Start the conversation
Comment on This Story
Or to contact Money Morning Customer Service, click here.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Facebook Inc. (Nasdaq: FB) stock has been logging impressive gains, up nearly 24% year to date and an astonishing 172% in the past year. And the company's strategic acquisitions continue to bolster investor confidence.
But a recently published study could erode Facebook users' trust – and raises concerns about privacy all over again.
Facebook tweaked the content mix in the news feeds of close to 690,000 (unsuspecting) users for one week in early 2012. Some members were flooded with more positive posts, while others were shown more negative posts.
Researchers from Cornell University, the University of California, San Francisco, and Facebook then analyzed more than 3 million posts containing over 122 million words. Using an algorithm, they characterized the language as either positive or negative.
The study found that users shown more negative content were more apt to share negative posts, whereas users in the positive group showed a tendency to share more upbeat posts.
In short, Facebook was able to alter the emotional state of its users.
Here's why some believe the study, and Facebook, crossed a line – and what this development means for FB stock…
The Scandal that Never Was
This incident occurred two years ago! Nobody cared then, nobody really much cares today. Its just some "noise". If you like Facebook and Mark Zuckerman, then you like them. If you don't like Facebook or use social media, then you don't own it presumably. The quality of corporate leadership is such that this is not the least bit surprising to me.
The fact so many investors "like" Facebook is equally no mystery. After all, voters still like President Obama. People like lots of things I don't. That's no surprise either. Crowds all like the same things and have the same poor taste. They always will and I always won't. Who cares? Sure not me.