I have such an intense enthusiasm for Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) that my collection of the company's products sounds a lot like the lyrics of a famous Christmas song: five iPhones, four wireless routers, three MacBooks, two Apple TVs, and one pair of iPads.
And while my love for the company's products is great, and would certainly be a factor, I can assure you that my analysis of the profit potential posed by Apple stock will be like any other recommendation I make - completely objective.
But with a polarizing "cult" stock like Apple, that's clearly not a claim that every analyst can make. You see, when I compare the current bull and bear stock-price predictions for Apple, I feel as if I'm reading about two completely different companies.
With Apple, it seems, there's no middle ground.
This intense disagreement is actually one of the factors that have been holding down Apple's share price. Coming, as it does, on such a high-profile stock, the tug-of-war between the opposing camps plays out in the headlines each day. And it's causing so much confusion - and outright frustration - that most potential Apple investors are sticking to the sidelines and are choosing to ignore the stock altogether.
That's unfortunate... because this stock is actually one of the most intriguing profit plays that I see right now - a big-name brand in turnaround mode, and a tech stock that poses less-than-average risk.
And as profit opportunities go, this is a big one.
I see two major catalysts here that are perfectly positioned to drive Apple stock higher.
Indeed, this has the double-your-money profit potential that we target for you here at the Strategic Tech Investor.
And when this stock rallies, the folks who listened to the bears will realize they'd been suckered.
A Tough Assignment
Sometimes it really stinks to be the guy who replaces a legend.
Jeffrey Immelt had to do it when he succeeded Jack Welch at General Electric. Heartley William "Hunk" Anderson had to do it when he followed Knute Rockne as head coach at Notre Dame. And current Apple Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Tim Cook had to do it by taking over for the late Steve Jobs, the Apple co-founder who later came back and turned the struggling firm into a consumer-gadgets powerhouse.
Under Cook, the Apple stock price has plummeted from the all-time record closing high of $705 a share set back in September 2012. In recent months, as the company continued to struggle, the buzz was that Cook was in well over his head.
I don't agree.
I keep a sharp eye on Apple and I think Cook is doing about as good a job as anyone could be expected to do after succeeding a legend like Jobs.
Jobs knew how to create products that could get hard-bitten tech veterans like me emotionally involved with machines in a way that few business leaders ever have.
Candidly speaking, no CEO I can think of could truly replace Jobs. Maybe Elon Musk, the role model for the "Ironman" movie franchise. Though brilliant, Musk is not an iDevice expert, and he's a little tied up right now running Tesla Motors Inc. (Nasdaq: TSLA).
And now there are signs that Cook is winning Wall Street over. At a recent price of $505, Apple's shares have already recovered 29% of its value from the closing low of $390.53 reached back on April 19.
The reason why I wanted to talk with you about Cook's tenure is this subject is an aspect of the five rules I've created to generate tech-investing wealth.
Rule No. 1 says "great companies have great operations." And great operations almost always start with leadership. Having analyzed Apple's performance during Cook's tenure, I believe the firm meets this rule's mandate.
Cook is also focused on improving value for the shareholder. Besides achieving high profit margins, he has set aside $100 billion for dividends and stock buybacks.
A Powerful Start
At the end of the day, a corporate CEO is no different than a baseball team manager or an NFL head coach.
They get judged on results.
And lately Cook's been getting some pretty good ones.
Take the two new versions of the iPhone that the Silicon Valley pioneer recently released.
Apple sold a record-breaking 9 million new iPhones during their recent introductory weekend. Those sales figures swamped the forecasts of industry analysts who had predicted unit sales of 5 million to 7 million.
The market research firm Localytics estimated that more than 75% of the launch sales were for the follow-on iPhone 5S model, with the remainder going to the much-maligned, plastic-cased 5C.
The 5C did pretty well in the U.S. market following its rollout. And those decent results flummoxed Apple's skeptics. You see, the 5C was supposed to be a "cheap" version of the regular iPhone, which has an aluminum case.
But now Apple has already found that its customers are flocking to the higher-priced (and higher-profit-margin) iPhone 5S, so it's already cutting back production orders for the plastic-housed phone.
But the 5C served its purpose: It allowed Apple to ramp up enough supply to avoid any shortages that would have robbed the company of sales and sparked customer and investor angst at a key juncture in the firm's post-Jobs period.
And the migration to the costlier phone helped preserve Apple's profit margins - enough so, in fact, that heartened Wall Streeters sparked a surge in the company's share price.
The iPhone, in other words, has recovered some of its "iconic" status.
And it looks like the company has, too.
A Billion Here, a Billion There
Although the successful iPhone launch has added some oomph to the Apple-share-price rebound, there was an earlier catalyst that first gave the stock its northward launch.
Here Are 10 “One-Click” Ways to Earn 10% or Better on Your Money Every Quarter
Appreciation is great, but it’s possible to get even more out of the shares you own. A lot more: you can easily beat inflation and collect regular income to spare. There are no complicated trades to put on, no high-level options clearances necessary. In fact, you can do this with a couple of mouse clicks – passive income redefined. Click here for the report…
About the Author
Michael A. Robinson is a 36-year Silicon Valley veteran and one of the top tech and biotech financial analysts working today. That's because, as a consultant, senior adviser, and board member for Silicon Valley venture capital firms, Michael enjoys privileged access to pioneering CEOs, scientists, and high-profile players. And he brings this entire world of Silicon Valley "insiders" right to you...
- He was one of five people involved in early meetings for the $160 billion "cloud" computing phenomenon.
- He was there as Lee Iacocca and Roger Smith, the CEOs of Chrysler and GM, led the robotics revolution that saved the U.S. automotive industry.
- As cyber-security was becoming a focus of national security, Michael was with Dave DeWalt, the CEO of McAfee, right before Intel acquired his company for $7.8 billion.
This all means the entire world is constantly seeking Michael's insight.
In addition to being a regular guest and panelist on CNBC and Fox Business, he is also a Pulitzer Prize-nominated writer and reporter. His first book Overdrawn: The Bailout of American Savings warned people about the coming financial collapse - years before the word "bailout" became a household word.
Silicon Valley defense publications vie for his analysis. He's worked for Defense Media Network and Signal Magazine, as well as The New York Times, American Enterprise, and The Wall Street Journal.
And even with decades of experience, Michael believes there has never been a moment in time quite like this.
Right now, medical breakthroughs that once took years to develop are moving at a record speed. And that means we are going to see highly lucrative biotech investment opportunities come in fast and furious.
To help you navigate the historic opportunity in biotech, Michael launched the Bio-Tech Profit Alliance.
His other publications include: Strategic Tech Investor, The Nova-X Report, Bio-Technology Profit Alliance and Nexus-9 Network.
DISAGREEMENTS @ MONEYMORNING
Keith-Fitzgerald has gone on record of taking a distinctly opposite view of Apple from yours in this publication. He does not think Apple will be able to maintain its profit margin or revenue growth, nor does he believe in their continuing ability to innovate and stay ahead of the competion, either. He sees Apple as the next Microsoft. Maybe its because he never bought Apple stock in the first place and held it. Keith prefers Asia, has family ties there, and sees "the grass is greener" over there, since they have the most greatest potential for future economic growth, and the low sovereign debt.
Yes it’s true that Keith and Michael disagree on both Apple and Microsoft. Actually, Shah likes both Apple and Microsoft, too. It does not happen often that our editors disagree on a stock, but clearly it does happen. Obviously you must read Money Morning closely to have even noticed – so thanks for being a loyal reader.
i think you ve been drinking the cool aid.. there was a point when apple was a leader. i don't see that now. jobs never counted on the fact that those that make the hardware for apple would ever become producers of devices themselves. he was also like microsoft dismissive of open source operating systems. you cant be free. and google with android like redhat and other linux gpl copyrights have blown them out of the water. i am sure you know that mklinux was the basis for osX..
though apple has a following of loyal users it is more a branding cult than technology wizz. its there competition that is coming to market with innovation.
to produce an iphone with the same or less in most cases battery life and to play catch up in screen size and features that samsung and other have had for years is not being a leader and forward thinker. there is a limit to the wizz bang candy you can put on a smart phone and we are about to reach that limit. at some point the ride will be over. remember sony , zenith, motorola. apple is not the only game in town. like tide you can only use the new and improved line so many times before people realize there being taken for a ride.