Editor’s Note: This special report – the First Installment of a Two-Part Story – originally ran Friday. But since many subscribers were unable to access the story due to a technical problem, we’ve included it again as part of today’s broadcast. Part II will run tomorrow (Tuesday).
If you’re a global investor looking for global profits – including one potential way to double your money – you need to “Hit the BRICs.”
Back in 2003, the Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) – eager to push its clients toward emerging markets investment – created the acronym “BRIC” to stand for Brazil, Russia, India and China, the four emerging markets the investment bank’s strategists believed would become a dominant part of the world economy in the years ahead.
What started as a marketing ploy is now a profit play that global investors have to consider, since at least three of the four countries – Brazil, China and India – feature sound economies with powerful growth rates, and stock markets with reasonable valuations.
In fact, China and India are two of the fastest-growing investable economies on the planet, and have been transformed into global leaders in both the manufacturing and service sectors. At the same time, Brazil and Russia each has become a cornucopia of commodities, and are emerging as global leaders in the white-hot global energy sector.
These newfound global strengths have provided all four of these countries access to massive amounts of capital, a key element of the investing methodology in both Money Morning and The Money Map Report.
With foreign reserves of $1.68 trillion, China basically has all the capital it needs for the development projects it has on the drawing board. India has nearly $300 billion in foreign capital invested in its stock market; and that virtually guarantees it will remain on global investors’ radar screens for the foreseeable future.
After conducting this analysis, we decided to develop “The BRIC Report,” a periodic feature we’ll use to update you on both the latest developments, and the latest profit plays, in each of the BRIC economies and BRIC stock markets.
While the BRIC countries are by no means the world’s only attractive emerging markets – from time to time, in fact, the BRIC markets may become overpriced or their growth prospects may ebb – over the long haul, these markets remain strong opportunities for investors, and should remain at the top of your list of profit plays. Here are the four top factors why this is true.
Let’s take a look at the markets one at a time.
Bullish on Brazil
Having had its debt rating raised, Brazil is in the same position as an individual who gets a new job, pays off some debt and discovers the credit card companies suddenly all love him. It’s a heady position, and highly profitable for Brazilian companies, provided the government doesn’t go on a spending binge.
When Brazil was included in the “BRIC” group in 2003, it didn’t deserve the distinction. Long-term growth since the 1970s had averaged less than 2% annually per capita, and the country had narrowly avoided bankruptcy in 2002. Long-term interest rates were above 20% – around 15% in real terms – which hardly encouraged companies to make capital spending commitments that could provide a badly needed boost to Brazil’s flagging economy. Most alarming, a left wing socialist named Luis Inacio “Lula” da Silva had just been elected president.
Brazil got lucky. First, President Lula proved to be surprisingly moderate, perfectly willing to welcome foreign investment and not at all like his socialist neighbor, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Probably more important, it was in 2003 that energy and commodity prices began the long climb that has brought them to their current astronomical levels. Since Brazil was not an oil exporter, there was no one single source of new wealth that the government could seize. Instead, revenue flowed to mining companies, the oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA (usually referred to as just Petrobras) (ADR: PBR) and numerous agri-business operations.
Most startlingly, Brazil’s ethanol program, which had been a hopeless boondoggle for a generation since it started during the oil crisis of 1979-82, suddenly became the envy of the world. Rising oil prices made Brazilian sugarcane the world’s cheapest and most economically and ecologically efficient source of newly fashionable ethanol. Back when oil was trading at $20 per barrel, the ethanol-from-sugar program was a typical example of misguided Third World government planning. But now that oil’s pushing $130 a barrel, it’s a bonanza.
Brazil’s current growth rate is around 5% – but the Brazil of today is far more balanced and stable than in its 1970s version, even though growth back then was an impressive 10%. Brazil’s improving credit position is likely to allow today’s growth rate to persist. Besides, political risk appears minimal: When President Lula leaves office, a politician of the center-right could well replace him.
Another good sign for Brazil – there are more than 30 Brazilian companies with full American Depository Receipt (ADR) listings on the New York Stock Exchange, plus 40 or even 50 more traded on the over-the-counter market. Here are a few of the more-attractive examples you might want to consider:
Reticent About Russia
As long as world oil prices keep increasing, or at least remain high, Russian energy companies will keep generating record profits. If that happens, count on Russian consumers to keep enjoying he resultant bonanza, thanks to spin-off benefits that will boost consumer-sector profits (leading to the creation of products that consumers actually can buy). However, Russia is the least sound of the BRIC economies, and is the one that I would least like to be invested in over the long term.
Politically, Russia has pretty much reverted to the pre-1991 Soviet system.
Today, just like then, there’s only one real party: The United Russia party, which controls 315 of the 450 seats in the Duma (essentially the lower house of parliament) and whose leader is one Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. There is considerable censorship of the media, and dissident reporters and editors have a habit of disappearing - not that there are many left now. There is huge emphasis on military power, and on throwing Russia’s weight around in foreign policy.
There is, however, a significant economic difference from the pre-1991 Soviet Union: While the state still controls most property, it does not control all of it as before.
Another difference: Before 1991, Politburo members were relatively impoverished and notorious for their lack of fashion sense and trademark baggy Soviet suits; these days the top brass, and especially Putin, are telegenic, snappy dressers with broad wardrobes of Italian clothes – and hefty bank accounts to match.
Economically, the Putin regime has produced huge economic growth – averaging nearly 10% per annum since 2000, including growth of 8.1% in 2007. A certain percentage of this was a “dead cat bounce” from Russia’s debilitated state in 1998-99, while some was the effect of a Reaganesque tax reform passed in 2001, which produced a “flat tax” income tax system at a rate of 13%.
Since 2004, Russia’s economic growth has been almost entirely driven by high oil prices. With Putin’s partial seizure of the Royal Dutch Shell PLC (ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B) concessions in 2006 and the BP PLC (ADR: BP) properties earlier this year, it’s become obvious that the Russian state will control all economic activity in the energy sector. As a result, output has now stopped increasing; in the first quarter it actually declined slightly. New Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has announced an ambitious target of expanded output, but I remain skeptical that Russia will achieve this with its government-dominated economic system.
However, if you still find Russia alluring, you need to keep certain things in mind. Most important of all, remember that this is a highly speculative market, and you should be ready to sell if U.S. interest rates are raised, which could well signal that commodity and energy bubbles are up for a tumble. But since Russia is primarily a play on energy prices, two of the three suggestions are energy companies:
[Editor’s Note: Look for Part II of this “Special Report” tomorrow (Tuesday).]
News and Related Story Links: