As the Mobile Payments War Dawns, Watch Out for These Losers

Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) launched Apple Pay last week, and it has already achieved more than any mobile payments system before it...

Apple Pay has people taking mobile payments seriously.

"Apple Pay will forever change the way all of us buy things," Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said as he introduced the feature last month.

Now, that won't happen overnight. And Apple Pay won't be alone. But make no mistake: The transition to mobile payments has payments

Mobile payment transactions in the United States alone totaled $1.59 billion last year. They will more than double in 2014 to $3.5 billion, according to research firm eMarketer. They'll more than double again in 2015 to $8.95 billion.

By 2018, eMarketer projects that U.S. consumers will make $118 billion in mobile payments.

Numbers like that are attracting a lot of powerful companies to fight over the spoils. Big profits await the winners.

This war matters to investors, too. Picking a winner will mean big gains. Picking a loser means missing out. The sooner investors sort out who's who, the sooner they can start profiting from mobile payments themselves.

We've already analyzed this trend and, even this early in the war, have spotted several winners and losers.

Let's get started.

The Mobile Payments War Is Here

The mobile payments shift will be complicated by bones of contention: fees and data.

Credit card companies and the banks that issue those cards make billions on usage fees. They want to find a way to keep that money coming as consumers shift to mobile payments.

Retailers don't want the fees. Retailers, along with certain big tech companies like Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG, GOOGL), want a mobile payments system that collects extensive data on shoppers.

Looking at these factors - even though it's early in the game - some winners and losers are already apparent. Here are the main mobile payments losers:

Mobile Payments Loser No. 1: CurrentC. CurrentC is a mobile payments alternative backed by a group of major retailers. Members include heavy hitters like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT), Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT), CVS Health Corp. (NYSE: CVS), and Best Buy Co. Inc. (NYSE: BBY).

Set to launch in 2015, CurrentC is a move by the retailers to bypass the credit cards and their fees.

Since Apple Pay went live Oct. 20, several of these retailers have refused to accept Apple Pay, even though many have the NFC-enabled terminals to do so. That's because the CurrentC group requires members to shun any competing mobile payments technology. The retailers also don't like Apple Pay because it incorporates credit cards and collects no customer data.

But CurrentC is doomed, no matter what Apple Pay does.

The system requires customers to surrender their Social Security numbers, bank account information, and driver's license numbers. CurrentC will also collect a lot of customer data, including health data.

Oh, and much of that data will be stored in the cloud. Yikes.

If that's not enough to send people running in the opposite direction, CurrentC will also be harder to use than Apple Pay.

Customers will need to: 1) unlock their phone; 2) open the CurrentC app; and 3) steady their phone to scan a QR code.

With Apple Pay, you simply whip out your iPhone and press the Touch ID button.

"For these reasons, we predict CurrentC is going to be dead on arrival. It's worse than using a credit card, and it's creepy," writes Business Insider Tech Editor Jay Yarrow.

Here's how this will play out: As consumers ignore CurrentC and iPhone owners demand the stubborn retailers offer Apple Pay, one or more CurrentC members will break ranks. After one of them cracks and takes Apple Pay (and most likely an Android-based alternative as well), the others will quickly follow.

Mobile Payments Loser No. 2: POS Terminal Manufacturers. Some pundits see the mobile payments phenomenon as great news for the companies that sell the POS (point-of-sale) terminals to the retailers and restaurants.

That includes VeriFone Systems Inc. (NYSE: PAY), France-based Ingenico SA (OTCMKTS: INGIY), and NCR Corp. (NYSE: NCR).

Few outlets have upgraded to the NFC technology, or to the new EMV technology. That's the one all the credit card companies are racing to adopt to prevent data breaches like the one at Target last fall. So they will need to buy new POS terminals.

Sounds like a win for the POS terminal companies, right?

In the short term, it probably will be. But as the shift to mobile payments continues, the picture will get much darker.

Already many smaller businesses use add-on devices from companies like Square to turn smartphones and tablets into mobile POS terminals. By next year, analysts predict retailers will snap up some 3 million tablets annually for use as mobile POS terminals.

"Traditional POS terminals will be replaced (or never bought at all) and traditional players, who don't adjust, will see their market share erode," writes Karen Webster, an expert on payment systems and the CEO of Market Platform Dynamics.

Now investors know which companies to avoid. Tomorrow we'll look at the winners.

[epom key="ddec3ef33420ef7c9964a4695c349764" redirect="" sourceid="" imported="false"]

Another reason to like Apple: The Apple Watch, when it formally debuts next year, will not be the first smartwatch on the market. But it has something no other smartwatch has, and will be very difficult to copy. This is going to give Apple a huge advantage in wearable tech...

Follow me on Twitter @DavidGZeiler.

Related Articles:

About the Author

David Zeiler, Associate Editor for Money Morning at Money Map Press, has been a journalist for more than 35 years, including 18 spent at The Baltimore Sun. He has worked as a writer, editor, and page designer at different times in his career. He's interviewed a number of well-known personalities - ranging from punk rock icon Joey Ramone to Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Wozniak.

Over the course of his journalistic career, Dave has covered many diverse subjects. Since arriving at Money Morning in 2011, he has focused primarily on technology. He's an expert on both Apple and cryptocurrencies. He started writing about Apple for The Sun in the mid-1990s, and had an Apple blog on The Sun's web site from 2007-2009. Dave's been writing about Bitcoin since 2011 - long before most people had even heard of it. He even mined it for a short time.

Dave has a BA in English and Mass Communications from Loyola University Maryland.

Read full bio