Start the conversation
I just about fell out of bed last week when I rolled over to scan the first of hundreds of headlines I look at when my day starts, and saw this from IBTimes:
… "Hope Is Not a Strategy" for Twitter
Not that I'm surprised somebody else finally caught on and called the one-time media darling for what it is, only that it's taken so long for everybody to glom on to what we've been discussing since the company IPO'd in 2013… and used almost the exact language I have to describe the situation since.
But, there's something else you should know.
That's what we're going to talk about today.
As always, I'm going to give you a viable alternative and suggestions on the tactics you need to make the jump.
Media Darlings Are Almost Never What They're Cracked Up to Be
Let's backtrack for a minute so that I can make my point.
At the time Twitter IPO'd in 2013, I pointed out who got rich:
…founder Evan Williams became a billionaire out of the gate.
…co-founder and present two-time CEO Jack Dorsey had a $596 million payday.
…Richard Costolo, who drove the company to its IPO, made a cool $192 million.
…the venture firms who participated in Twitter's six funding rounds made at least $574 million.
…the underwriters, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, and Deutsche Bank (among others), made tens of millions.
…even the lawyers made bank.
You'll notice individual investors aren't on that list. They never are, because IPOs really are the preserve of the ultra-rich. So unless you've got the connections, all you're left with is the risk because you're last in line when a company goes public.
Don't get me wrong, IPOs can work out in the short term for traders, but only if you're nimble, have solid risk management in place, and are prepared to lose everything you've put in.
But if you're an investor, the story is very, very different.
The same bunch of folks I just mentioned is counting on one thing and one thing only… being able to sell you the shares they've purchased at heavily discounted rates prior to the IPO, except at a much higher price down the line. So they put the media machine into overdrive, creating hype, daring-do, and hope.
By all accounts they were fabulously successful, ultimately driving the stock to a post-IPO high of $69 per share in December of 2013. But that doesn't change the fact that illusion only lasts so long.
Hope is not a viable investment strategy and it never has been for any company. So you'd best sort that out in a hurry using good old-fashioned numbers to cut to the chase.
Forget that we're talking about Twitter here for a moment and ask yourself if you'd invest in a company that's reported the following:
- A product that more than 1 billion people have tried and abandoned?
- A product that has stagnated at barely 300 million users when competitors like Facebook and Tumblr have more than 1.65 billion and 555 million, respectively?
- A product that has users on it only 66 times a month versus Facebook with 268 sessions per user per month as of February, according to Verto Analytics?
Not unless you're a sucker for hard luck cases.
Twitter's stock performance looks like the Titanic on its way to the bottom.The situation reminds of Enron, or BlackBerry.Both were once go-to companies in their respective industries and yet fell from grace amidst terrible numbers, destroying the retirement dreams of way too many investors who fancied themselves smarter than the markets.
Still, the faithful will not give up. #Goodluckwiththat
A quick skim of the chat boards reveals that there's "hope" that two-time CEO Jack Dorsey can turn things around with longer tweets, the ability to re-tweet, and potentially allow as many as 10,000 characters in tweets that have been limited to 140 characters so far.
In the coming months, we're introducing new ways for you to express even more with a Tweet:
– Twitter (@twitter) May 24, 2016
The company doesn't have months to make a difference, let alone reverse the downward spiral it's entered.
What users really want is a simple "edit" button, and they want it now.
User Alex Heath summed things up nicely with a tongue in cheek observation:
Twitter in 2026: Good news, you can edit tweets AND we've fixed harassment/bullying!
– Alex Heath (@alexeheath) May 24, 2016
Then there's the brain drain.
Executives continue to flee the company.
Wired noted last January that four of the company's 10 senior managers hit the road, including Alex Roetter, Director of Engineering; Katie Jacobs Stanton who headed up media partnerships; Skip Shipper, VP of Human Resources; and VP of Product, Kevin Weil, who headed to Facebook. Most recently, Madhu Muthukumad, Director of Product Management, traded jerseys for Facebook's Instagram.
Contrast that with Facebook Inc. (Nasdaq: FB).
The company has engaged in a systemic program of expansion from the very get-go. I haven't always been crazy about the company because there didn't seem to be a method to the madness until recently. But I've never questioned the forward direction it's travelling.
Team Zuckerberg has hit revenue records regularly, and the stock is up 140.73% since Twitter IPO'd.
Those are the numbers you want for two reasons:
- More than half the world's online population now uses it.
- The company is making rapid moves into virtual reality that will unleash social media's true potential in ways that aren't yet reflected in the stock price and go way beyond just "liking" something or someone.
Tactically, there are a few things to think about if you're caught in the middle on this one, but still want to play along:
- Facebook stock is expensive and going to get more so, which means you'll want to use Total Wealth Tactics that allow you to play along yet minimize risk, including one or more of the following: lowball orders, dollar-cost averaging, or position sizing.
- Set a predetermined profit target and loss target and stick to it as a means of defending yourself against summer doldrums and the Fed's next move. There's no room for emotion, and it may take you more than one try to settle into a longer-term hold under current market conditions.
At the end of the day, I'm with Michael Nathanson of MoffettNathanson, who noted succinctly to clients last Tuesday according to IBTimes that the small "likelihood of a meaningful payoff doesn't justify owning [Twitter] here" – meaning even at these seemingly depressed levels.
Twitter is at best a buyout candidate and at worst a flameout a la Polaroid.
Editor's Note: The first rule of investing is not to lose money through Wall Street darlings like Twitter – but Total Wealth is about much more than avoiding losses that burn most investors. That's why Keith has identified through his 35 years navigating markets six "Unstoppable Trends" so powerful that nothing can derail them – and Keith sees 420% upside in just one of them by November. To access the free report on how to profit from election chaos no matter who wins, sign up for Total Wealth here – it's completely free!
About the Author
Keith Fitz-Gerald has been the Chief Investment Strategist for the Money Morning team since 2007. He's a seasoned market analyst with decades of experience, and a highly accurate track record. Keith regularly travels the world in search of investment opportunities others don't yet see or understand. In addition to heading The Money Map Report, Keith runs High Velocity Profits, which aims to get in, target gains, and get out clean. In his weekly Total Wealth, Keith has broken down his 30-plus years of success into three parts: Trends, Risk Assessment, and Tactics – meaning the exact techniques for making money. Sign up is free at totalwealthresearch.com.