When U.S. President Richard M. Nixon announced on Aug.15, 1971 that the United States would no longer adhere to the gold standard - the mechanism that fixed the U.S. dollar's value to that of gold − the move was cheered.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped nearly 4%, and The New York Times gushed, "We unhesitatingly applaud the boldness with which the President has moved."
But now, 40 years later, there is a new gold-standard debate and the decision is being examined anew.
Proponents say the move had to be made, since the gold standard needlessly restricted the U.S. Federal Reserve's ability to manage the money supply, particularly during times of economic distress.
To critics, however, the once-heralded decision has lost much of its former luster. They say that abandoning the gold standard has served only to devalue the dollar, making everything else comparatively more expensive.
Here at Money Morning we've talked about the implications of the gold standard debate, as well as how our readers can capitalize on gold as a safe-haven investment - especially given the "yellow metal's" ever-increasing value versus the dollar.
Since the dollar became a "floating" currency 40 years ago, it has plummeted in value against gold. In 1971, a dollar was worth 1/35 of an ounce of gold; today it is worth about 1/1,750 of an ounce.
A return to the gold standard "would solve the unemployment problem, because expensive capital makes people use more labor," Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson said recently. "And it would indeed enforce fiscal discipline."
The gold-standard debate is a topic that we've studied here at Money Morning - as part of our ongoing analysis of the ever-changing global-investing environment. On this auspicious anniversary, we're making these reports available to you from our archives, free of charge.
For instance:
News and Related Story Links: