Despite a seemingly endless series of interviews, congressional hearings, and even an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Hillary Clinton still hasn't given adequate answers to many of the questions surrounding her email scandal.
But now the Democratic presidential nominee has no choice...
Last month a federal judge ruled that Hillary Clinton must provide written responses - under oath - to 25 questions from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch regarding her private email server and use of a personal BlackBerry device during her tenure as secretary of state.
"Secretary Clinton has never testified under oath why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are unsworn," Judicial Watch said in court filings.
Don't Miss: Subzero: How Negative Interest Rates Will Finally Kill America's Free Market
The 25 questions are part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in 2013 by Judicial Watch and reopened last March. That suit sought to obtain all records of the contracts between Clinton aide Huma Abedin and the State Department.
Those records became entwined in the larger Clinton email scandal. Judicial Watch argued only Hillary Clinton could provide the answers to certain specific questions, and U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan agreed.
The judge gave Clinton 30 days to respond after Judicial Watch submitted the questions, which the group did on Aug. 30, 2016. That means Clinton must respond by the end of September -- just a little over four weeks before Election Day.
"Judicial Watch will get Clinton under oath regarding the setup of her outlaw server - something no other person, organization, or agency has been able to do, to date," Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch's Director of Investigations, told FOX News.
Here's the full list of 25 questions Judicial Watch has posed to Hillary Clinton...
[mmpazkzone name="in-story" network="9794" site="307044" id="137008" type="4"]
Next Up: The Donald Trump campaign has pulled several disturbing pages from two 1968 campaigns. His strategy recalls both President Richard Nixon -- the "law-and-order" candidate -- and third-party segregationist candidate George Wallace. The comparisons don't reflect well on the billionaire...
Follow me on Twitter @DavidGZeiler or like Money Morning on Facebook.
Related Articles: