Jim Grant and the GOP Joining Forces to Bring Back the Gold Standard

Email

With two GOP presidential candidates saying they'd add legendary Wall Street pundit Jim Grant to their administrations, bringing back the gold standard clearly has moved up on the Republican agenda.

Ron Paul, for whom returning to the gold standard has been a decades-long crusade, has said he would name Grant chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve. In his case, that would be a compromise – Paul has often called for the Fed to be abolished altogether.

Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich has promised to appoint Jim Grant to head a commission to study the possibility of going back to the gold standard.

Grant, who publishes Grant's Interest Rate Observer, is a well-known gold bug and critic of the Fed.

His ideas have attracted increasing favor in a party that blames the Fed's easy money policy for the country's economic problems.

Grant calls the current system of fiat currency an "anachronism" and questioned the "command and control, top-down system of having a handful of people at the Fed dictate interest rates."

He's worried that the Fed's quantitative easing policies have created a bubble in Treasury bonds.

And make no mistake: If a Republican president gives him the opportunity, Grant already has a plan, starting with making a public case for the gold standard.

"I would then lay out a timeline for the conversion to a constitutional dollar, a dollar as envisaged by the Founding Fathers," Grant told MarketWatch.

Grant said he believes a dollar should be fixed "like a foot, or a pound."

Such a policy would arrest the steep decline in value the dollar has suffered since the United States abandoned the gold standard in 1971 – a point Paul often raises on the campaign trail.

"Since 1971, since we lost our link to gold, the dollar has lost 85%," Paul recently told NPR. "So if you were a saver and wanted to take care of your kid's education, even if you made a little interest, you're going to lose money."

Middle-class worries like that have helped make a return to the gold standard a major issue in the 2012 Republican primary battle.

The other two remaining GOP contenders, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, are believed to be against a return to the gold standard, though both refrain from talking about it.

Of course, Republican proponents of the gold standard may not need Paul or Gingrich to win the nomination to move the issue forward.

For example, most analysts expect Paul to stay in the primary race to the end to collect as many delegates as possible for the Republican National Convention in August. The assumption is that Paul will try to use his support to get some of his core issues, such as the gold standard, into the official Republican platform.

And depending on how well Gingrich fares in the remaining primaries, he and Paul could join forces to push the adoption of a gold standard plank.

Support for a gold standard could also come from unlikely quarters. As the nominee, Romney could well consider adopting some of his opponents' most popular positions in an effort to unite the party behind him.

Regardless of what happens in the Republican presidential race, the notion of going back to the gold standard is not going away. The issue has gained significant traction among the general public.

A Rasmussen poll last fall found 44% of likely voters favored a return to the gold standard, with just 28% against it. The number in favor rose to 57% when asked: "Do you favor or oppose returning to a gold standard if you knew it would reduce the power of bankers and political leaders to steer the economy?"

As for Jim Grant, he's "sitting by his phone," ready to fight for the gold standard if given the chance.

"I think it's high time that someone in American politics raised the question and helped us form the debate about fundamental monetary change," Grant told NPR, making the classic argument that gold is the original form of money. "Gold is sort of the Muhammad Ali of monetary substances; the world over, you look at it, you know what it is."

News and Related Story Links:

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

  1. Roger James | February 7, 2012

    Perhaps Gingrich, Paul and co would like to give us a detailed plan of how this is going to work. Specifically answers to the following questions :
    – at what rate would they peg the dollar to gold?
    – do they intend to try to get other major players (Japan, China, eurozone, etc) to peg their currencies as well?
    – if so, how are they going to do that?
    – have they thought through the consequences of going back to a fixed-exchange-rate system? (Clue – read your economic history.)
    – have they realized that the demand we have seen in recent years for gold (and I don't mean from speculators) would effectively revalue the dollar upwards against floating currencies rendering US goods and services uncompetitive, make imports even cheaper leading to a widening trade deficit and increased unemployment?

    • Barry Lott | February 7, 2012

      Roger -Go to thegoldstandardnow.org This will explain your questions. Sound policy on Money makes a Nation Strong. America can be the worlds Hero again by going to the Gold Standard. We will go in this decade to zero but I believe we will rise from zero to hero! Righteousness exalts a Nation . A sin is a reproach to any Nation!Our monetary system now is a Abomination not just a sin. Perfect weight and measures is the righteous way to go in the way of money governing for a Nation. But first who do the people worship ? God set the standards for Israel we are told to learn from that. Then People just need to stop frauding one another ECT. But again America will change for the worse in a few short years if we continue being led printing presses which
      WILL BRING US THE THE USA TO RUIN!! This is a wicked way we need to get back to the Gold Standard (Righteous way). Go America pay off the debt! Pay it off!! Yea

  2. George Forrai | February 7, 2012

    This would be a repeat of the CONFISCATION of gold by President Roosevelt at a price BELOW market, presumably, since the gov't would not be able to afford buying up all US-held gold @ market price.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Some HTML is OK