Subscribe to Money Morning get daily headlines subscribe now! Money Morning Private Briefing today's private briefing Access Your Profit Alerts

This Chart Will Save You from a Dangerously Popular Delusion

There's a very dangerous meme making the rounds.

It goes something like this:

The economy is improving, therefore the Fed's going to taper… and, when it does, the economy is strong enough to endure the withdrawals that will come with it.

Don't fall for it.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. Any amount of stimulus reduction will indeed trigger a "taper tantrum."

This chart is all the proof we need…

How the Fed Directly Impacts Your Money

The following chart is courtesy of Michael Cembalest, Chairman of Market Strategy and Investment Strategy for JPMorgan Asset Management via Forbes.

[Click Here to Enlarge]

You can see as clearly as I can that 100% of equity market gains since January 2009 have taken place during weeks when the Fed has purchased Treasury bonds and mortgages. Conversely, 100% of the declines have been during weeks when the Fed backed off.

Now, I'll parody screen legend Jack Nicholson's iconic line in "A Few Good Men"… some people can't handle the truth. So they argue that this is a short-term phenomenon or just random happenstance.

That's not true either.

Andreas Calianos, Chief Investment Officer at DomeEquities, did some truly great work in this department that's very similar to my own analysis, which is why I want to share it with you.

[Click Here to Enlarge]

Calianos found that the correlation between the S&P 500 and the average weekly dollar value of Fed-held securities from December 2003 to the week ended March 6, 2009, was a low 0.57. That's little better than random.

But from March 2009 onward, the correlation jumped from 0.57 all the way to 0.93 – meaning that there's nearly a 1 to 1 correlation between the weekly average dollar value of securities held by the Fed and equity prices.

If you've forgotten your basic statistics, 1 represents a perfect correlation, whereas a 0 means there's no correlation and the data doesn't seem to be related at all. But, again, we're talking about a correlation coefficient of 0.93, which is nearly perfect.

Ergo… you truly can thank Team Bernanke and the Fed for the $14 trillion 155% rally we've enjoyed for the past 5 years. While correlation isn't causation, you can bet there's linkage in this case thanks to the effect of liquidity that the Fed's buying has created.

So what's next?

That's hard to say, but if you thought 2008 was fun, stay tuned. I don't know when the next shoe will drop, but when it does it's going to be a doozy.

Legendary investor Jim Rogers puts it this way – and I am paraphrasing here – in several recent interviews that the reason why things will get so much worse the next time around is the amount of debt they've put into the system. Central bankers continue to float literally everything in an artificial sea of liquidity.

It's not for nothing that he's quick to remind people that the United States is now the most indebted nation in the history of the world – a point long-time readers know I am prone to hammer on as well because the Fed's activities are magnifying the causes of market instability rather than addressing the fundamental sources of the chaos that created it.

History is filled with examples of false booms where low interest rates create the illusion of savings that doesn't exist and that consumption is healthy when, in fact, it isn't. The Great Depression comes to mind, as does the tulip mania of the 1600s, when European coinage debasement created a continent-wide run on other assets. This should ring some bells if you've ever read Charles Mackay's book, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. If you haven't, I urge you to read it because it will help put what I am saying into perspective. Bear in mind that it was first published in 1841.

My position is basically this… the notion that our economy is strong enough to support a taper is very, very dangerous.

It's creating a sense of false security amongst market participants who can least afford it while quite literally giving the biggest trading houses yet another "get out of jail free" card for still further derivatives speculation – and yet another chance to fleece the public.

Here's What to Do as We Head into 2014

First, watch the central banks carefully.

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

About the Author

Keith Fitz-Gerald has been the Chief Investment Strategist for the Money Morning team since 2007. He's a seasoned market analyst with decades of experience, and a highly accurate track record. Keith regularly travels the world in search of investment opportunities others don't yet see or understand. In addition to heading The Money Map Report, Keith runs High Velocity Profits, which aims to get in, target gains, and get out clean. In his weekly Total Wealth, Keith has broken down his 30-plus years of success into three parts: Trends, Risk Assessment, and Tactics – meaning the exact techniques for making money. Sign up is free at

Read full bio

  1. H. Craig Bradley | December 16, 2013

    WIPE OUT ?

    My one big concern Keith is Janet Yellen gets up one morning and "unexpectedly" announces a "mini"- Taper or the equivalent. She can't be so stupid as to actually use the exact word "Taper" after what happened last May, can she? If she is that much of a government "box head", then its possible a market panic could develop under the right circumstances.

    Think of all the "glitches" (Facebook) that have happened in the last two years on the NASDAQ and other markets. I can easily imagine a market panic, provoked by the FED Chairman saying "Taper" in a crowded " Theater" and everybody selling like mad. Confirmations would be unobtainable, spreads would go wild, and it would take weeks to sort it all out. Meanwhile your trading accounts would effectively be frozen. See what happens then as the snowball picks-up speed, headed downhill. Wipe out!

  2. yngso | December 16, 2013

    What I´ve heard is that tapering will happen gradually. That doesn´t mean that there won´t be panic.
    I can afford not to sell, and hope that I will have "dry powder", cash, ready to buy when the dust settles.
    -But what about "Main Street", the real economy?

  3. Skip K | December 17, 2013

    I think this article is terrific. I intend to follow it's advise. I've been selling slowly, and on up days. I've sold stocks that have exceeded 25 and even 30 PE. I'm not sure who is on the other side of the transaction and what their investment thesis is.

    I don't want to time the top.

  4. Brad M | December 19, 2013

    I do not believe that there will be some extreme "taper mania". A certain amount of sell -off, sure, but no crash. The phrase and idea have been thrown around and discussed to the point of nausia, so I think people will accept the inevitability. Plus, the liquidity is already there, and there seems to still be a strong desire to get in the stock market, also, I don,t think the Fed will just suddenly quit the prgram all together, and the tapering could be very slowly staggered. If the market does correct badly, and I think it has to sometime in the 18 months, therewill be another trigger mechanism other than the Fed's tapering at the center of it. Inflation and increasing interest rates could put the breaks on whatever recovery we are currently experiencing.

  5. estephen B esteve | December 24, 2013

    ladies and gentlemen,and good afernoon to each every one of you merry christmas to all of you…and happy weekend.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Some HTML is OK