Markets:
DJIA --177.260.57%
NASDAQ --114.140.87%
S&P --27.290.72%
Featured Stocks:
MAXR +4.49% 48.65
BNED -4.15% 5.31
WMT -1.59% 144.64
KBH +1.33% 35.76

Market Timing

Article Index

The Best Strategy for Timing the Market Today

By , Associate Editor, Money Morning -

With the current economic uncertainty across the globe causing turbulent markets, timing strategies have never been more important to trading success.

While timing the market is not a sound strategy for long-term investing, short-term trading can see large profit boosts when the strategies are used properly.

Our research has uncovered one of the best strategies for timing the market today...

The Best 2017 Market Timing Strategies

By , Associate Editor, Money Morning -

Market timing strategies

High volatility and historically high markets make 2017 marketing timing an important part of your trading strategy.

While market timing isn't a good strategy for long-term investing, short-term trades can produce significantly more profit by timing the market.

Our guru has over 30 years of experience in options trading and has developed a safe and effective way for you to time the markets this year...

The Nobel Prize for Market Timing Goes to… Cliff?

By , Editor, Permanent Wealth Investor -

According to the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), the best - and perhaps only - way to outperform the market over time is simple:
First, claim that beating the market over time is virtually impossible. Then, take home $1.2 million for "proving" it.
That was Professor Eugene Fama's approach, anyway, after co-winning the Nobel Prize in economics.
Don't get me wrong. As a professional investor and portfolio manager, I believe Professor Fama's EMH has many valid ideas. But fundamentally, people like us (and Buffett, and Soros, and Rogers, and Lynch, and Einhorn, and Paulson, and Icahn, and Ackman) never swallow EMH whole.
Ironically, neither does Clifford Asness.
Why would one of Fama's brightest students decide to ditch EMH, and pick stocks and time the market instead?

Proving EMH "right" may be worth millions (to Fama). But proving it "wrong" is worth billions..