Start the conversation
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Yesterday's announcement by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) that it lost $2 billion on a "hedge" position is not only surprising, it's frightening.
I'll try and make this short and easy to understand, but the truth is that it's complicated. If we have a decent idea about what happened (and I do), it's bad. And if it's a tip-of-the-iceberg thing (which I don't believe it is), it could be really, really bad.
Investors put on hedges all the time. In fact, in our investment services like the Capital Wave Forecast we put on essentially the same type of "economic" hedges that JPM CEO Jamie Dimon is saying blew up on them. The economic hedges we put on are essentially hedges against long positions we hold.
For example, if I see some potential danger ahead, then I recommend we buy some protection, like buying the VIX in anticipation of rising volatility, or buying puts on broad market indexes.
The broad protective measures we take are economic hedges because they are not specific hedges designed to hedge potential loss in any one position. For example, if we owned JPM stock and we wanted to hedge our position, we might buy puts on JPM, or sell calls, or employ another specific hedge against our long position.
Personally, one of my favorite hedging tactics regarding specific positions is to not hedge it at all, but to sell the position outright. Needless to say, there are times when taxes, dividend payouts, and other factors make specific hedging prudent.
Back to economic hedging…
JPMorgan had on an economic hedge against what they thought was going to be an adverse (to their net positions across the bank) movement. It wasn't a specific hedge.
The problem is that they blew the hedge, big time.
We'll find out more in the coming days about what really happened (maybe), but I know they had on a massive arbitrage, or spread-type, position in the credit derivatives markets.
What's important to know is, what were they really doing? Where they "hedging" or betting with house money? Okay, I'll answer that for you. They were betting.
It's impossible to put on an economic hedge that size and not have it be a directional or spread bet.
It was a bet that went bad.
Related Articles and Links:
- Money Morning:
Mobile Wallet Technology Will Make You Rich - Money Morning:
Subprime Student Slaves: The Lowlife Trap of Higher Education - Money Morning:
The Markets Are About to Tell You Something - Money Morning:
The Banks Win, Again
Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…
About the Author
Shah Gilani is the Event Trading Specialist for Money Map Press. In Zenith Trading Circle Shah reveals the worst companies in the markets - right from his coveted Bankruptcy Almanac - and how readers can trade them over and over again for huge gains.Shah is also the proud founding editor of The Money Zone, where after eight years of development and 11 years of backtesting he has found the edge over stocks, giving his members the opportunity to rake in potential double, triple, or even quadruple-digit profits weekly with just a few quick steps. He also writes our most talked-about publication, Wall Street Insights & Indictments, where he reveals how Wall Street's high-stakes game is really played.
I have been trading RARS for a while now. I got alerted well before the volume started to pick up and because of this I was able to score a nice profit a few times. The report helped me understand the complete scenario and the pros and cons. It’s always best to buy before everyone else does. Check it out at vippennystocksite.com (Kindly, copy and paste the link in to your browser.)