Last Wednesday, only two out of 31 big banks failed the Federal Reserve's "qualitative" round of bank stress tests.
One was Deutsche Bank AG (USA) (NYSE: DB), and the other was Santander Holdings USA Inc. (NYSE: SOV-C).
And then on Thursday, Santander's biggest U.S. unit, Santander Consumer USA, was able to sell a bundle of subprime auto loans, worth $712 million, in a matter of hours.
Today I'm going to show you why this bond deal matters - and how it proves that the worst history always repeats itself...
Santander passed the Fed's first round of bank stress tests the week before, the so-called "quantitative" round that measures how much capital banks have. But it failed the second round, which is about the quality of capital management and risk management relative to what a bank says it would like to do with excess capital.
Most banks want to "reward shareholders" by increasing their dividend payouts or announcing share buyback programs. They think that's a good way to spend their excess capital. Which makes sense, because investors think banks are safe and sound and flush with capital if they're rewarding shareholders.
(That's something of a confidence trick, of course. Increasing equity by getting shareholders to buy shares and lift share prices just happens to be a neat way to get regulators off their backs.)
Anyway, in Round 2 of the stress tests, Santander was wrist-slapped for "critical deficiencies" in areas of "risk identification and risk management."
So, how is it that the very next day investors lined up to buy the Spain-based bank's subprime auto bonds that Moody's Investor Service estimated could see losses of 27%?
Surely investors know that Santander has received subpoenas from federal and state agencies looking into how subprime auto loans are made at the dealer level to folks who don't have jobs and who sometimes use an infant's Social Security number for credit verification?
If those investors read the bond documents, they must have noticed that 13% of borrowers didn't even have a FICO score.
These institutional buyers are smart men and women, so they must know that subprime auto loans (loans on credit scores lower than 640) have doubled since the credit crisis of 2007-2008 and that delinquencies and repossessions are rising.
Of course, they know all that stuff. They're professionals - they know what they're really buying...
They know Santander is packaging up weak loans it used to keep on its books and is now selling them off.
[epom key="ddec3ef33420ef7c9964a4695c349764" redirect="" sourceid="" imported="false"]
These investors want the extra dollop of yield this kind of piggy-paper offers. That's why the highest yielding, lowest rated slices of the Santander auto loan bond deal got bought first.
It's all about yield.
That's what the Fed's zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) hath wrought... again.
We've seen this movie. We know how it ends.
And sure, we've heard this time is different.
It isn't.
Central bank manipulation, across the globe, is all the same. At the same time it's supposed to be buying time for economies to heal and grow their way out of the additional sovereign borrowing, this manipulation is creating massive distortions across capital markets.
You know the saying: Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.
Cops and Robbers? More Like Billionaires and Hedge Fund Managers. Imagine I'm a hedge fund manager and you're a billionaire. I want your money. And you agree to give it to me - on one condition: that I reveal the secret to banking on the housing market. Fine, I say. Here's everything you need to know about profiting from "distressed" housing and an economic crisis...