Start the conversation
Comment on This Story
Or to contact Money Morning Customer Service, click here.
There will be winners for investors as a result of the slow-motion split between Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Samsung Electronics (SSNLF), but the stocks to buy are neither of the warring parties.
Instead, as the tech giants unwind a relationship in which Samsung supplied Apple with billions of dollars' worth of components for its popular iPhones and iPads, the real winners are the suppliers rushing to fill the void.
The once-cozy relationship began to sour a couple of years ago when Samsung began to introduce smartphones and tablets that Apple felt too strongly resembled its own.
Shortly afterward, Apple began filing patent lawsuits. Samsung countersued. The fight grew into a global war, with 50 separate patent suits in 10 countries spread over four continents.
The relationship grew frostier in 2011 as Samsung became the dominant vendor of smartphones based on Google Inc.'s (Nasdaq: GOOG) Android operating system and started taking market share from the iPhone.
In 2012, Apple started shifting more and more component purchases to other suppliers, a process that has accelerated in recent months.
Samsung's invoices to Apple have included memory chips, batteries and display screens in addition to the manufacture of Apple-designed processor chips found in the iPhone and iPad.
Samsung, in fact, provided 26% of the component costs of the iPhone 4, so there's plenty of new money suddenly available at the Apple trough.
Let's take a look at some stocks to buy as a result of the Apple-Samsung divorce.
Stocks to Buy: Taiwan Semiconductor
One of the more recent deals Apple has made, and perhaps the biggest in the switch away from Samsung, is an agreement with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd (NYSE ADR: TSM) to fabricate the latest iPad processor chips, the A6X.
The deal eventually is expected to include the manufacture of other A-series chips for the iPhone and iPod Touch lines.
TSMC already manufactures about half of all the processors used in smartphones worldwide, so it clearly has the capacity and know-how to accommodate Apple's needs.
Credit Suisse analyst Randy Abrams said today (Thursday) that he expects Apple chip orders will contribute 5% of TSMC's revenue in 2013. Abrams upgraded his rating on this stock to "Outperform" from "Neutral" in December.
In the memory category, the winners appear to be a private company, SK Hynix Inc., Elpida Memory Inc. and SanDisk Corp. (Nasdaq: SNDK).
Elpida, which has a long relationship with Apple, is in the process of being acquired by Micron Technology Inc. (Nasdaq: MU). The acquisition will make Micron the second-largest maker of memory chips, behind Samsung, and one of the better stocks to buy in this group.
Research firm Trefis said this week that more business from Apple, both as part of the transition away from Samsung and rising sales of iPhones and iPads, presents "SanDisk with a huge opportunity to leverage Apple for growth going forward."
Finding stocks to buy among Apple's new battery suppliers is a bit more challenging. Starting in November, Apple replaced Samsung-supplied batteries in its iPad and MacBook laptops with batteries from Amperex, a subsidiary of Japan-based TDK Corp. (TTDKY), and privately held Tianjin Lishen Battery.
As for displays, The Wall Street Journal reported last September that for the iPhone 5, Apple dropped Samsung altogether in favor of screens from Sharp Corp. (ADR: SHCAY) and LG Display Co. (NYSE ADR: LPL).
Related Articles and News:
- Money Morning:
Six Ways to Win Big on Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) New iPhone 5 - Money Morning:
It's Apple vs. Samsung in a Fight for Mobile (Nasdaq: AAPL) - Money Morning:
Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) Patent War with Samsung A Fight No One Wins - Taipei Times:
TSMC posts record annual revenue - Trefis:
SanDisk Can Hitch A Ride From Apple's Growth In Mobile Devices - CNET:
Micron to buy major Apple supplier Elpida, takes on Samsung - ZDNET:
Apple drops Samsung as MacBook, iPad battery supplier: report - The Wall Street Journal:
Apple Cuts Samsung Reliance
About the Author
David Zeiler, Associate Editor for Money Morning at Money Map Press, has been a journalist for more than 35 years, including 18 spent at The Baltimore Sun. He has worked as a writer, editor, and page designer at different times in his career. He's interviewed a number of well-known personalities - ranging from punk rock icon Joey Ramone to Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Wozniak.
Over the course of his journalistic career, Dave has covered many diverse subjects. Since arriving at Money Morning in 2011, he has focused primarily on technology. He's an expert on both Apple and cryptocurrencies. He started writing about Apple for The Sun in the mid-1990s, and had an Apple blog on The Sun's web site from 2007-2009. Dave's been writing about Bitcoin since 2011 - long before most people had even heard of it. He even mined it for a short time.
Dave has a BA in English and Mass Communications from Loyola University Maryland.
Nice to know that the Apple-Samsung divorce is nearly complete, partswise that is.
Has anyone determined what the reliability factor of the new suppliers/vendors track record is/are/will be?
Samsung supplied, displays, memory, Application Processors, batteries etc, in previous generations of iPhones, iPods, iPads, Nanos etc, which gave Apple a durable, reliable and adored product world wide.
I have seen reports of display problems from non-Samsung manufacturers due to poor yields, leading to parts delayed for the iPhone 5.
My wife has purchased an iPhone 3GS, 4, 4S and 5. The iPhone 5 was the only one that was problematic from the time she opened up the box. The iPhone 5 had problems connecting to home WiFi and outside WiFi, but not at the Apple Store.
Complaining to Apple got her an appointment with the Genius rep, who reset her phone and sent her on her way, but the WiFi connection problem persisted. She complained to Apple again and Apple gave her a replacement (new) phone upon a second appointment with the Genius rep who stated that there was a batch problem with her iPhone 5 via the serial number.
Again the WiFi connection problems at home and outside became a nagging issue – I found that the iPhone 5 used IPV6, along with iOS6. Our router was IPV4, so I went to the expense of buying a new router which had IPV6 and her iPhone 5 works, miracously at home, but has still issues with outside WiFi – due to the iPhone 5 defaulting to IPV6. I have not asked her about iOS updates to see if the WiFi issues have been resolved, nor am I concerned about it.
Now that "NO Samsung" is a reality, what is the new cost of the Bill of Materials (BOM) for the new iPhone (5S, 6, etc), iPods, iPads, Nanos, Macs, etc. These new suppliers will definitely affect the costing of the BOMs for sure which will result in decreased profit margins.
How about future reliability of Apple products? What will their batch reliability numbers be?
My wife has been told (by me) that the next iPhone 5S, or 6? could contain reliability issues not seen in previous (3GS – 4S) iPhones. She should consider that also in her adoration to Apple simplicity and design – meaning I am not helping with her new iPhone problems.
What about the reliability, durability, and adoration of the No Samsung Apple products?