Start the conversation
Comment on This Story
Or to contact Money Morning Customer Service, click here.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Though we've come to expect no better from our leaders in Washington, the sequestration lies rank among the most blatant whoppers ever to come out of the nation's capital.
Sequestration, of course, is the $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts scheduled to go into effect at midnight Friday.
Instead of working together to come up with an alternative to replace the sequester, Republicans and Democrats have spent the past several weeks playing a maddening game of political chicken.
Both parties were counting on the fear of sequestration to force the other to cave before it happened.
Toward that end, leaders of both sides have tried to sway public opinion with exaggerations, obfuscations and outright lies.
Yes, business as usual in Washington, but an affront to U.S. citizens nonetheless.
Here are some of the biggest sequestration lies.
The 9 Biggest Sequestration Lies
- The Blame Game: Both sides have accused the other of being responsible for sequestration. President Barack Obama said it was Congress' idea; Republicans say it was the president's idea. According to The Washington Post's Bob Woodward, the idea did originate with the White House, but Republicans quickly endorsed it, and most GOP and Democratic legislators voted for it. So they're all responsible.
- Half Off: Although neither Republicans nor Democrats dispute the $85 billion amount attributed to sequestration, the spending cuts that will actually happen in 2013 add up to only $44 billion. The other $41 billion is money that is "authorized" to be spent in later years.
- They've Got the Power: Something else neither side likes to talk about is that we're not stuck irrevocably with the consequences of sequestration once the Friday deadline passes. Congress could pass a plan to address it the next day, or a week later, or a month later. The longer lawmakers wait, the worse it will be, of course. But both sides prefer the sense of panic the deadline has created.
- Think of the Children I: Education Secretary Arne Duncan said on Sunday's "Face the Nation" program, "There are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can't come back this fall." But when The Washington Post checked into it, it found just one county in West Virginia sending out transfer notices, and that action was not related to sequestration.
- Think of the Children II: The Obama administration has warned that 40,000 teachers could lose their jobs. The Post calls this "guesswork at best," since state and local governments have already received their federal money for this year. It would be months before any real impact from sequestration hits schools, giving them time to figure out ways to avoid many of the layoffs.
- You're Grounded: Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said last week that more that 100 air traffic control towers would close because sequestration cuts would force furloughs of air traffic controllers. But because federal workers require 30 days' notice, any furloughs could not begin until April at the earliest, and Congress could use that time to authorize funding to pay the controllers' salaries.
- Brace for Impact: Similarly, President Obama has warned that thousands of first responders will lose their jobs, federal food inspectors will be laid off, aid for the poor wiped out. But with the sequester cuts taking place over seven months – the remainder of the budget year – the impact won't be as sudden and dramatic as the Democrats have implied. Nor will the effects be as negligible as some Republicans have suggested. The truth is, no one knows for certain just how bad – or not so bad – the cuts will be.
- Just Google It: House Speaker John Boehner, R-OH, has said that President Obama "has no plan" to avert sequestration. Yet the official White House Website does indeed have a plan (though Republicans might not find it acceptable since it includes new revenues).
- Read My Lips: During the final presidential debate in October, President Obama declared that sequestration "will not happen." Whoops.
Related Articles and News:
- Money Morning:
What Does the Sequestration Mean for Investors? - Money Morning:
The Sequestration Follies: How Washington Outsmarted Itself - Washington Post:
Sequester spin gets ahead of reality - MarketWatch:
The sequester starts Friday. Then what? - RealClear Politics:
The Sequester Doesn't Cut Nearly Enough
About the Author
Dave has been a journalist for more than 35 years, including 18 spent at The Baltimore Sun. He has worked as a writer, editor, and page designer at different times in his career. He's interviewed a number of well-known personalities - ranging from punk rock icon Joey Ramone to Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Wozniak.
Over the course of his journalistic career, Dave has covered many diverse subjects. Since arriving at Money Morning in 2011, he has focused primarily on technology. He's an expert on both Apple and cryptocurrencies. He started writing about Apple for The Sun in the mid-1990s, and had an Apple blog on The Sun's web site from 2007-2009. Dave's been writing about Bitcoin since 2011 - long before most people had even heard of it. He even mined it for a short time.
Dave has a BA in English and Mass Communications from Loyola University Maryland.
Do we all agree that there is waste in government? Then the House should just let the sequestration happen. The small percentage of cuts across the board may hurt some more than others, but for those who have administered a government budget know that all the things that can be placed on the side, can be cut. This includes conferences, travel, administrative supplies, excessive end of the year purchases, bonuses, unnecessary contracts and pay raises. The govt budget and accounting system is wasteful as it allows those who spend all of their allotted budget and more in many instances to be more apt to get their budget request for the next year fully funded. Instead, those who save money through good management and don't spend their allotted budget should be rewarded with budget preferences for future budgets. The govt should find a way to carry forward funds that are saved which they say they cannot do today. The govt use it or loose it budget accounting rules must change. Just let the sequestration happen and see how cost efficiency will improve. Both the President and Congress wanted this and that is why it is happening.
I would allow tax reform to get GE(Immelt-Jobs Czar who meets once a year!!!) has to pay something) if and only if $ was used to balance ongoing budget(once we get one from Reid!!!). Problem is BHO thinks new revenue is to increase spending as he knows he is near end of ability to feed his voters(literally & figuratively). If he gets new revenue he thinks it is to increase size of government not reduce it!!!!!
what's the quickest way to get rid of all white house employees, including the president, together with all members of congress and put in some folks with common everyday sense and reasoning power??
Obama and his supporters must be praying for something really big and bad to happen that most people agree is caused by sequestration.
If nothing really big and bad happens directly caused by sequestration, it proves that it's OK to cut wasteful government spending a little at a time. (eg. the US Gov't program costing $120 million per year for advance study of Yoga)
I probably never come back to this site. What an irritating "The Morning Buzz" constant agitating for my attention just really pisses one off. SOOO, piss off.