compete with banks for investor deposits. At that time "Regulation Q" prohibited commercial banks from paying interest on checking accounts.

Money market funds quickly drew in investors looking to earn interest on cash positions.

By September 2008, the size of the oldest money fund in the U.S., the Reserve Primary Fund, was $64.8 billion. Total industry assets were $3.8 trillion.

Anatomy of a Money Market Fund Panic

On Sept. 15, 2008 Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and everything changed.

To continue reading, please click here...

The STOCK Act: Lawmakers Forced to Admit They Must Obey The Law

Six years after the bill was introduced, the House joined the Senate today (Thursday) in approving the STOCK Act, which basically says that members of Congress must obey insider trading laws.

The House voted 417-2 to approve the STOCK Act; the Senate vote last week was 96-3.

You'd think that lawmakers wouldn't need prodding to obey laws that apply to everyone else, but their behavior has said otherwise.

By the legislators' own admission, an insider trading law shouldn't even be necessary.

Click here to continue reading…

Read More…

Ben Bernanke is Every Gold Bug's Best Friend

After prices fell 10% in December, many investors wondered if the bull market in gold was running out of steam.

That was before Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke swooped in with a "red cape" and fired the bulls back up.

Since the Fed reassured the world that interest rates will remain at "exceptionally low levels" for another two years, gold has jumped more than 3%.

UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) described the situation simply, "if investors needed a (further) reason why they should be long gold now, they got it yesterday … a more accommodative policy is a very good foundation for gold to build on the next move higher."

To gold bugs, two more years of near-zero, short-term interest rates means negative real interest rates are here to stay, and this has historically been a strong driver for higher gold prices.

Bernanke and the Fed aren't the only central bankers in the fiscal and monetary bullring.

Brazil has cut its benchmark interest rate a few times and China lowered its reserve rate for banks in December. According to ISI Group, 78 "easing moves" have been announced around the world in just the past five months as countries look to stimulate economic activity.

One of the main weapons central bankers have employed is money supply, which has created a ton of liquidity in the global system. Global money supply rose 8% year-over-year in December, or about $4 trillion, according to ISI. I mentioned a few weeks ago how China experienced a record increase in the three-month change in M-2 money supply following China's reserve rate cut.

Together, negative real interest rates and growing global money supply power the Fear Trade for gold. The pressure these two factors put on paper currencies motivates investors from Baby Boomers to central bankers to hold gold as an alternate currency.

To continue reading, please click here…

To continue reading, please click here...

How iTV and iPad 3 Will Push Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) Over $600

Even with its share price at a lofty $470, Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) still has startling upside potential, thanks to the iTV and iPad 3.

These younger iSiblings will provide the fuel to sustain Apple's amazing growth rates, which until now have been almost single-handedly driven by the iPhone.

The next version of Apple's tablet, the iPad 3, is expected to arrive in March.

But the product that's been getting the most buzz is an Apple-branded TV – nicknamed by pundits as the iTV. While unconfirmed by the company, most analysts believe the iTV is in the pipeline and will debut before the end of the year.

The added pop an iTV would deliver to Apple's bottom line, along with the iPad's continuing dominance of the rapidly growing tablet market, will make AAPL worth at least $600 over the next year or so.

"If Apple were to sell a TV, we continue to believe its margins and pricing could be industry leading given its vertical integration with content," Barclays Capital (NYSE: BCS) analyst Ben Reitzes wrote in a note to clients.

Toronto's Globe and Mail newspaper set off the latest wave of iTV speculation this week when it revealed that two of Canada's largest telecommunications companies, Rogers Communications (NYSE: RCI) and BCE, Inc. (NYSE: BCE) were in talks with Apple.

The Globe and Mail report added that both companies already had an Apple iTV in their labs.

Numerous rumors out of China in recent months have claimed that Apple's manufacturing partners are already gearing up for production of Apple iTVs.

The only snags appear to be the availability of the display screens in sufficient quantity and deals with content providers, which Apple has been working on for well over a year. But Apple is very good at resolving such problems.

Reitzes calculated an iTV could contribute $5.40 of earnings per share (EPS) to Apple's bottom line in its 2013 fiscal year. Reitzes puts Apple's total estimated EPS for 2013 at $48.46.

When you multiply that by Apple's modest price to earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.26, you get a stock price of $642.58. And keep in mind that the historic average for Apple's P/E over the past five years is 22.6. That math puts AAPL over $1,000.

Reitzes believes the Apple iTV will capture about 5% of the LCD-TV market, which is expected to sell 230 million units in 2012.

The Magic of iTV

Once in the market, the iTV will reshape the TV manufacturing industry, creating the same kind of headaches for competitors as the iPhone and iPad did.

"It appears that mainstream TV manufacturers are likely to be at least six to 12 months behind in the best-case scenario," Jefferies & Co. analyst Peter Misek told the Los Angeles Times. "Many of them lack the software and cloud capabilities as well as the innovative cultural elements to effectively compete."

So what will be so special about Apple's version of television?

To continue reading, please click here...